Before the ruling by the court of appeal concerning Marine Le Pen, the National Rally finds itself caught between hope and resignation. In Liévin, during her final speech before her fate was decided, the leader of the far-right party emphasized the strength of her partnership with Jordan Bardella, vowing to support him with conviction should he run for president in 2027. This moment marked a critical juncture for the party, which has been navigating the implications of Le Pen’s legal troubles while preparing for future political battles.
Marine Le Pen announced her appeal to the Court of Cassation following her conviction in the appellate court for embezzling public funds. The sentence included a 15-month period of ineligibility, but the appeal suspends its execution, allowing Le Pen to remain eligible for the presidential election. Rémy Heitz, the prosecutor general near the Court of Cassation, stated on France Inter that the court would make every effort to render its decision before the first round of the presidential election. He emphasized that the court had already set a schedule and would follow the same approach as the appellate court. However, he acknowledged that it was too early to determine precise timelines, noting that the case was still in an early stage and that the number of appeals and complexity of arguments were unknown.
For her appeal to the Court of Cassation, Marine Le Pen selected the former lawyer of François Fillon. This choice highlights the strategic considerations behind her legal strategy, aiming to bolster her chances of overturning the appellate court's decision. Meanwhile, the issues raised by this appeal have sparked discussions about the broader implications for the political landscape and the judicial process.
The appeal has allowed Le Pen to continue campaigning freely until at least the end of 2026, giving her time to prepare for the 2027 election. Her statements on TF1 emphasized her belief in her innocence and her determination to pursue all available legal avenues to prove it. However, it is important to note that the Court of Cassation does not judge the facts of the case but rather examines whether there were errors in the reasoning or application of law by the lower courts. Therefore, the court will not directly address Le Pen’s guilt or innocence.
As for potential scenarios, if the appellate court's judgment is overturned, the case would be sent back to another court of similar jurisdiction for retrial. However, this retrial would likely occur after the presidential election, meaning Le Pen could campaign without hindrance until then. Alternatively, she might rely on the typical delays associated with such cases, which usually take between eight months and a year for the Court of Cassation to decide.
Marion Maréchal, Le Pen’s niece and an elected official, expressed her support for her aunt ahead of the verdict. She praised Le Pen’s resilience and highlighted how her efforts have contributed to the growth of the nationalist movement. Despite past disagreements and political rifts within the family, Maréchal emphasized that the Le Pen legacy is rooted in decades of political struggle and that their influence remains significant despite controversies surrounding their name.
Looking forward, the outcome of the Court of Cassation’s decision will shape the trajectory of both Le Pen and the National Rally. If the appeal is successful, it could reinforce her position as a leading figure in French politics. If not, the party will need to adapt its strategies accordingly, ensuring continuity in leadership and maintaining momentum toward the upcoming elections. Regardless of the result, the political landscape in France appears poised for continued tension and transformation in the coming years.
6 izvještaja
Le MondeNeovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 4 danaMarine Le Pen, čelnica krajnje desne stranke Reconquête (RN), održala je svoj posljednji javni govor prije nego što je Apelacijski sud donio presudu o njenom slučaju.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se prikazuju akcije i izjave Marine Le Pen, a ne jasno strankarski ton. U članku se osvjetljava politička situacija krajnje desne stranke, a ne izričito optužuje jednu ili drugu stranu.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article highlights Marine Le Pen’s public statements and her pressure on judges, but the tone is slightly more emotive and confrontational, suggesting a less objective stance.
Le FigaroNeovisan🔒Sredinaprije 5 hMarine Le Pen je podnijela kaznenu žalbu nakon što je osuđena na žalbu za pronevjeru javnih sredstava, što je dovelo do neizbježnosti od 15 mjeseci. Le procureur général je precizirao da je suspenzija izvršenja kazne, što znači da Marine Le Pen ostaje "presumirana nevina". Također je rekao da je dosje još uvijek u malo naprednoj fazi, s određenom količinom neizvjesnosti, osjetljivim na argumentirane rokove i složenost slučaja.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak prikazuje objektivne činjenice o Marine Le Penovoj žalbi i odgovoru državnog odvjetnika bez jasnog sudjelovanja; izvještava o stanju pravnog spisa, rokovima i stajalištu kasacijskog suda, ne optužujući izričito jednu ili drugu stranu.
LibérationNeovisanSredinaprije 21 hMarine Le Pen je izabrala bivšeg odvjetnika François Fillon da je zastupa u svojoj žalbi na Kasacijskom sudu. Ova odluka dolazi kao dio njezine pravne strategije nakon što je osuđena u slučaju korupcije povezanom s zloupotrebom javnih sredstava za vrijeme dok je bila predsjednica Nacionalnog fronta.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja činjenično izvješće o izboru pravnog zastupnika Marine Le Pen, bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koju političku stranu.
La CroixStranački povezanSredinajučerU članku se raspravlja o žalbi koju je podnijela Marine Le Pen, voditeljica Nacionalnog okupljanja (RN), protiv sudske odluke.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja žalbu i povezana pravna pitanja bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koju stranu. usredotočen je na pravni proces i implikacije za francusku politiku, pružajući uravnoteženo izvještavanje o situaciji bez jasne ideološke pristranosti.
France 24 (Français)Državni / javniSredinajučerMarine Le Pen, vođa stranke Rassemblement National (RN), dobila je odgodu zahvaljujući kaznenom postupku nakon što je osuđena na žalbi. Ovaj postupak omogućuje obustavu zatvorske kazne i izbjegavanje susreta s sudom koji provodi kazne, čime joj se daje sloboda kretanja do 2026.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak objektivno prikazuje činjenice o žalbi Marine Le Pen i pravne implikacije, ne uzimajući politički stav niti favorizirajući određenu stranu.
Le FigaroNeovisan🔒Konzervativnoprekjučer "Bez obzira na odluku, ništa te neće zaustaviti": Marion Maréchal odaje počast svojoj tetki prije presudeMarion Maréchal, europska zastupnica iz skupine Identité-Libertés, odaje počast svojoj tetki Marine Le Pen prilikom donošenja presude žalbenog suda o njezinom statusu kandidata za predsjednika Republike 2027. Naglašava "tenacitet" Marine Le Pen, tvrdeći da zaslužuje poštovanje svojih pristalica, odlučnost svojih protivnika i povjerenje Francuza. Marion Maréchal podsjeća da je obitelj Le Pen uvijek branila zemlju i narod bez parlamentarnog mandata i tvrdi da otpornost obitelji opstaje unatoč unutarnjim sukobima. Također slavi preobrazbu Nacionalnog fronta u Nacionalni skup i snažan položaj pokreta u pogledu predsjedničkih izbora.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): Članak je istaknuo upornost i legitimnost nacionalističkog pokreta koji vodi Marine Le Pen, koristeći izraze kao što su "ténacité", "respect de ses soutiens" i "confiance de millions de Français".
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
France
