ON
← Natrag na feed
Obilježavanje oluje, kao i uvijek, donelo je političke tragove.
Slovenia🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnoprije 6 h

Obilježavanje oluje, kao i uvijek, donelo je političke tragove.

31. obljetnica operacije Oluja u Hrvatskoj obilježena je političkim napetostima i retorikom, unatoč relativno mirnim odnosima između vrhunskih hrvatskih političara poput predsjednika Zorana Milanovića i premijera Andreja Plenkovića. U Kninu se održala središnja proslava operacije, gdje su hrvatske snage okončale rat demontiranjem samoproglašene Republike Srpske Krajine, na kojoj su prisustvovali oba vođa, iako su izbjegli izravni sukob. U međuvremenu, predsjednik Srbije Aleksandar Vučić obilježio je dan u Republici Srpskoj, nazvavši operaciju Oluja "zločinom koji Srbi ne mogu zaboraviti" i upozorio na bilo kakve buduće operacije protiv Srba u Srbiji ili Bosni i Hercegovini.

The annual commemoration of Operation Neviha in Croatia sparked renewed political tensions, with leaders from both Croatia and Serbia expressing sharply contrasting views. On August 5, 2026, Croatian officials in Knin celebrated the 31st anniversary of the military operation that ended the war in Croatia, while Serbian authorities in Mrkonjić Grad marked the day as a remembrance of victims and displaced persons during the operation. The event, which took place in Knin, drew participation from key political figures, including President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, who were largely absent from public disputes this year. In contrast, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić delivered a strongly worded speech in Mrkonjić Grad, calling Operation Neviha a “crime that Serbs must never forget,” and emphasizing the strength of Serbian armed forces. Operation Neviha, conducted by the Croatian military in 1995, was a decisive campaign that led to the end of the Croatian War of Independence. It resulted in the expulsion of ethnic Serb populations from parts of Croatia, particularly in Knin, and marked a turning point in the conflict. While Croatian commemorations focused on national victory, Serbian remembrance centered on the suffering of its citizens during the operation. This divergence has become increasingly pronounced over the years, especially during anniversaries, when political rhetoric often intensifies. Vučić’s remarks in Mrkonjić Grad highlighted his government's stance against any future operations targeting Serbs in Serbia or Bosnia and Herzegovina. He accused Croatia of continuing to rewrite history in ways that ignore the experiences of Serbs. His comments also extended to other regional actors, including the Republic of Kosovo and the Black Mountains. Vučić criticized the Black Mountains for not sending representatives to the Croatian ceremony in Knin, despite having sent one to the Serbian event in Mrkonjić Grad. He suggested that such decisions might have been influenced by the country’s desire to maintain closer ties with the European Union. In response, Croatian officials expressed their own concerns. Defense Minister Ivan Anušić accused Vučić of using similar tactics against critics within Croatia, suggesting that his approach could lead to further polarization. President Milanović, meanwhile, warned that Serbia’s efforts to revise historical narratives could have negative consequences, particularly given the involvement of external advisors and allies. He emphasized the need for transparency and questioned whether such actions were justified. The Black Mountains faced internal criticism as well. The office of President Jakov Milatović stated that the country’s participation in the Knin event was not mandatory and that its foreign policy should reflect respect for all victims of wars in the former Yugoslavia, without selective approaches. This statement was directed at the ruling government, led by Prime Minister Milojko Spajić, who had previously ensured representation at the Croatian event. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs later clarified that the country had sent representatives to the Knin ceremony in each of the past ten years. Among the Croatian participants, the presence of General Tihomir Kundid, chief of the General Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces, was notable. Milanović praised Kundid for his loyalty and for having commanded a battalion during the operation. Kundid had recently found himself caught between Milanović and Plenković over the participation of Croatian soldiers in a military parade in Paris. Despite these tensions, Kundid followed Milanović’s guidance, leading to Croatia sending police officers instead of military personnel to the event.

1 izvještaja

Dnevnik logoDnevnikNeovisan🔒ProgresivnoČinjenice 75Objektivnost 60prije 6 h
Obilježavanje oluje, kao i uvijek, donelo je političke tragove.

31. obljetnica operacije Oluja u Hrvatskoj obilježena je političkim napetostima i retorikom, unatoč relativno mirnim odnosima između vrhunskih hrvatskih političara poput predsjednika Zorana Milanovića i premijera Andreja Plenkovića. U Kninu se održala središnja proslava operacije, gdje su hrvatske snage okončale rat demontiranjem samoproglašene Republike Srpske Krajine, na kojoj su prisustvovali oba vođa, iako su izbjegli izravni sukob. U međuvremenu, predsjednik Srbije Aleksandar Vučić obilježio je dan u Republici Srpskoj, nazvavši operaciju Oluja "zločinom koji Srbi ne mogu zaboraviti" i upozorio na bilo kakve buduće operacije protiv Srba u Srbiji ili Bosni i Hercegovini.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Članak naglašava političke napetosti i kritike srpskog predsjednika Vučića, koji Operaciju Oluja označava kao zločin protiv Srba i kritizira reakcije drugih zemalja.

Zašto činjenice (75): The article reports on the 31st anniversary of Operation Neviha, noting celebrations in Knin and remembrance events in Mrkonjić Grad. It mentions political tensions between Croatian leaders and Serbian President Vučić, as well as historical context about the operation. While the facts align with gen

Zašto objektivnost (60): The article presents a somewhat biased perspective by emphasizing the political conflict between Croatian leaders and Serbian President Vučić. The tone leans toward highlighting the tension, which may reflect a particular viewpoint rather than presenting a balanced account.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče