A 22-year-old student named Sakshi sustained severe injuries during a chaotic confrontation at the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) protest in Delhi on Monday. According to her family, who requested anonymity, Sakshi was caught in a stampede-like situation after tear gas shells were fired by authorities. Her injuries include damage to her neck, and she is currently in intensive care at RML Hospital. Sakshi was accompanied by her elder sister, who also suffered injuries, including a leg wound. Doctors confirmed that Sakshi will require surgery soon. Other individuals were also seriously harmed during the protest. Shaikh Irshad Mansuri, 25, suffered facial, chest, back, and neck injuries. He described how he was struck by a tear gas shell, causing immediate pain and difficulty breathing. His account included details of being hit by an RPF officer and receiving treatment at Lady Hardinge Hospital. Mansuri emphasized that the protest was peaceful and expressed frustration over the lack of assistance from law enforcement. Anshu Mishra, a student who recently sat for the NEET-UG re-examination, recounted being beaten by police during the protest. He mentioned that he was struck on the back and neck before falling to the ground, where the police continued their assault. Videos of the incident circulated online. His friend, Keshav Jha, sustained seven stitches on his head after attempting to shield Mishra from the violence. Both described the unexpected brutality faced by the protesters. Union Health Minister JP Nadda visited RML Hospital and Lady Hardinge Hospital on Tuesday to assess the condition of the injured. During his visit, he spoke with medical professionals about the care provided. However, the CJP criticized the visit as merely symbolic, urging the government to resign Dharmendra Pradhan, the Union Education Minister, instead of engaging in what they viewed as superficial gestures. The protest, aimed at addressing concerns over the NEET exam paper leak and irregularities in the CBSE exams, drew widespread attention. Participants included students and youth activists who demanded Pradhan’s resignation. The protest led to a significant disruption in central Delhi, with internet services suspended in multiple areas. Despite initial attempts to negotiate with authorities, the protest proceeded, leading to confrontations with security forces. Delhi Police responded with lathi charges and tear gas, resulting in numerous arrests and injuries. Reports indicated that several protesters were detained, although specific figures on the number of injured remained unclear. CJP leaders, including Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, met with Nadda to push for Pradhan’s resignation and other demands. Their efforts were met with mixed responses, as the government did not immediately address their requests. Opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi and others, condemned the police actions, criticizing the government for its handling of the situation. They argued that the youth's legitimate concerns were being ignored, and the use of force against peaceful protesters was unjustified. The opposition called for accountability and urged the government to take decisive action to address the issues raised by the protesters. Sonam Wangchuk, a prominent climate activist, announced his intention to continue his fast unless the government met certain conditions, including allowing political leaders to meet him at the hospital and ensuring that education issues would be discussed in Parliament. His wife, Gitanjali Angmo, supported his decision and highlighted the need for dialogue and resolution. The protest underscored deepening tensions over educational reforms and governance, drawing attention from various sectors of society. As the situation continues to unfold, the focus remains on resolving the disputes and addressing the concerns raised by the protesters.
5 izvještaja
Porodica 22-godišnjaka ozlijeđenog u prosvjedu CJP Jantar Mantar22-godišnji student Sakshi teško je ozlijeđen tijekom prosvjeda koji je organizirala Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) u Delhiju u ponedjeljak. Incident se dogodio tijekom policijske akcije, pri čemu je Sakshi pretrpjela ozbiljne ozljede na vratu nakon što je uhvaćena u situaciji sličnoj stampedu nakon bombardiranja suzavaca. Njena obitelj je izvijestila da je bila s starijom sestrom, koja je također pretrpjela ozljede.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se prosvjed prikazuje kao legitimni oblik neslaganja, naglašavajući ozbiljnost policijskih akcija i nedostatak intervencije.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article provides detailed accounts of the injury sustained by Sakshi and another protester, quoting directly from the family and medical professionals. These details are consistent with the broader narrative of police crackdowns described in other articles.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article presents the incident from the perspective of the injured and their family, which could be seen as slightly biased towards the protesters. However, it avoids overtly inflammatory language and sticks to reported facts.
The HinduNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 12 dana Vlada se protivi protestu Žoharačke stranke u Delhiju.Na protestu, koji je bio usmjeren na pitanja poput curenja papira NEET-a i nepravilnosti u ispitima CBSE-a, učesnici su zahtijevali ostavku ministra obrazovanja Dharmendra Pradhan-a. Tijekom događaja, pristup internetu bio je ograničen u dijelovima New Delhija, a neki prosvjednici su pritvoreni. Klimatski aktivist Sonam Wangchuk kritizirao je policijski odgovor i obećao da će nastaviti posti dok se mladi lideri ne sastanu s zakonodavcima.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se prosvjed prikazuje kao legitimni izraz neslaganja protiv vladinog lošeg ponašanja, posebno u vezi s obrazovnim politikama.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article provides detailed information about the CJP protest, including specific locations, injuries, and statements from various individuals. However, it includes some speculative elements like the claim that 'criminals who leaked the papers roam free,' which isn't directly supported by the prim
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article presents a clear narrative favoring the protesters and criticizes the police actions. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'brutality with which peacefully protesting youth are being dealt with' and quotes Rahul Gandhi's condemnation, indicating a bias towards the opposition pers
Scroll.inNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 12 dana Modi je najantitiutnjački PM: Opozicija nakon policijskog represije na prosvjed CJP u Delhiju20. srpnja 2026. opozicijski čelnici u Indiji kritizirali su policijski napad na prosvjed koji je organizirala partija Cockroach Janta u Delhiju, koji je marširao prema Parlamentu. Prosvjed je bio dio tekućih prosvjeda kojima se zahtijevala ostavka ministra obrazovanja Dharmendra Pradhan zbog navodnog loše vođenja natjecateljskih ispita, uključujući curenje ispitnih papira koje je pogodilo oko 7,5 milijuna studenata. Rahul Gandhi, vođa Kongresa, nazvao je premijera Narendra Modija "najviše anti-mladinskim premijerom u povijesti Indije", optužujući njegovu vladu da se nije pozabavila problemom i umjesto toga koristila silu protiv studenata. Predsjednik Kongresa Maljun Klikarharge i kongresna zastupnica Priyanka Gandhi Vadra također su osudili policijsku akciju, navodeći da su studenti koji su izražavali legitimne zabrinutosti bili susretnuti palicama i pritvorom.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se kritizira Modijeva vlada kao nesposobnost da zaštiti interese mladih, koristeći snažan jezik kao što su "anti-mladi" i "kršenje protiv njih".
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports on the tribute paid by Rahul Gandhi and other leaders to NEET suicide victims, including the context of the protests and the government's response. It aligns with the broader narrative of the NEET paper leak controversy.
Zašto objektivnost (70): The article emphasizes the emotional aspect of the tribute and the opposition's stance, which may lean toward supporting the protesters. It presents the event with a certain level of sentimentality.
The PrintNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prije 12 dana Usred prosvjeda u Delhiju, Dharmendra Pradhan susreće Amit ShahČlanak izvještava da se Dharmendra Pradhan, visoki dužnosnik indijske vlade, sastao s Amitom Shahom tijekom prosvjeda u Delhiju.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku je prikazan izvještaj o susretu između dvije političke ličnosti, bez da se otvoreno favorizira nijedna strana.
Zašto činjenice (80): This article corroborates the details of the protest and the meeting between Pradhan and Shah, matching other reports. It accurately reflects the scale of the protest and the security measures taken.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article maintains a neutral tone but emphasizes the government's response to the protests, which may give more weight to official actions. It avoids overt bias but subtly supports the government's stance.
Scroll.inNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prije 12 dana Najnovije vijesti: Prosvjednici lathi-optuženi uoči marš na Parlament, CJP kaže u razgovorima s CentromProsvjednici povezani s partijom Cockroach Janta (CJP) suočili su se s lathi optužbama od strane sigurnosnih službenika dok su se pripremali za marš do parlamenta u Delhiju. Prosvjed, koji se održao tijekom monsunske sjednice parlamenta, susreo se s snažnom sigurnosnom raspoređivanjem i zatvaranjem obližnjih metro stanica zbog sigurnosnih razloga. CJP je optužio vlasti da su zatvorili internet u tom području i tvrdio da nisu dobili odgovarajuće dozvole za događaj. U međuvremenu, opozicijski čelnici i aktivisti pridružili su se okupljanju, dok je policija osporavala izvještaje o nasilju, navodeći da je prosvjed bio profesionalno upravljen.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se prosvjed prikazuje kao legitimna politička akcija s naglaskom na zahtjeve CJP-a i tvrdnje da vlada pretjerava.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article provides details about the CJP's demands, the police's use of force, and the involvement of various political figures. It includes quotes from the spokesperson and media reports. Mostly consistent with other reports.
Zašto objektivnost (75): There is a slight pro-protester bias, particularly in describing the police's actions as 'lathi-charged' and highlighting the activists' grievances. The tone is somewhat sympathetic to the protesters.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj