ON
← Natrag na feed
MK Gotliv optužuje Netanjahu da ju je gurnuo prema dolje na Likudovoj listi zbog tajnog dogovora o pravosudnoj reformi
IL🏛️ PolitikaSredinajučer

MK Gotliv optužuje Netanjahu da ju je gurnuo prema dolje na Likudovoj listi zbog tajnog dogovora o pravosudnoj reformi

Poslanica Tally Gotliv optužila je premijera Benjamina Netanjahua da je potkopao njezin politički položaj u Likud partiji tako što ju je gurnuo na izbornu listu, povezujući ovu akciju s navodnim tajnim dogovorom Netanjahua za održavanje kontrole nad pravosudnim reformama.

MK Tally Gotliv, a member of the Likud party, has stated that she would consider joining Itamar Ben-Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit party if presented with a “good concrete offer.” This declaration comes following her placement at the 20th position on Likud’s electoral list, a result she attributes to deliberate targeting by the party leadership. Gotliv expressed dissatisfaction with her placement, claiming that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had manipulated the list to sideline her. Gotliv’s remarks were made during an interview with KAN Reshet Bet on Tuesday, where she emphasized her willingness to accept a meaningful offer from Otzma Yehudit. “I would be very happy to receive a good concrete offer from Otzma Yehudit, and I would consider it seriously,” she said. She stressed her commitment to serving her constituents and utilizing her capabilities effectively. Gotliv also noted that she had requested to be moved back to the 12th spot on the list, where she had previously been placed before Netanyahu announced his reserved slots. In addition to expressing frustration over her placement, Gotliv accused Netanyahu of undermining her political ambitions. She alleged that the prime minister was attempting to push her aside due to a secret deal related to judicial reform. “It is not for no reason that the prime minister is trying to push me aside,” she said in a recorded statement shared by N12 News. “He knows that my placement on the list is high because I want to be justice minister, because you want me to be justice minister. But he has a deal in his hands.” Gotliv went on to assert that Netanyahu’s actions were tied to maintaining control over judicial reforms. “Write down what I am telling you: the prime minister will receive a pardon as long as there is no judicial reform, as long as there is not even the slightest change to the Supreme Court justices and their powers. And that is the painful truth,” she said. These statements were met with a response from Gotliv on X/Twitter, where she defended her loyalty to Netanyahu and the right-wing government, calling herself a “doormat” if forced to comply with demands she deemed unreasonable. Gotliv also criticized the Likud campaign for failing to address the issue of the Supreme Court’s perceived overreach. She argued that the court’s rulings on diplomatic, military, and political matters were “outrageous” and that the party had not taken sufficient steps to counteract this influence. Despite these criticisms, she reiterated her loyalty to Likud and the prime minister, stating that she remained committed to their cause. The Likud party has denied Gotliv’s allegations of a secret plea deal, calling them “an absolute lie with no basis whatsoever.” The controversy surrounding Gotliv’s placement on the list follows a dramatic decision by Netanyahu just days before the Likud primaries, in which he publicly opposed her and other lawmakers. Political analysts describe this move as a “dramatic political assassination attempt” aimed at preventing her from securing a higher position on the list. Gotliv’s situation highlights broader tensions within Israeli politics, particularly concerning the role of the judiciary and the influence of individual leaders. As Netanyahu continues to dominate the political landscape, the potential for shifts in power and ideology grows more pronounced. With the possibility of his eventual departure from the political scene, the dynamics of Israeli politics may undergo significant changes, prompting deeper discussions on key national issues.

4 izvještaja

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 88Objektivnost 72jučer
MK Tally Gotliv kaže da bi razmislila o pridruživanju Ben-Gviru ako joj se predstavi "dobra konkretna ponuda"

Tally Gotliv iz Likuda izjavila je da će razmotriti pridruživanje stranci Otzma Yehudit ministra nacionalne sigurnosti Itamara Ben-Gvira ako joj se ponudi uvjerljiva prilika, prema intervjuu za KAN Reshet Bet. Gotliv trenutno drži 20. mjesto na parlamentarnoj listi Likuda, za koju tvrdi da je namjerno stavljena niže zbog neslaganja oko pravosudne reforme. Optužila je premijera Benjamina Netanjahua da ju je udaljio u zamjenu za podršku pravosudnim reformama, sugerišući da Netanjahua traži pomilovanje vezano za održavanje statusa quo Vrhovnog suda. Unatoč tim napetostima, Gotliv je potvrdila svoju odanost Likudu i Netanjahua, naglašavajući svoju predanost desničarskoj vladi.

Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se raspravlja o unutarnjim političkim manevrima unutar glavnih stranaka, navodima o favoriziranju i ideološkim sporovima oko pravosudne reforme, ključnim pitanjima u izraelskoj politici.

Zašto činjenice (88): The article accurately reports Gotliv's statement about considering joining Otzma Yehudit and her dissatisfaction with her placement on the Likud list. It includes direct quotes and references her interview with KAN. However, it does not confirm the validity of her claim that Netanyahu intentionally

Zašto objektivnost (72): The article leans slightly toward Gotliv's perspective, using phrases like 'deliberately targeted' and 'sidelined within the Likud,' which imply criticism of Netanyahu. While it presents her statements, it does not balance them with opposing views or official denials, resulting in a somewhat biased

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prekjučer
MK Gotliv optužuje Netanjahu da ju je gurnuo prema dolje na Likudovoj listi zbog tajnog dogovora o pravosudnoj reformi

Poslanica Tally Gotliv optužila je premijera Benjamina Netanjahua da je potkopao njezin politički položaj u Likud partiji tako što ju je gurnuo na izbornu listu, povezujući ovu akciju s navodnim tajnim dogovorom Netanjahua za održavanje kontrole nad pravosudnim reformama.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se prikazuje sukob između Gotliva i Netanjahua kroz prizmu pravosudne reforme i otpora utjecaju Vrhovnog suda, što je u skladu s lijevim kritikama izvršne vlasti i nezavisnosti pravosuđa.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports MK Gotliv's allegations against Netanyahu regarding her placement on the Likud list and the connection to judicial reform. It includes direct quotes from Gotliv and references her public statements on social media. However, it lacks confirmation of the specific details

Zašto objektivnost (70): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'pushing her down,' 'targeted assassination,' and 'doormat,' which suggest bias toward Gotliv's perspective. While it presents her statements, it does not provide counterpoints or contextualize the broader political dynamics, leading to a somewhat one-

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 65prije 4 dana
Kada Netanjahu ode, izraelska politika će morati nešto podržati - mišljenje

U članku se tvrdi da je izraelska politika postala prekomjerno usmjerena na vođstvo Benjamina Netanjahua umjesto rješavanja ključnih nacionalnih pitanja kao što su sigurnost, gospodarstvo i pravosudna reforma.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Iako članak predstavlja kritički pogled na Netanyahuovu dominaciju u izraelskoj politici, ne favorizira nikakvu specifičnu političku ideologiju.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article discusses Netanyahu's influence on Israeli politics and speculates on the implications of his departure, drawing from general knowledge of Israeli political dynamics. While it does not provide specific factual claims that can be verified against a primary source, it aligns with cross-sou

Zašto objektivnost (65): The article has an opinionated tone, presenting Netanyahu as a central figure whose departure would significantly impact Israeli politics. It frames the discussion around Netanyahu's influence and the potential fragmentation of opposition forces, which suggests a bias toward emphasizing his importan

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prekjučer
Strastvena Likudska poslanica kaže da je otvorena za "ozbiljnu ponudu" da se pridruži drugoj stranci

Tally Gotliv, zastupnica iz stranke Likud, izrazila je otvorenost za pridruživanje drugoj političkoj stranci ako joj se ponudi ozbiljna ponuda.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku je Gotlivova izjava predstavljena neutralno, bez da se otvoreno favorizira njen stav ili opozicija.

Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately summarizes Gotliv's position regarding her potential departure from Likud and her openness to joining another party. It mentions her 20th placement on the Likud list and her refusal to be treated as a 'doormat.' However, it does not elaborate on the nature of the alleged 'secr

Zašto objektivnost (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting Gotliv's statements without overtly favoring one side. However, it frames the situation primarily through Gotliv's perspective, potentially limiting the reader's understanding of alternative viewpoints or official responses.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče