ON
← Natrag na feed
Ministarstvo pravosuđa SAD-a odbija objaviti sve Epsteinove spise
Croatia🏛️ Politikaprije 22 h

Ministarstvo pravosuđa SAD-a odbija objaviti sve Epsteinove spise

The U.S. Department of Justice has refused to release additional documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, despite a court order, citing that some materials contain sensitive information about victims or were redacted under law. Assistant Attorney General Stanley Woodward requested a delay or cancellation of the deadline, arguing that the department needs time to clarify ambiguities in the files. He noted that certain emails, with hidden senders and recipients, were redacted to protect victims' identities, and that some communications from victims could appear disturbing out of context. The department also claimed that redactions in an 2007 Florida lawsuit were already present in the original file they obtained. The case also involves notes from an interview with a woman who alleged inappropriate conduct by former President Donald Trump, which the DOJ deemed unnecessary compared to typed reports. These handwritten notes were not released, raising concerns over potential exposure of personal data. The DOJ disputes claims that it violated a congressional law meant to force disclosure, asserting it remains committed to compliance. A federal judge previously ruled against the DOJ,指出

Idi na primarne izvore (1)

Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.

1 izvještaja

Index.hr logoIndex.hrNeovisanSredinaprije 22 h
Ministarstvo pravosuđa SAD-a odbija objaviti sve Epsteinove spise

The U.S. Department of Justice has refused to release additional documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, despite a court order, citing that some materials contain sensitive information about victims or were redacted under law. Assistant Attorney General Stanley Woodward requested a delay or cancellation of the deadline, arguing that the department needs time to clarify ambiguities in the files. He noted that certain emails, with hidden senders and recipients, were redacted to protect victims' identities, and that some communications from victims could appear disturbing out of context. The department also claimed that redactions in an 2007 Florida lawsuit were already present in the original file they obtained. The case also involves notes from an interview with a woman who alleged inappropriate conduct by former President Donald Trump, which the DOJ deemed unnecessary compared to typed reports. These handwritten notes were not released, raising concerns over potential exposure of personal data. The DOJ disputes claims that it violated a congressional law meant to force disclosure, asserting it remains committed to compliance. A federal judge previously ruled against the DOJ,指出

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents both sides of the legal dispute between the DOJ and the court regarding document disclosure. It includes statements from the DOJ defending their actions and quotes from the judge ruling against them. While there is some emphasis on the DOJ’s position, the overall tone remains客观,

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče