Miliband kaže da je ponovno otvaranje Ormuškog prolaza "neophodno" dok se sastaje s Rubiom

Iran has warned that it will further restrict access to the Strait of Hormuz if the United States continues its naval blockade of Iranian ports, according to a statement by Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr, a senior official in Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. Zolqadr, a veteran commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, emphasized that such measures could have severe economic consequences, affecting global energy markets and costing U.S. taxpayers significantly. This comes amid heightened tensions over the strategic waterway, which is vital for global oil exports. Zolqadr’s remarks follow statements from Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, who reiterated Tehran’s commitment to collaborating with Oman to manage maritime traffic through Hormuz. Araghchi warned that third parties, particularly the United States, must not interfere with this effort. Meanwhile, vessels remain anchored near Bandar Abbas, a port city on the southern coast of Iran, highlighting the logistical challenges posed by the current restrictions. In parallel developments, UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband is visiting Washington for his first direct meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Miliband has framed the reopening of Hormuz as crucial to reducing the cost of living for British citizens, emphasizing the link between uninterrupted maritime trade and economic stability. The meeting, held in the wake of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, underscores the geopolitical significance of the strait, which has become a focal point of regional disputes. During the talks, Miliband is expected to address several pressing concerns, including efforts to achieve a lasting ceasefire in Gaza and continued support for Ukraine. The discussion will also cover the broader implications of the U.S.-UK alliance, especially in light of recent shifts in domestic policies and public sentiment. Miliband’s visit coincides with a period of increased scrutiny over his past criticisms of former U.S. President Donald Trump, including allegations of racism and misogyny. These remarks have drawn criticism from U.S. officials, notably Warren Stephens, the U.S. ambassador to Britain, who labeled them as "wrong." The political dynamics surrounding Miliband’s meeting with Rubio reflect deeper tensions within the transatlantic relationship. While the UK has historically maintained a close alliance with the United States, recent years have seen divergences in policy approaches, particularly regarding climate change and energy strategy. Miliband, known for his advocacy of renewable energy and net-zero targets, faces potential friction with Trump, whose administration has taken a more pro-fossil fuel stance. This backdrop adds complexity to the diplomatic engagement, as both sides navigate differing priorities and historical grievances. The economic ramifications of the Hormuz dispute extend beyond immediate trade disruptions. Reports suggest that the closure of the strait has contributed to rising inflation in the UK, with accounting firm EY forecasting a potential 6.4 percent increase by year-end. A prolonged closure could exacerbate these trends, potentially leading to a recession in 2027. Such projections underscore the urgency of resolving the issue, not only for global energy markets but also for the financial health of nations dependent on stable supply chains. As the meeting between Miliband and Rubio unfolds, the stakes remain high. Both leaders are acutely aware of the geopolitical and economic implications of their discussions, particularly in a context where U.S. military operations in the region are contingent on the availability of advanced weaponry. Recent reports indicate that the U.S. has nearly exhausted its stockpile of long-range precision missiles, raising questions about the capacity to sustain military interventions. This reality adds another layer of complexity to the negotiations, as both sides grapple with the practicalities of maintaining regional stability.