ON
← Natrag na feed
Policija je primila pismo o ocu Meghan Markle 2019.
Australia🏛️ PolitikaSredina

Policija je primila pismo o ocu Meghan Markle 2019.

Londonska Metropolitanska policija potvrdila je primanje pisma u siječnju 2019. godine koje sadrži različite tvrdnje o ocu Meghan Markle, Thomasu Markleu, koje uključuju navodna kaznena djela počinjena izvan Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva. Policija je izjavila da je dokument proslijeđen Zapovjedništvu za zaštitu kako bi se riješio sigurnosni problem vojvotkinje od Sussexa i uredu vojvode i vojvotkinje od Sussexa, ali nije podijeljen s drugim agencijama za provedbu zakona. Ovo otkriće slijedi nakon nedavnih otkrića Meghan Markle da je bila svjesna uznemirujućih optužbi protiv svog oca 2018. godine, što ju je navelo da ograniči kontakt svoje djece s njim. Međunarodni izvještaji sugeriraju da je materijal o seksualnom zlostavljanju djece otkriven u bivšoj rezidenciji Thomasa Marklea na Filipinima, iako je on negirao ove optužbe u intervjuu za Daily Mail, opisujući ih kao bolesne laži. Vlasti na Filipinima trenutno istražuju tvrdnje, dok je glasnogovornik FBI-a rekao da je agencija svjesna situacije i spremna pomoći filipinskim vlastima ako je potrebno. Metropolitanska policija sada preispituje svoj početni postupak sa korespondencijom iz 2019. i razmatra,

London’s Metropolitan Police has confirmed that it received a letter in January 2019 containing multiple claims regarding alleged criminal activity by Meghan Markle’s father, Thomas Markle, outside the United Kingdom. A spokesperson for the force stated on Saturday that the document was forwarded to the MPS Protection Command to address security concerns for the Duchess of Sussex. The police noted that while the letter was reviewed, the specific details of the allegations were not shared with other law enforcement agencies. This confirmation arrives amid fresh international investigations into claims that child sexual abuse material was discovered at Thomas Markle’s former residence in the Philippines. The Metropolitan Police statement clarified that the letter was passed to the office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex so they could take notice of the contents. However, the force acknowledged that no formal investigation into the claims within the letter appears to have been initiated at the time. In response to the renewed public attention, the Met announced it is currently reviewing how the matter was handled in 2019. The review includes an assessment of whether the case should be referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct, the United Kingdom’s independent body responsible for overseeing police conduct. Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, issued a statement on Friday expressing that she was deeply distressed by the current allegations. She disclosed that she had been informed by police in 2018 of disturbing and troubling allegations concerning her father. According to Meghan, she was assured at that time that the claims were under investigation. She stated that these prior warnings prompted her to block all contact between Thomas Markle and their children. A spokesperson for Meghan addressed a discrepancy in dates, noting that the Duchess may have been mistaken by a few months regarding when she was first notified, aligning her account closer to the police record of the letter arriving in early 2019. The current controversy stems from reports by British tabloids The Sun and the Daily Mail, which detailed that Thomas Markle’s son, Thomas Markle Jr., discovered hundreds, if not thousands, of images classified as child sexual abuse material in boxes at his father’s home in the Philippines. The Sun published a photograph purportedly showing Thomas Markle Jr. signing a sworn statement submitted to police. In that statement, the son declared he would not speak to his father again unless summoned to provide evidence against him. Authorities in the Philippines have confirmed that an investigation is underway. A police officer in Cebu City, speaking on condition of anonymity, verified that a probe is active. The investigation is being led by a brigade dedicated to the protection of women and children. Thomas Markle, 82, has categorically denied the accusations. In an interview with the Daily Mail, he described the allegations as sick lies and a pile of falsehoods. Reports indicate that Markle is currently staying in a rehabilitation center in Florida. Meanwhile, the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the United States stated that it is aware of the allegations. An FBI spokesperson said the agency would provide support to the Philippine authorities as appropriate. The situation highlights the complex legal and personal dynamics surrounding the family. Prince Harry, the second son of King Charles III and the estranged brother of Prince William, married Meghan at Windsor Castle in May 2018. Thomas Markle did not attend the wedding, a absence that drew significant media scrutiny. The couple subsequently stepped back from royal duties in 2020 and relocated to the United States. They returned unexpectedly to the United Kingdom in August with their two children to reside there. There are conflicting accounts regarding the status of the 2019 letter. While Meghan stated she was told the allegations were being investigated, a source close to the matter claimed that the Metropolitan Police neither investigated nor is currently investigating her father based on that specific correspondence. The police statement did not explicitly confirm whether any investigative steps were taken beyond the initial review and forwarding of the letter to the royal household. The force emphasized that the primary concern raised by the letter related to the security of the Duchess of Sussex due to the nature of the alleged offending occurring abroad. The discovery of the images in the Philippines has triggered a multi-jurisdictional response. While the local police in Cebu handle the immediate investigation, the involvement of the FBI suggests potential cooperation between US and Philippine law enforcement bodies. Thomas Markle’s denial stands in direct contrast to the sworn testimony of his son and the physical evidence reportedly found in the home. The Metropolitan Police’s decision to review its past handling of the 2019 letter indicates internal scrutiny over whether the initial response met procedural standards, particularly regarding the sharing of intelligence with other agencies. The outcome of this review, and whether the police watchdog becomes involved, remains pending. For now, the focus remains on the ongoing inquiry in the Philippines and the personal fallout within the family, with Thomas Markle continuing to reject the charges leveled against him.

Kako je nastao ovaj izvještaj. Objektivne vijesti je ovaj izvještaj napisao iz 2 izvornih članaka uz pomoć umjetne inteligencije prema našoj metodologiji. Riječ je o našem vlastitom tekstu, a ne o kopiji pojedinog medija. Pročitajte našu metodologiju.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaUočili ste pogrešku? Prijavite je

2 izvještaja

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)Državni / javniSredinaČinjenice 92Objektivnost 90
Policija je primila pismo o ocu Meghan Markle 2019.

Londonska Metropolitanska policija potvrdila je primanje pisma u siječnju 2019. godine koje sadrži različite tvrdnje o ocu Meghan Markle, Thomasu Markleu, koje uključuju navodna kaznena djela počinjena izvan Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva. Policija je izjavila da je dokument proslijeđen Zapovjedništvu za zaštitu kako bi se riješio sigurnosni problem vojvotkinje od Sussexa i uredu vojvode i vojvotkinje od Sussexa, ali nije podijeljen s drugim agencijama za provedbu zakona. Ovo otkriće slijedi nakon nedavnih otkrića Meghan Markle da je bila svjesna uznemirujućih optužbi protiv svog oca 2018. godine, što ju je navelo da ograniči kontakt svoje djece s njim. Međunarodni izvještaji sugeriraju da je materijal o seksualnom zlostavljanju djece otkriven u bivšoj rezidenciji Thomasa Marklea na Filipinima, iako je on negirao ove optužbe u intervjuu za Daily Mail, opisujući ih kao bolesne laži. Vlasti na Filipinima trenutno istražuju tvrdnje, dok je glasnogovornik FBI-a rekao da je agencija svjesna situacije i spremna pomoći filipinskim vlastima ako je potrebno. Metropolitanska policija sada preispituje svoj početni postupak sa korespondencijom iz 2019. i razmatra,

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se izravno izvještava o policijskim postupcima i pravnim istragama u vezi s privatnim osobama koje su dio britanske kraljevske obitelji. Dok je tema uključuje visoke profile i ozbiljne kazneno optužbe, ton ostaje neutralna i činjenična, oslanjajući se na

Zašto činjenice (92): The article accurately reflects the specific details regarding the Metropolitan Police's confirmation of receiving a letter in January 2019. It correctly cites the police statement regarding 'claims about alleged offending' and the decision not to share the letter with other agencies. The inclusion

Zašto objektivnost (90): The tone remains largely neutral and journalistic. While the headline uses the word 'allegations,' the body text sticks to reporting what the police stated and what the parties claimed. It avoids sensationalizing the content of the letter itself, focusing instead on the procedural aspects of the pol

news.com.au logonews.com.auNeovisanSredinaČinjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokumentObjektivnost 30
Odvratne slike pronađene u kući Meghaninog oca

Pruženi tekst sastoji se isključivo od naslova koji navodi da su uznemirujuće slike otkrivene u rezidenciji oca Meghan Markle. Nijedan daljnji detalj, kontekst, citati ili istražni nalazi nisu uključeni u priloženom izvadku.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Unos je ograničen na senzacionalni naslov o privatnom pojedincu povezanom s britanskom kraljevskom obitelji. Bez teksta tijela, nema dovoljno dokaza za određivanje specifičnog okvira, pristranosti ili političke optužbe izvan svojstvene kontroverze oko tog predmeta.

Zašto činjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokument

Zašto objektivnost (30): The headline uses emotionally charged and sensationalist language ('Sickening pics'), which immediately frames the story in a negative, judgmental light before any facts are presented. This violates neutrality by injecting an emotional reaction into the title. The lack of visible counter-narrative o

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče