Senior Liberal figures have sharply rebuked former Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s recent comments branding multiculturalism as a failure, with Shadow Housing Minister Andrew Bragg calling the remarks “disgracing” and “out of touch.” The disagreement comes amid growing tensions within the Liberal Party over its leadership and ideological direction, as well as broader debates about identity, immigration, and social cohesion in Australia. Abbott, who served as prime minister from 2013 to 2016, made his controversial remarks in a video posted to social media, claiming that multiculturalism had “failed” and that diversity was “not a strength.” He further criticized Muslim leaders for focusing on Islamophobia rather than addressing the Bondi terror attack, which police allege was inspired by Islamic State ideology. These comments sparked immediate backlash from senior Liberal figures, including Bragg, who dismissed them as reflecting “Neanderthal” views and warned that such rhetoric undermines the values of a pluralistic society. Bragg, speaking on the ABC’s Insiders program, emphasized that multiculturalism is a core component of the Liberal Party’s identity and essential to modern Australia. “Liberalism has actually created multiculturalism,” he said, pointing to the party’s role in establishing freedoms of religion, thought, and conscience. He added that the Liberal Party’s commitment to these principles has helped build a cohesive and inclusive society. Bragg also noted that the party’s recent decision to elect Abbott as its president, despite his inflammatory statements, was a choice that reflects internal divisions. The fallout from Abbott’s remarks has intensified following comments by Assistant Multicultural Affairs Minister Julian Hill, who called the former prime minister’s views “disgusting” and “demeaning.” Hill argued that the Liberal Party cannot disassociate itself from such rhetoric, given that Abbott was chosen as its leader just months earlier. “They made him their president,” he said, implying that the party bears responsibility for allowing such views to shape its public image. Meanwhile, Bragg extended his critique to Pauline Hanson, leader of the far-right One Nation party, whose recent comments on transgender rights were labeled “insane” by the senator. Hanson, during a speech at a conservative political conference in London, claimed that Australia “can’t determine who is a male and female,” arguing that defining gender is a societal failure. Bragg, who has supported transgender children accessing gender-affirming healthcare, condemned Hanson’s stance as harmful to minority groups. “If you want to have a free and fair society,” he said, “I just don’t accept the view Pauline Hanson expresses.” Hanson’s recent trip to the UK and Europe has drawn additional scrutiny. During a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in London, she addressed a largely empty venue, drawing criticism for her low turnout. Despite this, she continued to criticize Australia’s multicultural policies, calling the country “stupid” for embracing diversity and accusing the government of prioritizing environmental concerns over immigration control. Her remarks were accompanied by a visit to a luxury fashion show in Sicily and time spent with billionaire Gina Rinehart at a high-end resort, raising questions about the financial backing of her political activities. Hanson’s comments have also reignited discussions about the historical roots of Australia’s immigration policies. During a podcast with British far-right activist Tommy Robinson, a man with a history of criminal convictions, she suggested that the dismantling of the White Australia policy in the 1970s led to current migration challenges. While she later clarified that she does not support the policy itself, critics argue that her rhetoric risks reopening old wounds and promoting divisive narratives. Experts warn that any attempt to revive elements of the White Australia policy would face significant legal and ethical hurdles in a modern, multicultural Australia. As the political landscape continues to shift, the clash between Bragg and Abbott highlights deepening fractures within the Liberal Party, while Hanson’s influence remains a subject of intense debate. With upcoming state elections looming, the pressure on all parties to present coherent, inclusive platforms will intensify, testing the limits of political tolerance and public trust.
8 izvještaja
ABC News (Australia)Državni / javniProgresivnoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85prije 3 danaMinistar stanovanja u sjeni Andrew Bragg kritizirao je kontroverzne primjedbe bivšeg premijera Tonyja Abbotta o multikulturalizmu, nazivajući ih 'neuspješnim' i tvrdeći da raznolikost 'nije snaga'. Bragg je naglasio da takvi stavovi ne predstavljaju stav Liberalne stranke i tvrdio da se multikulturalizam usklađuje s liberalnim vrijednostima i modernom Australijom.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se kritiziranje Abbotovih primjedbi prikazuje kao dio šireg ideološkog sukoba unutar australijske politike.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article provides specific details about Andrew Bragg's rejection of Tony Abbott's statements on multiculturalism and includes direct quotes from Bragg. These claims are supported by the content of the article itself and align with the broader narrative found in other sources covering the same ev
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone by presenting both Bragg's position and Abbott's controversial remarks. It avoids overtly emotional language and focuses on reporting the disagreement between political figures. However, it does include a judgmental term like 'insane' when describing H
The AgeNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 70prije 4 danaČlanak sadrži više pisama čitatelja koji reagiraju na nedavne vijesti. Jedno pismo hvali australijsku hitnu zdravstvenu službu, opisujući pozitivno osobno iskustvo s brzim liječenjem i niskim troškovima. Drugo raspravlja o političkim izazovima s kojima se suočava One Nation, naglašavajući svoje oslanjanje na kontroverzne ličnosti i teorije zavjere i dovodeći u pitanje njegovu održivost kao legitimne političke snage. Treće pismo slavi multikulturalnost Point Cooka, naglašavajući obogaćivanje zajednice kroz raznolikost. Konačno, spominje se komentator Wale Alyqu koji kritizira pristup Pauline Hanson, sugerišući da njezine politike nemaju novosti i mogu otuđiti potencijalne pristalice.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja različite poglede čitatelja na različita politička pitanja - održivost jedne nacije, multikulturalizam i pristup zdravstvenoj zaštiti - bez otvorene favoriziranja bilo koje strane.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reports Prime Minister Albanese's response to Hanson's comments and his 'test' for Opposition leader Angus Taylor. It cites specific quotes and aligns with other coverage of the political fallout.
Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone is neutral, presenting the political statements without overt bias. However, it frames the situation as a challenge to social cohesion, which may subtly favor the government's position.
The Sydney Morning HeraldNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 65prije 3 danaU članku se raspravlja o rastućem utjecaju Pauline Hanson u australijskoj politici, napominjući da unatoč nedostatku konkretnih politika i oslanjanju na podijeljenu retoriku, ona i dalje dobija značajnu pozornost medija.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja više perspektiva putem pisama uredniku, uključujući kritiku Hansonove retorike, zabrinutost zbog pojačavanja medija razdvajajućih glasova i razmišljanja o multikulturalizmu.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article accurately describes the general perception of Pauline Hanson's political influence and mentions specific instances where she has been reported on by the media. It references other articles from July 18, which aligns with the cross-source consensus. However, it does not provide direct ev
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'circus,' 'divisive opinions,' and 'hot air,' suggesting a critical stance toward Hanson. While it presents multiple perspectives, the overall tone leans toward criticism of Hanson and those amplifying her voice, indicating a lack of complete neu
news.com.auNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 70Objektivnost 60prije 4 danaU članku se raspravlja o kontroverznim primjedbama Pauline Hanson o "Beloj Australiji", koje je ona opisala kao "ozlijeđujući" poziv.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se komentari Pauline Hanson stavljaju u okvir koji je usklađen s konzervativnim perspektivama, naglašavajući pretnju multikulturalizma i naglašavajući zabrinutost zbog imigracijskih politika.
Zašto činjenice (70): The article uses strong language ('sickening call') to describe Hanson's remarks, which may not be supported by direct evidence. It appears to frame her comments in a negative light without providing detailed context or sources to substantiate the claims. The lack of specific information reduces its
Zašto objektivnost (60): The article exhibits a strongly negative tone towards Hanson, using emotionally charged language that reflects a clear ideological bias. The phrasing suggests a judgmental stance rather than presenting facts objectively.
ABC News (Australia)Državni / javniKonzervativnoČinjenice 60Objektivnost 70prije 4 dana Pauline Hanson održava govor CPAC Londonu na većinom praznih sjedalaPauline Hanson, voditeljica australijske stranke One Nation, održala je govor na konferenciji konzervativnih političkih akcija (CPAC) u Londonu, ali je događaj privukao minimalnu prisutnost, s manje od četvrtine popunjenih mjesta.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): Članak prikazuje govor i aktivnosti Pauline Hanson kroz objektiv koji se poklapa s desničarskom retorikom, naglašavajući njezine kritike 'budne' kulture, imigracije i ekološke politike.
Zašto činjenice (60): The article discusses a letter to the editor praising urgent care services, but it does not provide the full letter or context. This limits the ability to assess the factual basis of the claims made in the letter.
Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone is generally neutral, but the inclusion of a reader's letter introduces a subjective perspective that may influence objectivity.
The Conversation (AU)NeovisanProgresivnoprije 21 hU članku se raspravlja o sve većem medijskom nadzoru s kojim se suočavaju Pauline Hanson i njezina stranka One Nation, ističući nekoliko incidenata koji su privukli javnu i novinarsku pozornost.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se Hansonove akcije i retorika prikazuju na način koji naglašava kontroverzu i potencijalnu prijetnju koju predstavljaju njene politike, osobito u vezi multikulturalizma i kontrole imigracije.
The AustralianNeovisan🔒KonzervativnojučerU članku pod naslovom "Razlaganje multikulturalizma bila bi nacionalna tragedija" koji je objavio The Australian tvrdi se da pad multikulturalizma predstavlja značajan rizik za društvenu koheziju i nacionalni identitet Australije.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se multikulturalizam prikazuje u negativnom svjetlu, sugerišući da vodi društvenoj podjeli i potkopava nacionalni identitet.
SBS NewsDržavni / javniKonzervativnoprekjučerPauline Hanson, voditeljica stranke One Nation, ponovno je pokrenula rasprave o povijesnoj politici "Bijele Australije", sugerišući da je njeno ukidanje 1970-ih dovelo do trenutnih migracijskih izazova.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se rasprava vrti oko retorike Pauline Hanson, koja se poklapa s desničarskim nacionalističkim osjećajima.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
Australia
