Malta's highest-profile criminal trial since independence concluded Monday with the acquittal of Yorgen Fenech, a prominent businessman and property developer, on charges related to the 2017 assassination of investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia. The verdict, delivered by a jury of nine individuals, cleared Fenech of complicity in the murder and association with the intent to commit a crime. The decision comes nearly nine years after Caruana Galizia, 53, died in a car bomb attack near her home in Paola, a suburb of the capital city, Valletta. The trial, which lasted two months, centered on whether Fenech had orchestrated the killing through intermediaries. Prosecutors alleged that Fenech paid €150,000 to Melvin Theuma, a taxi driver turned whistleblower, to carry out the attack. The money was supposedly transferred through a third party, and Fenech was accused of acting on behalf of powerful political interests. The prosecution sought a life sentence for Fenech, arguing that his influence and connections made him capable of purchasing justice. During the trial, the defense maintained that Fenech was merely a pawn in a larger conspiracy involving high-ranking officials. His legal team pointed to Keith Schembri, the former chief of staff to former Prime Minister Joseph Muscat, as the likely mastermind behind the murder. Schembri testified during the proceedings, denying any involvement in the plot or leaks of sensitive information to Fenech. The defense contended that the police investigation into Schembri was inadequate and that key evidence had been overlooked. Caruana Galizia, known for her relentless pursuit of corruption within Malta's government, had previously exposed links between political leaders and organized crime. Her death sparked widespread outrage and led to a major political upheaval. Muscat resigned in 2020 amid pressure from the public and international observers, following revelations about his alleged ties to the murder. Two of his ministers and his chief of staff also stepped down, marking a turning point in Malta's democratic evolution. The trial revealed the extent of Fenech's political connections and raised concerns about potential interference in the initial investigation. Several witnesses, including Fenech himself, testified that Schembri had access to confidential information that could have influenced the outcome of the case. This testimony added layers of complexity to the narrative surrounding the murder, suggesting that the conspiracy might extend beyond Fenech and involve elements of Malta's political elite. Prosecutor Anthony Vella emphasized during his closing remarks that Fenech had the means, motive, and opportunity to orchestrate the killing. He described Fenech as someone who believed he could manipulate the system to achieve his goals. However, the jury ultimately rejected these claims, finding Fenech not guilty by an eight-to-one margin. The decision has left many questioning the effectiveness of Malta's judicial system and its ability to hold powerful individuals accountable. The acquittal has been met with disappointment by Caruana Galizia's family and supporters, who viewed the trial as a crucial step toward ensuring transparency and accountability in Malta's governance. The ruling may also prompt the prosecution to appeal the verdict, seeking a reversal of the decision. Meanwhile, the case continues to resonate deeply within Maltese society, serving as a reminder of the challenges faced by journalists and activists in their quest for truth and justice.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj