'Argentinci su kao žohari, nuklearni napad bi preživjeli. Jedna nepredviđena stvar odlučila je svjetskog prvaka'

Hajduk Split edged past Žilina in a dramatic second-leg encounter in the European competition qualifiers, securing a narrow victory after a tense match filled with missed chances and last-minute heroics. The game saw the Croatian side clinch a crucial away win, ensuring their progression to the next stage following a 1-1 draw in the first leg. The decisive moment came in the 91st minute when Darija Melnjak's own goal handed Hajduk the advantage they needed to advance. The match began with a swift opening goal from Šimun Hrgović, who converted a free kick in the second minute of the first half. His strike gave Hajduk an early lead, which seemed to set the tone for the match. However, Žilina responded quickly, equalizing through Marko Roginić in the 53rd minute. The momentum shifted dramatically in the final stages, with Žilina appearing to take control before Melnjak’s costly error sealed Hajduk’s fate. Gonzalo Garcia, the head coach of Hajduk, acknowledged his team's lack of energy compared to the first leg but insisted they had largely maintained control throughout the match. “We had control in the first half and created several opportunities,” he said. “We were good, but we lacked the energy from the first match. If we had been more precise in our final passes, we could have created more serious chances.” Despite the challenges, Garcia emphasized that his team was not content with merely defending their lead. “We never want to defend. That is not our philosophy,” he stated. He admitted that the squad struggled with pressing high and faced difficulties in one-on-one situations, both on the ground and in the air. One of the key decisions under scrutiny was the late introduction of Dalisson. Garcia explained that while he felt the team had control in the first half, the substitution was made once they started losing grip on the game. “I could have brought him in earlier, but I don’t think I was too late. Once we lost control, he came in and helped us. He is a different type of player than Skoko,” he added. Reflecting on the season, Garcia noted that this year’s team has grown stronger and more cohesive compared to last season’s struggles in European qualification matches. “Last year, we played with fewer players and managed to equalize, but then conceded a goal from a long-range shot. This time, we’re more mature. We’ve become a team. We had some tough moments, but we suffered together. We're stronger and have better chemistry. It doesn't mean we'll win every game, but this is the right path,” he remarked. The coach also addressed the decision to bench Marko Livaja for much of the match. “When Marko plays, we need to adjust our style. Žilina went all or nothing in the end, and he's strong and excellent at winning long balls. He won duels. We had control five minutes before he came on, there wasn't chaos that forced us to bring him in. He played very well. We’ll see how much he plays. The team plays well, and he does his job, so that's what we need,” Garcia concluded. Amar Osim, a renowned Bosnian-Herzegovinian football coach and son of legendary Ivica Osim, analyzed the match as a clash of two distinct philosophies. He described Spain as a team built on possession, patience, and clarity, contrasting them with Argentina’s pragmatic approach, which relied on waiting for mistakes and surviving pressure. “Argentina chose the only way that could give them a result,” Osim said. He acknowledged that while Argentina’s tactics were not entirely clean, they were far from being unsporting. “Until the 90th minute, it wasn’t anything major. Compared to previous matches, especially against England, this wasn’t that bad. Argentina chose a way of playing they believed would get them a result, and they did it successfully.” Osim highlighted the red card as a pivotal moment in the match. “The red card was unexpected. Argentina was missing their most potent player, and without him, even with Messi, it became a completely different game. With ten men against nine, you can still defend, but with ten against eight against Spain, it was impossible.” He viewed the extra time as part of Argentina’s strategy rather than panic. “They knew they had Martinez on the spot and were waiting for penalties. I believe Spain wouldn’t have dominated as much if they hadn’t been down a man. The red card directed the match towards the better team. And Spain deserved it.” Osim praised Argentina’s ability to endure pressure, comparing them to “warriors” capable of surviving nuclear attacks. “They know exactly what to do. They don’t need a coach to tell them. They know when to slow down, when to stop, when to commit a foul, when to steal time, when to shoot. They are perfect in that aspect.” In contrast, Osim viewed Spain’s victory as a triumph of system, philosophy, and consistency. “Spain’s win is a victory of school, system, and mindset. People stick to what they are and go all the way in that direction. That’s why they are the best.” He noted that while this Spanish team may not have the individual brilliance of the 2010 squad, they remain a formidable unit. “That 2010 team had Xavi, Iniesta, Puyol, Pique, Ramos, David Villa, Fernando Torres, they were individually stronger. But this Spain isn’t weaker as a team. They know exactly who can do what, and that’s what makes them successful.”