Ekvadorsko tužilaštvo traži šest i pol godina zatvora za bivšeg predsjednika Lenina Morena

The Ecuadorian Public Prosecutor's Office has formally requested a prison sentence of six years and six months for former President Lenín Moreno, along with 19 other individuals, on charges of bribery. The accusation centers around allegations that Moreno received bribes from the Chinese state-owned company Sinohydro while serving as vice president under Rafael Correa. This legal action marks a significant moment in Ecuador’s ongoing efforts to address corruption within its political elite.

According to reports published by ABC on July 9, 2026, the request was made by Carlos Alarcón, the country's Attorney General. The case alleges that during his tenure as vice president, Moreno accepted illicit payments from Sinohydro, which is believed to have been part of a broader scheme involving corrupt officials. The prosecution claims that these payments were intended to secure favorable treatment or influence decisions related to public contracts or policy-making. The indictment includes several high-profile figures, suggesting that this case could have far-reaching implications for Ecuador's political landscape.

The accused include not only Moreno but also other government officials who allegedly participated in the alleged bribery scheme. The charges highlight the extent to which corruption may have permeated the highest levels of Ecuadorian politics. The involvement of a major Chinese enterprise underscores the international dimensions of the case, potentially drawing attention from both domestic and foreign observers. The trial is expected to reveal more about the mechanisms of corruption and how such schemes operate within the framework of public office.

The case against Moreno comes amid a period of heightened scrutiny of Ecuador's political leadership. In recent years, there have been increasing calls for transparency and accountability, particularly following revelations of financial impropriety linked to previous administrations. The current investigation into Moreno’s past actions reflects a broader trend of judicial and legislative bodies taking a firmer stance against corruption. This shift has led to the prosecution of several prominent politicians, signaling a possible turning point in Ecuador's approach to governance.

While the specifics of the alleged bribes remain under investigation, the case has already sparked considerable debate among political analysts and citizens alike. Some argue that the charges are politically motivated, pointing to the timing of the indictment and the potential impact on upcoming elections. Others view the prosecution as a necessary step toward restoring public trust in institutions. The case has also raised questions about the independence of the judiciary and whether the legal process will be fair and transparent.

In Spain, El País recently covered a similar type of corruption case involving a group of businessmen in Andalusia, where they were allegedly involved in money laundering activities connected to drug trafficking. The case highlighted the creative methods used by criminal networks to bribe officials, including unconventional offers such as gift cards embedded with cash. While this case is unrelated to Ecuador, it illustrates the global nature of corruption and the diverse tactics employed by organized crime groups to infiltrate legitimate systems.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcome of the case against Moreno and others could set important precedents for future prosecutions. It may also influence the direction of Ecuador’s political reforms and the level of public support for anti-corruption measures. The trial is likely to continue generating media coverage and public interest, further shaping the national discourse on ethics and governance. With the legal process still in its early stages, the full scope of the allegations and their implications remains to be seen.