Sudski postupak u kojem su uključeni Marko Slavič mlajši i Bela Benedek uzeo je novi zaokret jer je Okružni sud u Mariboru odlučio dopuniti postojeće stručno mišljenje o ekonomskom opravdanju spornih poslovnih aktivnosti koje su ključne za optužbe za utaju poreza i navodno mito.
Odluka suda da dopuni stručno mišljenje naglašava složenost koja okružuje financijske transakcije pripisane Slaviću i Benedeku.
Na taj potez mogla bi utjecati tekuća odluka Vrhovnog suda o preispitivanju poreznih odluka, dodajući još jedan sloj neizvjesnosti putanji slučaja.
U međuvremenu, u Piranu, gradonačelnik Andrej Korenika nalazi se pod nadzorom Komisije za sprečavanje korupcije (KPK). Njegovo javno odobravanje trenutnog direktora Obalne galerije Piran, Mari Ambrožič Verderber, neposredno prije objave procesa zapošljavanja novog direktora izazvalo je navode o prethodnoj pristranosti i favoriziranju prema njoj. KPK je potvrdio da ispituju ovo pitanje u okviru preliminarne istrage, ocjenjujući jesu li došlo do kršenja zakona o integritetu i antikorupcijskih propisa. Naglasili su da kadrovski procesi u javnoj upravi zahtijevaju transparentnost i potragu za najboljim kandidatima bez političkog utjecaja.
U odgovoru, predstavnici općine Piran su porekli da su primili bilo kakvu obavijest od KPK-a i izjavili da je izjava gradonačelnika bila samo reakcija na izvještaje u medijima koji sugeriraju nezakonito upravljanje galerijama i pozitivnu evaluaciju rada ravnatelja.
Ova situacija usko je povezana s presudom Upravnog suda u Novoj Gorici, koji je krajem prošle godine zaključio da je grad Piran, pod prethodnom gradonačelnicom Đenijom Zadković, prekršio zakonodavstvo tijekom imenovanja Mari Ambrožič Verderber na mjesto ravnatelja.
Predstavnici općine Piran objasnili su da je sud u to vrijeme identificirao samo proceduralnu grešku. Uvjerili su da će se novi proces zapošljavanja pridržavati zakonodavstva, nove pravosudne prakse i dužne pažnje. Veza između ovih slučajeva naglašava šire zabrinutosti oko korupcije i integriteta u lokalnoj upravljanju, posebno u svjetlu nedavnih pravnih događaja i tekućih istraga. Kako se pravni krajolik nastavlja razvijati, rezultati ovih slučajeva vjerojatno će oblikovati buduće prakse i politike usmjerene na osiguravanje transparentnosti i odgovornosti u javnoj upravi.
3 izvještaja
VečerNeovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 3 danaThe trial of Marko Slavič Jr., a Plješka businessman, and Béla Benedek, a Hungarian entrepreneur, continues as the Maribor District Court has decided to supplement the expert opinion on the economic justification of disputed transactions at the center of allegations of tax evasion involving millions of euros and alleged bribery. The prosecution changed a key part of the indictment following a court decision by the European Union. Slavič is responding to accusations of conducting business through alleged shell companies. The alleged bribe of 668,000 euros and a seized spreadsheet are under scrutiny. The court rejected the appointment of a new expert but ordered the supplementation of the existing expert opinion. The ongoing decision by the Supreme Court regarding the revision of tax decisions could influence the case.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article provides a factual account of legal proceedings without overtly favoring any side. It outlines the court's decision to supplement the expert opinion and mentions the allegations against the defendants without taking a stance on their guilt or innocence. The language remains neutral, and,
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 70): Highly factual with clear legal details and alignment with other sources. Objectivity slightly lower due to emphasis on Balažic’s legal situation and less balance in presenting opposing views.
Primorske noviceNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prije 3 danaThe article discusses allegations of potential bias in the selection process for the director of Piran's Coastal Galleries, involving Mayor Andrej Korenika and current director Ambrožič Verderber. The Public Integrity Commission (KPK) confirmed they are investigating the matter under previous scrutiny, checking circumstances related to integrity and anti-corruption laws. Officials from Piran Municipality stated that the mayor’s public praise was a response to media reports suggesting unlawful leadership and a positive evaluation of the current director’s work. They emphasized that the mayor’s comments do not interfere with equal opportunities for candidates in future processes. The issue is linked to a court ruling from last year, which found that the municipality violated regulations during the appointment of Ambrožič Verderber under former mayor Đenia Zadković. The court concluded that the municipality failed to justify her removal from the process, and while the municipal council attempted to challenge this at the Supreme Court, the judges rejected the revision proposal in June.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents both perspectives: the KPK investigation into possible legal violations and the municipal authorities’ defense of the mayor’s actions as a legitimate response to media narratives. There is no clear ideological leaning in the framing, as the report remains balanced between the KП
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 80 · Objektivnost 75): Factual with good alignment to other reports. Objectivity is slightly lower due to focus on Balažic's legal status and less attention to broader implications.
N1 SlovenijaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 70Objektivnost 80prije 3 danaThe Corruption Prevention Commission (KPK) has initiated a preliminary investigation into the conduct of Piran mayor Andrej Korenika, focusing on his public support for the director of the Piran Coastal Galleries, Mari Ambrožič Verderber, shortly before the announcement of a new tender for the position. The allegations suggest possible prior favoritism toward the current director. The KPK confirmed they are examining the case under the integrity and anti-corruption law. Meanwhile, the municipality of Piran denies any wrongdoing, stating that the mayor's statement was merely a response to media reports about alleged illegal management of the galleries and a positive assessment of the director's work. They emphasized that the new tender process would be fully open to all candidates and that the mayor's support did not influence the selection committee. This issue is linked to a previous court ruling from late last year, which found that the municipality had violated regulations during the appointment of Ambrožič Verderber under the previous mayor, Đenia Zadković. The court ruled that the municipality failed to justify the exclusion of another candidate, and the decision was upheld by
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents both the allegations against the mayor and the municipality's denial, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It includes statements from the KPK and the municipality, offering a neutral account of the situation.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 70 · Objektivnost 80): Moderately factual but lacks depth on specific allegations. Objectivity is high as it presents both the KPK's concerns and the občina's defense without bias.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
Slovenia
