A federal judge has blocked New York’s new law that would require Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to wear face masks while on duty in the state, citing constitutional concerns. However, the court preserved New York’s Termination Act, which prevents local governments from entering into 287(g) agreements with ICE. These agreements allow local law enforcement to assist in identifying undocumented immigrants for deportation. U.S. District Judge Mae D’Agostino, appointed by former President Barack Obama, ruled that the masking law was designed to impede federal immigration enforcement efforts, violating the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. She issued a preliminary injunction against the law, despite acknowledging her sympathy with New York’s intentions to promote transparency in policing. In her decision, she emphasized that the legal challenge centered on constitutional issues rather than policy preferences or public sentiment. While the judge struck down the mask requirement, she upheld the Termination Act, which will go into effect later this month. This act terminates existing 287(g) agreements and prohibits the formation of new ones. Thirteen jurisdictions in New York currently hold such agreements with ICE. These arrangements typically empower local officers to screen inmates for possible deportation and initiate removal processes. Some agreements extend to training local officers to conduct immigration checks during routine duties. ICE officials have praised these agreements as effective tools for increasing deportation rates, especially among individuals with criminal records. Conversely, immigrant advocacy groups argue that the agreements disproportionately target undocumented immigrants with minor offenses. In response to growing concerns over ICE’s practices, several Democratic-led states have enacted legislation aimed at limiting the agency’s reach, with anti-masking laws being a common feature. New York’s anti-ICE mask law faced similar challenges in other states. Laws in Philadelphia, California, and Virginia attempting to restrict ICE agents’ ability to wear masks have also been blocked by federal courts. The New York Immigration Coalition expressed disappointment over the rejection of the mask law, stating that masked ICE agents could operate without accountability, endangering residents. The group welcomed the court’s support for ending 287(g) agreements, however. Meanwhile, ICE has intensified its presence at U.S. airports, collaborating with Transportation Security Administration (TSA) personnel to arrest undocumented immigrants at check-in counters and departure gates. This increased activity reflects broader efforts by the agency to expand its enforcement operations beyond traditional settings. Reports indicate that ICE agents are conducting more frequent raids and detentions at major transportation hubs across the country. Separately, the White House posted a TikTok video featuring Puerto Rican rapper Bad Bunny’s music set to footage of ICE arrests. However, the audio has since been muted, preventing viewers from hearing the track. The video, which celebrated the administration’s immigration enforcement achievements, included clips of undocumented immigrants being taken into custody. Bad Bunny, who has publicly criticized ICE and expressed opposition to Trump-era immigration policies, has yet to comment on the video. The White House’s use of Bad Bunny’s music sparked controversy, given the rapper’s history of opposing ICE and criticizing U.S. immigration policies. In past statements, Bad Bunny has expressed concern over ICE’s presence at his concerts and has called for open borders. His song “NUEVAYoL” features imagery critiquing American immigration policies, including a scene where a Puerto Rican flag covers the Statue of Liberty. As tensions surrounding ICE continue to escalate, both supporters and critics of the agency remain divided. Legal battles over the scope of ICE operations persist, with courts weighing the balance between federal authority and state autonomy. Meanwhile, grassroots movements and legislative actions aim to curtail ICE’s influence, reflecting deepening societal divisions over immigration enforcement.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
United States
