U članku se raspravlja o osobnom iskustvu autora s podvrgavanjem kozmetičkim tretmanima kao što su Botox i punila ispod očiju, vođenim društvenim pritiscima i utjecajem estetike društvenih medija.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak se fokusira na osobna iskustva i društvene trendove vezane uz kozmetičke procedure pod utjecajem digitalnih medija, umjesto da se izravno bavi političkim pitanjima, politikama ili vladinim djelovanjima.
Zašto činjenice (65): The article references a survey by Norstat on behalf of Teoxane, but does not provide full details of the study or cite specific numbers from the primary source document. It mentions 'over half of patients' which aligns with the 52% figure for those under 35, but lacks specificity on other statistic
Zašto objektivnost (45): The tone is highly subjective, focusing on the author's personal experience and using emotionally charged language like 'brainwashed,' 'grubby truth,' and 'facial dysmorphia.' The article frames the issue as a personal struggle influenced by social media, which introduces bias and lacks balance.

![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.rappler.com%2Ftachyon%2F2026%2F08%2Ffact-check-full-post.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)




