ON
← Natrag na feed
Zašto u Njemačkoj nestaje toliko online ocjena?
Germany🏛️ PolitikaSredinaprije 19 h

Zašto u Njemačkoj nestaje toliko online ocjena?

U članku se raspravlja o sve većem broju online recenzija koje se uklanjaju iz Google Maps-a u Njemačkoj, posebno iz restorana i hotela.

In Germany, a growing number of online reviews have been removed from Google Maps due to complaints over defamation, according to a recent survey conducted by the German Press Agency (dpa). The study examined more than 3,700 restaurants and hotels in several German cities and found that between 11 and 30 percent of these businesses had deleted reviews. The proportion was particularly high in major urban centers such as Frankfurt, Berlin, and Cologne, where nearly one-third of the surveyed establishments reported review deletions. Jürgen Benad, managing director of the Dehoga national association representing hotel and restaurant operators, emphasized the importance of online reviews for many businesses. “Online reviews are an essential part of how businesses present themselves to customers,” he stated. He noted that while constructive criticism should remain, businesses often remove reviews that contain defamatory content, fake ratings, or false factual claims. This practice helps maintain trust in rating platforms, which rely on distinguishing legitimate feedback from misuse. The issue extends beyond Germany within Europe. According to data from the EU Transparency Database under the Digital Services Act, over 756,500 posts were removed from Google Maps in the first half of 2026 across the European Union. Remarkably, almost 99.9 percent of these removals occurred in Germany, highlighting the country's unique position in this trend. Many businesses reported that they only file complaints against reviews they deemed fabricated, insulting, or entirely invented. Some establishments mentioned instances where individuals attempted to exert pressure through threats of poor reviews. These tactics, however, are generally considered unethical and are typically rejected by business owners who prioritize transparency and fair treatment. Google has introduced a transparency measure to inform users when a profile has had reviews removed. This notice appears directly beneath the review section in a business’s Google listing. The company explains that this feature is intended to increase clarity, especially in Germany, where a large volume of complaints related to defamation under local law have led to frequent removals. Google defines defamation broadly, including untrue factual assertions or opinions not substantiated by facts. Businesses can also claim that the reviewer was not a genuine customer. While some businesses argue that removing reviews could negatively impact their visibility, Google maintains that the presence of this notice does not affect search rankings or local search results. Instead, it aims to provide users with information about potential biases or issues with the review system. According to the dpa survey, approximately half of the affected businesses reported deleting between one and 20 reviews. About 20 percent had deleted between 21 and 50 reviews, while a smaller group had deleted up to 250 reviews. Many businesses cited reasons such as spam, bot-generated reviews, or false statements as justifications for their actions. Some operators also mentioned that they would report hate speech or inciting remarks to Google, as these types of comments violate community guidelines. Several businesses stressed that they believe honest, factual criticism should remain visible, as it contributes to service improvement. They argued that allowing constructive feedback helps them better serve their customers and maintain quality standards. Despite these efforts, the debate over the balance between free expression and protecting businesses from harmful misinformation continues to shape the landscape of online reviews in Germany.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Idi na primarne izvore (1)

Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.

2 izvještaja

heise online logoheise onlineNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 60prije 19 h
Zašto u Njemačkoj nestaje toliko online ocjena?

U članku se raspravlja o sve većem broju online recenzija koje se uklanjaju iz Google Maps-a u Njemačkoj, posebno iz restorana i hotela.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja uravnotežen pogled navodeći i perspektivu ugostiteljskih poduzeća i regulatorni okvir koji je predviđen Zakonom o digitalnim uslugama EU-a.

Zašto činjenice (80): The article references the EU-Transparenzdatenbank and mentions the deletion of over 756,500 entries in the first half of 2026 due to 'illegal content,' aligning with the primary source document. However, it lacks specific details about the dashboard's structure or data aggregation methods described

Zašto objektivnost (60): While the article attempts to present both sides, it leans toward supporting businesses by highlighting their justification for removing reviews. It includes quotes from industry representatives but could have presented more diverse perspectives or included counterpoints from consumers or regulators

Die Zeit logoDie ZeitNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 30Objektivnost 50prije 22 h
Gastronomija: brisanje online ocjena: koliko vrijede zvijezde?

U članku se raspravlja o praksi brisanja online recenzija u restoranima i hotelima, naglašavajući njihov značajan utjecaj na odluke potrošača. Navodi se istraživanje Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa) koje je analiziralo više od 3.700 objekata, otkrivajući da su mnogi uklonili recenzije zbog pritužbi. U članku se objašnjava kako Google sada prikazuje obavijest kada se recenzije brišu, navodeći mjere transparentnosti povezane s tužbama za klevetu prema njemačkom zakonu. Stručnjaci naglašavaju gospodarski značaj online ocjena, napominjući da utječu na izbore kupaca i zapošljavanje.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja uravnotežene informacije iz više perspektiva, uključujući mišljenja stručnjaka i podatke iz ankete koju je provela ugledna novinska agencija.

Zašto činjenice (30): The article discusses the removal of online reviews but does not reference the EU-Transparenzdatenbank directly. It cites a dpa survey of over 3,700 restaurants and hotels, but there is no mention of the primary source document provided. The claim about Germany accounting for nearly all deletions is

Zašto objektivnost (50): The article presents the issue with a clear bias towards the perspective of restaurant owners and industry representatives, emphasizing the economic impact of review removals. It uses emotionally charged language like 'unangenehm' (unpleasant) and frames the situation as a justified response to fake

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče