ON
← Natrag na feed
Francuski ministar podnosi ostavku jer poljoprivredni zakon otvara vrata spornim pesticidima
ZA🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnoprije 16 h

Francuski ministar podnosi ostavku jer poljoprivredni zakon otvara vrata spornim pesticidima

Francuski ministar podnio je ostavku zbog kontroverznog poljoprivrednog zakona koji dopušta upotrebu određenih pesticida pod izuzećem. Zakon dopušta acetamiprid, neonikotinoidni pesticid, za lešnike i flupiradifuron za šećerne repe, jabuke i trešnje. Ekološke grupe i sindikati malih poljoprivrednika tvrde da zakon favorizira veliki poljoprivredni biznis i zanemaruje znanstvene zabrinutosti o šteti oprašivačima i ekosustavima, a Greenpeace ga naziva "sramotom". Šećerna industrija brani pesticide kao potrebne za borbu protiv štetočina poput ptica. Odricanje zahtijeva odobrenje francuske zdravstvene agencije, Anses, i ograničeno je na tri godine. Peticija protiv zakona prikupila je preko dva milijuna potpisa, a ustavni sud je prethodno zabranio acetamiprid zbog neadekvatne zaštite.

French Agriculture Minister Didier Barbut resigned after the government passed a controversial farm bill allowing the use of certain pesticides linked to environmental concerns. The decision came amid intense political pressure and public backlash over the legislation's provisions. Barbut announced his resignation in a LinkedIn post, stating that the conditions for remaining in the government were no longer being met. He submitted his resignation to President Emmanuel Macron following discussions with the prime minister. The bill, which was approved by parliament, includes measures permitting the use of acetamiprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, on hazelnuts under a special waiver, and flupyradifurone on sugar beets, apples, and cherries. These pesticides have been widely criticized for their potential harm to bees and other pollinators, as well as broader ecological damage. Environmental groups and small-scale farmer unions have condemned the bill, arguing that it favors large agribusinesses while disregarding scientific evidence highlighting the dangers to biodiversity and human health. Greenpeace called the legislation a “disgrace,” emphasizing its failure to address long-standing concerns about pesticide safety. Meanwhile, the sugar industry has defended the measures, claiming that these chemicals are essential for protecting crops from aphid infestations, which have caused significant losses in recent harvests. The proposed waivers require approval from France’s national health and safety agency, Anses, and are limited to a maximum of three years. This regulatory framework has drawn criticism from activists who argue that the temporary nature of the exemptions undermines long-term environmental protections. A petition opposing the bill collected more than two million signatures last year, setting a new record for online petitions on the National Assembly’s platform. This widespread public opposition reflects deepening tensions between agricultural interests and environmental advocacy. In 2023, France’s constitutional court previously ruled against the reintroduction of acetamiprid due to inadequate safety measures. Despite this legal setback, the current bill seeks to reintroduce similar provisions, raising questions about the government’s commitment to adhering to judicial rulings. Environmentalists have pointed to the lack of robust monitoring and mitigation strategies as a key flaw in the legislation, warning that the approved pesticides could exacerbate existing ecological threats. Political fallout from the bill has already begun to surface, with Barbut’s resignation signaling a major shift within the government. His departure comes as the Ministry of Agriculture faces increasing scrutiny over its handling of environmental policies. Some lawmakers have expressed support for the bill, citing economic pressures faced by farmers, while others have distanced themselves from the decision, fearing reputational damage from the controversy. As the debate continues, the focus will likely turn to how the government addresses the growing divide between agricultural producers and environmental advocates. With Anses yet to finalize its assessment of the proposed waivers, the situation remains fluid. The outcome of this process will determine whether the legislation proceeds as planned or faces further legal or political challenges. For now, the resignation of a senior minister underscores the high stakes involved in balancing economic and environmental priorities in French agriculture policy.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

1 izvještaja

Daily Maverick logoDaily MaverickNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 78prije 16 h
Francuski ministar podnosi ostavku jer poljoprivredni zakon otvara vrata spornim pesticidima

Francuski ministar podnio je ostavku zbog kontroverznog poljoprivrednog zakona koji dopušta upotrebu određenih pesticida pod izuzećem. Zakon dopušta acetamiprid, neonikotinoidni pesticid, za lešnike i flupiradifuron za šećerne repe, jabuke i trešnje. Ekološke grupe i sindikati malih poljoprivrednika tvrde da zakon favorizira veliki poljoprivredni biznis i zanemaruje znanstvene zabrinutosti o šteti oprašivačima i ekosustavima, a Greenpeace ga naziva "sramotom". Šećerna industrija brani pesticide kao potrebne za borbu protiv štetočina poput ptica. Odricanje zahtijeva odobrenje francuske zdravstvene agencije, Anses, i ograničeno je na tri godine. Peticija protiv zakona prikupila je preko dva milijuna potpisa, a ustavni sud je prethodno zabranio acetamiprid zbog neadekvatne zaštite.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se navodi da kontroverza oko poljoprivrednog zakona favorizira veliku agroindustriju na štetu interesa okoliša i malih poljoprivrednika, navodeći protivljenje ekoloških aktivista i sindikata.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article provides detailed information based on multiple sources including quotes from the French minister, references to environmental campaigns, union statements, and legal actions. It cites specific pesticide names, affected crops, and mentions the role of Anses and the constitutional court, a

Zašto objektivnost (78): The article presents both sides of the debate, mentioning environmental concerns and support from the sugar industry. However, it leans slightly towards highlighting the criticism from environmental groups and uses emotionally charged terms like 'disgrace' from Greenpeace, which may influence reader

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče