Francuska ponovno uvodi "pesticide koji štete pčelama", ministar okoliša podnosi ostavku

France has reinstated the use of two pesticides linked to bee harm, prompting the environment minister to announce her resignation. The decision follows a legislative process that saw both chambers of parliament approve the measure, despite widespread opposition from environmental groups and some political factions. The bill, which allows the use of acetamiprid and flupyradifurone, was passed by the National Assembly early Tuesday and later endorsed by the Senate, which voted 214 to 111 in favor. Environment Minister Monique Barbut informed her staff that she would resign, stating she had “no other option” than to submit her resignation to President Emmanuel Macron by early Wednesday. Her departure comes amid growing tensions over agricultural policies and environmental protection. Supporters of the move argue that the pesticides are essential for French farmers, particularly those cultivating sugar beets, apples, and hazelnuts, who face competitive disadvantages compared to producers in other EU countries. Acetamiprid and flupyradifurone are permitted throughout the European Union, though they were previously banned in France due to concerns about their effects on pollinators. Proponents claim the pesticides are necessary to maintain economic viability within the region’s agricultural sector. Environmental advocates and scientific organizations have raised alarms about the potential dangers of these chemicals. Research indicates that acetamiprid can impair honeybees' ability to forage and affect their memory functions. A 2024 study further suggested that flupyradifurone might be lethal to certain species of bees. These findings have fueled criticism from groups such as Greenpeace, which condemned the legislation as a disregard for public health and ecological safety. The legislative battle has been marked by legal challenges. Last year, the Constitutional Council ruled against a similar attempt to reintroduce acetamiprid, citing risks to human health following a petition signed by over two million citizens. The ruling was a setback for lawmakers led by Senator Laurent Duplomb, who had supported the earlier proposal. Despite this, the current bill managed to secure enough support to pass, largely due to backing from the far-right and centrist factions in the National Assembly. Left-wing members of the lower house opposed the reintroduction, with many expressing concern over the implications for environmental policy and public health. Some have indicated they plan to challenge the new law before the Constitutional Council, should the Senate’s approval proceed. This potential legal action underscores the deep divisions within the political landscape regarding agricultural practices and environmental regulation. Agriculture Minister Annie Genevard has defended the decision, asserting that the measures are necessary to address farmer dissatisfaction following recent protests. She emphasized that health authorities will oversee the use of the pesticides, ensuring they are only deployed under specific conditions, such as during emergencies, and that their application will avoid adverse impacts on human health or the environment. As the debate continues, the outcome of any potential legal appeals will shape the future of pesticide regulations in France. Meanwhile, the resignation of the environment minister signals a shift in political priorities, highlighting the ongoing struggle between agricultural interests and environmental protections. The next steps will likely involve further scrutiny from regulatory bodies and continued advocacy from environmental groups seeking to safeguard bee populations and broader ecosystems.