ON
← Natrag na feed
Kompanijska tajna: Apple tuži ChatGPT tvrtku Open AI
Germany🏛️ PolitikaBliže progresivnomprije 3 dana

Kompanijska tajna: Apple tuži ChatGPT tvrtku Open AI

Apple je optužio Open AI i dva bivša zaposlenika za krađu firmijskih tajni. Bivši Appleov dizajner Tang Tan, sada šef hardvera Open AI-a, optužen je da je dao povjerljive informacije o iPhone-u tvrtki KI. Osim toga, zaposlenik Apple-a tijekom intervjua za Open AI uzeo je dijelove konstrukcije kako bi dobio pristup povjerljivim podacima. Još jedan bivši Apple-ov zaposlenik optužen je već kao prekršio povjerljive podatke Open AI-a.

Apple has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging that the artificial intelligence company stole trade secrets from the tech giant. The legal action centers around claims that OpenAI encouraged former Apple employees to leak confidential information, including internal documents and supplier data. According to the complaint, two high-ranking ex-employees of Apple, Tang Tan and Chang Liu, are also named as defendants. The case highlights growing tensions between the two companies, particularly as OpenAI develops new products that could directly compete with Apple’s offerings. The lawsuit was filed following investigations by Apple, which concluded that Tang Tan, who previously worked at Apple for over 20 years and was responsible for designing the iPhone and Apple Watch, used confidential information to benefit OpenAI. Among other allegations, Apple claims that Tan encouraged current employees to bring parts of Apple's devices to job interviews at OpenAI. This, according to the lawsuit, represents part of a broader strategy by OpenAI to gain access to sensitive corporate data. Meanwhile, Chang Liu, another former Apple employee, allegedly accessed confidential data using a computer he had taken with him after leaving the company. Tang Tan is currently serving as hardware chief at OpenAI, playing a central role in the development of a new device aimed at leveraging artificial intelligence. His transition from Apple to OpenAI appears to have been pivotal in helping the latter attract talent from Apple. Jony Ive, Apple’s long-time design lead known for shaping the look of iPhones and MacBooks, was reportedly hired by OpenAI, further strengthening its position in attracting Apple employees. Tang Tan is described as the highest-ranking defector from Apple to date. According to the lawsuit, Apple believes that OpenAI systematically sought to acquire confidential information through these individuals. One specific instance cited involves an interview process where Apple employees were asked to bring components of their work to OpenAI interviews. Such actions, Apple argues, amount to industrial espionage and undermine competitive advantage. OpenAI has yet to formally respond to the allegations, though earlier reports indicated that the company had considered suing Apple itself for breach of contract. This potential conflict arose due to concerns that the partnership between Apple and OpenAI, which allows Apple users to route queries to ChatGPT when Siri cannot answer them, had not met expectations. However, OpenAI has since stated in a statement to Bloomberg that it has no interest in stealing secrets from other companies and remains focused on developing innovative technology. The relationship between Apple and OpenAI has evolved significantly over the years. Initially partners in integrating artificial intelligence into Apple devices, the collaboration has become increasingly complex as both firms expand their product lines. Apple’s recent accusations suggest that this partnership may be under strain, especially as OpenAI works on new technologies that could challenge Apple’s market position. The legal battle raises questions about the boundaries of competition in the tech industry and how companies protect their intellectual property. With both Apple and OpenAI investing heavily in artificial intelligence, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for future disputes involving trade secrets and employee mobility. As the investigation unfolds, more details are likely to emerge regarding the extent of alleged misconduct and the potential impact on both companies' operations.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Idi na primarne izvore (1)

Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.

3 izvještaja

Tagesschau (ARD) logoTagesschau (ARD)Državni / javniProgresivnoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 80prije 3 dana
Apple tuži OpenAI zbog navodne krađe poslovne tajne

Apple je podnio tužbu protiv OpenAI-a i optužio tvrtku da je ukrala poslovne tajne. Prema tužbi, bivši zaposlenici Apple-a su ohrabreni da otkriju povjerljive informacije. Dva visoka bivša zaposlenika Tang Tan, koji je sada šef hardvera u OpenAI-u, i Chang Liu, bivši elektroinženjer u Apple-u navodno su pristupili međunarodnim datotekama i podacima o dobavljačima. OpenAI je opovrgao optužbe i naglasio da se fokusira na inovacije.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): The Sprache je kritičan prema OpenAI-u, dok je Apple prikazan kao žrtva.

Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 80): This article provides clear and consistent facts from multiple sources. It maintains objectivity by presenting both Apple's allegations and OpenAI's response, though it leans slightly towards Apple's perspective in describing the situation.

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Neovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 3 dana
Kompanijska tajna: Apple tuži ChatGPT tvrtku Open AI

Apple je optužio Open AI i dva bivša zaposlenika za krađu firmijskih tajni. Bivši Appleov dizajner Tang Tan, sada šef hardvera Open AI-a, optužen je da je dao povjerljive informacije o iPhone-u tvrtki KI. Osim toga, zaposlenik Apple-a tijekom intervjua za Open AI uzeo je dijelove konstrukcije kako bi dobio pristup povjerljivim podacima. Još jedan bivši Apple-ov zaposlenik optužen je već kao prekršio povjerljive podatke Open AI-a.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Izvješća ostaju stvarna i usredotočena su na činjenice kao što su tužba, učesnici i veze između Apple-a i otvorene umjetne inteligencije.

Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 75): The article accurately reports Apple's lawsuit against OpenAI and details the involvement of ex-employees. It aligns with the cross-source consensus but uses emotionally charged terms like 'Strategie' which may imply intent beyond what is confirmed. The information is consistent across sources.

heise online logoheise onlineNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 70Objektivnost 60prije 3 dana
Apple tuži OpenAI zbog prikupljanja

Apple je optužio OpenAI i dva bivša zaposlenika u vezi s razvojem novog uređaja. Jedan od optuženih, Tang Tan, bio je ranije visoki dizajner u Appleu, a sada je šef hardvera u OpenAI-u. On je navodno koristio povjerljive informacije o dizajnu iPhonea kako bi pomogao OpenAI-u. Također se navodi da je još jedan bivši zaposlenik već kao OpenAI-ov zaposlenik pristupio povjerljivim podacima. Apple je optužen za OpenAI, da je pokušao dobiti tajne informacije.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Die Berichterstattung bleibt sachlich und berichtet neutral über die Vorwürfe von Apple gegen OpenAI sowie die Hintergründe der Klage. Ne daje se jasna politička smjernica ili emocionalna ocjena stranaka. Izvori se citiraju objektivno, bez određene pritužbe na

Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 70 · Objektivnost 60): The article starts with a different topic but then shifts to the Apple-OpenAI dispute. This mix-up reduces factuality as it introduces irrelevant information. Objectivity is also lower due to the confusing structure and potential bias in reporting.

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče