BAIn a crucial match during the World Cup, Croatia's goal by Mario Pašalić was disallowed after officials determined that Igor Matanović had touched the ball following a cross, placing Pašalić in an offside position. While the contact between Matanović and the ball was difficult to see with the naked eye, Matanović himself confirmed he felt contact. FIFA praised its technology, including chips in the balls that detect contact, but omitted a key rule stating that hair is only considered part of a player's body if it affects the ball's movement or trajectory. According to FIFA's guidelines, this would likely only apply in cases of significant contact involving large amounts of hair, such as a tuft at the top of the head. Had the referees applied this rule during Croatia's match in Toronto, the Croatian goal would not have been disallowed.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents the situation objectively, citing FIFA's rules and the players' statements without overtly favoring either side. It highlights the technical aspects of the decision and the potential implications for the game, maintaining a balanced tone.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article accurately reports the incident involving the goal being disallowed due to contact by Matanović, supported by FIFA's technology and the rule about hair not being considered part of the body unless it affects the ball's path. It provides details from the VAR explanation and the rule text.
