Settlers are accused of attacking a mosque in the West Bank village of Tuwani, setting it on fire and leaving Hebrew graffiti on its walls, according to Palestinian witnesses and local officials. The incident, which took place on July 19, 2026, saw more than two dozen settlers, some wearing masks, storm the Al-Taqwa mosque and ignite it. The attackers also torched two homes and a dairy factory operated by women from the Masafer Yatta community, according to Mohammed Rabie, head of the village council. Local volunteers managed to contain the fire before it spread further, preventing potential fatalities. The Israeli military and emergency services arrived approximately half an hour after the attack, inspecting the damage to the mosque and surrounding properties. Eyewitness accounts describe the attackers painting symbols including a Star of David and the phrase “I am under house arrest” on the mosque walls, referencing the nearby settlement of Havat Gilad. These markings are believed to be part of a broader pattern of intimidation and symbolic aggression against Palestinian religious sites. The attack occurred in full view of an Israeli military watchtower, according to Palestinian activist Osama Makhamra, highlighting the proximity of armed forces to the targeted location. Despite the presence of Israeli troops, the settlers were able to execute the attack and flee the scene. The police have launched an investigation into the incident, although they have not explicitly confirmed the arson accusations. The Palestinian religious affairs ministry condemned the attack, describing it as a “full-fledged terrorist act” and blaming Israel’s “extremist occupation government” for fostering settler violence aimed at displacing Palestinians and escalating the conflict into a religious war. The ministry’s criticism underscores growing concerns over the role of settler groups in escalating tensions in the region. Meanwhile, the Israeli police stated that arson investigators are examining both the recent attack on the mosque and a separate wildfire that consumed homes in Havat Gilad earlier in the week. In that case, initial investigations suggested the fire began with a cigarette discarded from a vehicle window. Separately, extremist settlers have been accused of stealing 200 goats from two Palestinian villages, Deir Ibzi and Ein Arik, in the central West Bank. According to footage shared by the peace advocacy group Peace Now, the settlers, some wearing religious garments and masks, drove the animals toward an illegal settlement outpost known as Beit Karnayim. The incident occurred in the presence of Israeli military personnel, who failed to intervene despite witnessing the theft. Three Palestinians who attempted to record the event had their phones confiscated by the IDF, and one individual was detained. The stolen livestock, valued at thousands of dollars, represents a significant economic loss for the affected communities. Peace Now criticized the Israeli government for failing to address the issue of settler violence, citing statements by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who referred to settler terrorism as a “spreading cancer.” The organization called for stricter measures against the settlers, including the dismantling of illegal outposts and the withdrawal of military support. This incident follows a trend of increasing settler activity targeting Palestinian livelihoods, particularly through the seizure of livestock. Such actions have led to the displacement of nearly 5,000 people from 59 Palestinian communities since the outbreak of hostilities following the Hamas attack in October 2023. Meanwhile, the Israeli military continues to face scrutiny over its handling of alleged war crimes during the Gaza conflict. An internal review of incidents involving civilian casualties, including the deaths of aid workers from the World Central Kitchen and the International Red Crescent, has been repeatedly postponed. The legal division of the Israeli Defense Forces, under the leadership of Major General Itay Offir, has delayed releasing findings on these matters, with sources suggesting external pressures may be influencing the delay. The situation reflects broader challenges in balancing transparency with security concerns, as Israeli officials remain wary of how information might be used by international courts. As the country prepares for upcoming elections, the timing of these revelations remains uncertain.
9 izvještaja
The Times of IsraelNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 75prije 15 danaU petak su izraelski doseljenici napali selo Jurish na Zapadnoj obali, u blizini Nablusa, pokušavajući provaliti u zgradu na periferiji grada. Palestinski mediji izvijestili su da su doseljenici pokušali prisilno ući u zgradu, a snimke pokazuju da se doseljenici pokušavaju fizički suprotstaviti palestinskim stanovnicima i aktivistima koji mu blokiraju ulaz. Kada su izraelske obrambene snage (IDF) stigle na mjesto događaja, nisu pritvorile doseljenike, nego im umjesto toga dopustile da pobjegnu. IDF je tada proglasio područje "zatvorenom vojnom zonom", praktično prisiljavajući aktiviste da napuste i potencijalno izlažu palestinske stanovnike daljnjoj agresiji doseljenika.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se izraelski naseljenici prikazuju kao legitimni i izvještava se o njihovoj sposobnosti da djeluju bez neposrednih posljedica, dok se neintervencija IDF-a prikazuje kao standardna praksa.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article provides a detailed account of the settler raid in Jurish, including the IDF's response and the subsequent military zone declaration. This aligns with the cross-source consensus on the incident.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article presents the event with a clear narrative, highlighting the actions of both settlers and the IDF. While it includes quotes from Palestinian sources, it maintains a generally neutral tone.
The Jerusalem PostNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 15 danaDana 17. srpnja 2026. u blizini prijelaza Tarqumiyah, sjeverno od Hebrona, na Zapadnoj obali, dogodio se pokušaj udaranja automobila.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su prikazane činjenične informacije o dva slučaja pokušaja udaranja automobila na Zapadnoj obali, s naglaskom na djelovanje sigurnosnih snaga i rezultate.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article reports a suspected car ramming near Hebron, describes the actions taken by IDF forces, and mentions a prior similar incident in Beit Ummar. It provides details from multiple sources including the IDF and Ynet, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it does not provide a prim
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article remains largely neutral, presenting facts about the incident and the IDF response. There is some emphasis on the ongoing security concerns but no overt bias or emotional language.
i24NEWSNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 19 danaČlanak izvještava da je šef izraelske vojske, šef IDF-a, upozorio da bi predloženi nacrt zakona o izuzeću mogao dovesti do sloma povjerenja među izraelskim vojnicima.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Iako je pitanje samo po sebi politički opterećeno, jezik koji se koristi podrazumijeva zabrinutost za održavanje jedinstva i discipline, što je bliže usklađeno s lijevim pogledima.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article references the IDF chief's warning about the draft exemption bill but lacks specific details or context beyond the headline claim. While plausible, the lack of direct quotes or specific policy details reduces the level of factual support compared to other articles.
Zašto objektivnost (80): The title suggests a strong stance against the draft exemption bill, potentially influencing reader perception. The article does not provide balanced analysis or opposing viewpoints on the issue.
The Times of IsraelNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 13 dana Naseljenici optuženi za spaljivanje, vandaliziranje džamije na Zapadnoj obali u noćnom napaduIzraelski doseljenici optuženi su za napad na džamiju u selu Tuwani na Zapadnoj obali, podmetnuvši joj vatru i ostavljajući hebrejski grafiti.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku je napad prikazan kao čin naseljačkog nasilja nad palestinskom imovinom, što se slaže s pripovijedima često povezanima s desničarskim perspektivama koje naglašavaju sigurnosne brige i kritiku palestinskih akcija.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article provides multiple sources including Palestinian witnesses, police statements, and photographs. It accurately describes the attack on the mosque, mentions the involvement of settlers, and includes details about the aftermath. However, it does not provide direct quotes from official invest
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article presents the events neutrally but uses emotionally charged language such as 'allegedly carried out by Israeli settlers' and references specific symbols like the Star of David. While it doesn't overtly take sides, the framing suggests a pattern of settler actions, which may influence read
The Times of IsraelNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 15 dana Palestinski terorist optužen za ubojstvo izraelskog civila na Zapadnoj obali 2007.Izraelski vojni glasnogovornik objavio je da je Shadi Jumaa, palestinski pojedinac, optužen za terorizam zbog ubojstva izraelskog civila Ido Zoldana na Zapadnoj obali 2007. godine. Incident se dogodio u blizini sela al-Funduq, gdje je Zoldan, 29-godišnji iz naselja Shavei Shomron, upucan tijekom ciljanog napada.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se navodi da je incident jasan čin terorizma koji je počinio palestinski pojedinac protiv izraelskih civila, u skladu s izraelskim državnim narativom.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article provides detailed information about a specific case involving a Palestinian indicted for a past murder. It includes names, dates, and official statements from the IDF, aligning with cross-source reporting. This level of detail supports high factuality.
Zašto objektivnost (75): While the article discusses a legal case, it maintains a neutral tone by presenting facts without overt political commentary. However, the emphasis on the individual as a 'terrorist' may slightly influence perception.
The Jerusalem PostNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prije 16 dana Hamas ne može provesti terorističku infiltraciju, ponavljanje 7. listopada, zapovjednik IDF-a kaže vojnicimaGlavni zapovjednik IDF-a general-major Avi Bluth rekao je vojnicima da Hamas više nije u stanju provesti masovnu terorističku infiltraciju sličnu napadu od 7. listopada.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se vojna djelovanja IDF-a prikazuju kao nužna i opravdana, naglašavajući strateške dobitke Izraela i smanjenu prijetnju koju predstavlja Hamas.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reports the IDF commander's claim that Hamas cannot conduct another terror infiltration like October 7. It references military control percentages of Gaza, which are consistent with other reports. However, the exact figures (67%-70%) are not independently verified, and the art
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article presents the IDF commander's statements objectively but frames the situation in a way that emphasizes Israeli military success. While it acknowledges Hamas's continued threat, the overall tone leans toward highlighting Israeli achievements rather than providing a balanced view of the ong
The Times of IsraelNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 65prije 11 dana Ekstremistički naseljenici ukrali su 200 koza iz dva palestinska selaIzraelski doseljenici navodno su ukrali 200 koza iz dva palestinska sela, Deir Ibzi i Ein Arik, u središnjoj Zapadnoj obali, prema Peace Now-u. Snimak koji je dobio Peace Now prikazuje počinitelje, identificirane kao židovske mlade osobe koje nose vjerske odjeće i neke maskirane, koji voze životinje prema ilegalnom naseljenom postaji. Incident se dogodio u prisutnosti vojnika IDF-a, koji nisu intervenirali, a palestinski stanovnici koji su pokušali zaustaviti krađu bili su pretučeni i prsnuti paprikom. Jedan Palestinac je bio pritvoren od strane IDF-a, a stanovnici su izvijestili da su vojnici i doseljenici zaplijenili telefone tri osobe koje su snimile događaj. IDF je kasnije povratio 35 koza iz tog područja, ali ni IDF ni policija nisu komentirali incident.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se djela doseljenika opisuju kao kriminalna i politički motivirana, koristeći izraze kao što su 'ekstremistički doseljenici', 'teroristi' i 'širenje raka'.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article provides detailed information about the alleged theft of 200 goats by extremist settlers, citing Peace Now and including specific locations and actions. However, it does not provide direct confirmation from the IDF or police, leaving room for potential inaccuracies or unverified claims.
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article uses strong language such as 'extremist settlers,' 'illegal farming settlement outpost,' and mentions that settlers 'beaten Palestinian residents and sprayed them with pepper spray.' These descriptions may reflect a biased perspective, potentially inflaming tensions rather than presentin
The Jerusalem PostNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 75Objektivnost 65prije 12 dana Otvaranje istrage o navodnim ratnim zločinima u Gazi opet odgođeno, izvor kašnjenja nejasan - ekskluzivnoJerusalem Post izvještava da je pravni odjel Izraelskih obrambenih snaga (IDF) više puta odgađao objavljivanje nalaza iz istraga o navodnim ratnim zločinima tijekom rata u Gazi. U početku se očekivalo da će vojni generalni odvjetnik IDF-a, general-major Itay Offir, objaviti velike odluke o nekoliko visokoprofilnih incidenata, uključujući zračni napad na Svjetsku središnju kuhinju 2024. i incident Međunarodnog crvenog polumjeseca 2025., što je rezultiralo civilnim žrtvama. Međutim, objavljivanje je ponovno odgođeno, a izvor kašnjenja ostaje nejasan. Iako je ministarstvo pravde navodno podržalo izvorni raspored, ministarstvo vanjskih poslova nije poreklo da je tražilo odgađanje izvješća. Ured premijera je porekao da je odgovoran za to, ali su se izraelski čelnici povijesno opirali transparentnosti potencijalnih ratnih zločina, posebno onih koji uključuju Međunarodni krivični sud (ICC).
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se navodi da je kašnjenje posljedica vanjskih pritisaka, posebno iz Ministarstva vanjskih poslova i općeg otpora transparentnosti izraelskog vodstva.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article reports on delays in the IDF's Gaza war crimes probe, citing sources within the IDF legal division and external pressures. It mentions specific incidents like the World Central Kitchen and Red Crescent events, aligning with known historical events. While it references statements from the
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article presents information from multiple sources but maintains a somewhat critical tone toward the Israeli government's handling of the issue. It frames the delay as potentially influenced by external pressures, which may imply a bias against the government's stance. Emotional language is limi
The Times of IsraelNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 70Objektivnost 65prije 9 dana Izraelski muškarac teško ranjen u nožem u blizini zapadne obale; ubijeni palestinski napadačiDva izraelska muškarca teško su ranjena u odvojenim palestinskim napadima nožem u blizini naselja na Zapadnoj obali 23. srpnja 2026. godine. U prvom incidentu, izraelski muškarac po imenu Itamar Cohen je izboden u blizini poljoprivrednog postaja Derech Avraham dok je pomagao u gašenju požara, nakon sukoba između Izraelaca i Palestinaca.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se navode teroristički napadi koje su počinili Palestinci protiv izraelskih civila, naglašavajući prijetnju koju predstavljaju "terorističke organizacije" i pozivajući na odgovor "gvozdenom šakom".
Zašto činjenice (70): The article reports conflicting information regarding the cause of the fire and the identity of the attackers. It mentions the IDF initially blaming Palestinians but later retracting that claim. This inconsistency reduces the reliability of the facts presented, though it does include medical details
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article has a somewhat biased tone, particularly in the way it frames the initial accusation against Palestinians and the subsequent retraction. The language used ('terrorists') and the emphasis on the IDF's actions suggest a pro-Israeli perspective, even if not overtly partisan.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
IL
