Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said on Sunday that President Donald Trump favors continuing daily strikes on Iran, even as the attacks paused for the weekend after nearly two weeks of targeting Iranian infrastructure. Kennedy expressed support for the ongoing military pressure, suggesting that such actions are necessary to deter Iran's aggressive behavior. He emphasized the importance of maintaining economic sanctions and military operations to weaken Iran’s ability to threaten U.S. interests. The pause in strikes followed a 13-day campaign of missile and drone attacks aimed at Iranian military sites, particularly near the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime route for global energy trade. The strikes were part of a broader effort to disrupt Iran’s capacity to challenge Western powers and its allies. However, the temporary halt raised questions about the effectiveness of the current approach and whether diplomatic channels might be being explored. Some analysts speculated that indirect negotiations could be underway, though no official confirmation has been released. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arizona) echoed similar sentiments during a recent interview on the “Hugh Hewitt Show.” Cotton argued that completing the military operational plan and imposing a sustained economic blockade would be the most effective long-term strategy. He suggested that lifting the blockade periodically could serve as a deterrent, ensuring that Iran remains unable to threaten U.S. security or develop nuclear capabilities. According to Cotton, this approach would also help maintain the free flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, keeping fuel costs stable for American consumers. The administration’s stance aligns with public sentiment reflected in a recent survey conducted by McLaughlin & Associates. Among 1,000 general election voters, 72% agreed that Iran should not be allowed to block, attack, mine, or extort ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Additionally, 62% believed the U.S. must complete its mission against Iran to prevent the country from acquiring nuclear weapons and threatening American lives. These figures highlight broad public support for a continued military and economic pressure strategy, despite the current pause in direct attacks. The survey also noted that support for a decisive approach extends beyond traditional conservative circles. A majority of Democrats and Independents endorsed the idea of finishing the job in Iran, indicating that the issue resonates across political lines. Tea Party Patriots Action Chairman Jenny Beth Martin highlighted these findings, stating that the results reflect a national consensus favoring President Trump’s policies toward Iran. Military officials have confirmed that the U.S. conducted its 13th consecutive night of strikes against Iranian targets earlier this week. These attacks targeted key infrastructure and military installations, aiming to degrade Iran’s strategic capabilities. Despite the pause, the administration has signaled readiness to escalate tensions if Iran does not comply with demands to cease hostile activities. Reports suggest that President Trump is considering a larger-scale operation, potentially surpassing previous levels of engagement, in response to Iran’s refusal to accept a ceasefire. As the situation unfolds, the focus remains on balancing immediate military action with long-term strategic goals. While some lawmakers advocate for a continuation of the current campaign, others emphasize the need for a comprehensive strategy that includes both military and diplomatic elements. With public opinion firmly aligned with the administration’s position, the likelihood of renewed hostilities appears high unless Iran demonstrates a willingness to alter its adversarial posture. The coming days will likely determine whether the pause marks a tactical shift or a temporary setback in the broader conflict with Iran.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj