Razbijanje neutemeljenih tvrdnji o problemima s glasačkim strojevima
FactCheck.org se bavi viralnim tvrdnjama na društvenim mrežama u kojima se navodi da elektronički glasački strojevi u državama kao što su Texas, Južna Karolina i Tennessee namjerno mijenjaju demokratske glasove u republikanske. Organizacija zaključuje da nema dokaza koji podržavaju namjerno miješanje, napominjući da stručnjaci pripisuju prijavljene kvarove standardnim problemima kalibracije zaslona na dodir ili pogrešci birača. Kontroverza je stekla traction nakon što je Stella Parton objavila na Facebooku o svom iskustvu s mašinom koja je bila u nesukladnosti s republikanskom kandidatkinjom Marsha Blackburn tijekom ranog glasanja u Tennesseeju. David Becker, voditelj Centra za izborne inovacije i istraživanja, opisao je takve pritužbe kao ponavljajuće u svakom većem izbornom ciklusu od 2008. godine. Objasnio je da dok se stariji elektronički uređaji za direktno snimanje povremeno suočavaju s problemima kalibracije, većina modernih grešaka uređaja za označavanje glasačkih listića proizlazi iz ljudske greške, a ne iz kvarova sustava. Osim toga, članak naglašava da gotovo cijela Sjedinjene Države koriste proces koji zahtijeva od birača da pregledaju papirnat glasanje prije konačnog glasanja, pružajući sloj provjere.
Social media users have circulated claims that electronic voting machines are altering voter choices or displaying messages regarding candidate popularity. These assertions emerged primarily from posts discussing incidents in Tennessee, Texas, and South Carolina, as well as a specific case in Cook County, Illinois. Elections experts and state officials have rejected the notion of deliberate tampering, attributing the reported glitches to standard calibration errors or user mistakes. In most jurisdictions, the final count relies on a physical paper ballot rather than the digital screen, providing multiple layers of verification before a vote is tallied. The controversy gained momentum following a complaint by Stella Parton, sister of the late Dolly Parton, who posted on Facebook on October 21. She stated that she had to return to the voting station three times to correct her selection because the machine repeatedly defaulted to Marsha Blackburn. Blackburn, a Republican senator from Tennessee, is currently running for governor against Democrat Jerri Green. The Cook Political Report assesses that race as solid Republican. Local news outlet WSMV-TV in Nashville reported on October 21 that several early voters encountered similar difficulties where the electronic interfaces did not accurately mark their intended choices. Mark Goins, the State Coordinator of Elections in Tennessee, addressed the reports in a statement to local media. He clarified that the situation does not involve vote flipping. Instead, he suggested the issue stems from unintended touches that voters might not realize they have made. Goins emphasized that numerous safeguards exist between the initial selection on the machine and the processing of the ballot. Voters view a review screen of their choices before the device prints the completed ballot. This paper document can be inspected again before insertion into the scanner. Goins noted that the actual counting occurs via the paper ballot entering the scanner, not through the screen data. For a vote to be recorded incorrectly, every check and balance in the process would need to fail simultaneously. David Becker, executive director and founder of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, discussed the phenomenon during a press briefing on October 22. He characterized the complaints as recurring, noting that similar allegations appear in almost every election cycle since 2008. Becker explained that some jurisdictions, including parts of Tennessee, utilize direct recording electronic machines, an older technology susceptible to minor calibration issues. However, he argued that for modern ballot marking devices, nearly all claims of altered votes result from human error. Becker added that if a printed ballot does not reflect a voter's intent, the individual can discard it and cast a new ballot. The Tennessee secretary of state's office did not respond to inquiries regarding these specific claims. Separate allegations arose in Cook County, Illinois, involving a viral video of a woman claiming her voting machine displayed a warning about her chosen candidate's unpopularity. The woman, identified as living in Streamwood, stated she selected Republican judges and received a notification suggesting people were not typically choosing that person. She claimed the message vanished after she made three selections in that race. Popular accounts on the social platform X reshared the clip, framing it as evidence of rigged elections and citing Dominion Voting Systems as the equipment vendor. Monica Gordon, the Cook County Clerk, labeled the account false and misleading. She stated that voting equipment does not provide information on candidate popularity nor discourage specific selections. Instead, machines display alerts when a voter fails to make all available selections in a race, a condition known as an undervote. Sally Daly, deputy clerk of communications at the Cook County Clerk's Office, confirmed that there were no Republican judicial candidates on the ballot, contradicting the woman's initial description. The woman later conceded she had mistakenly referenced the wrong race but maintained she saw the notification. Aris Garcia, the Streamwood Village Clerk, said officials attempted to replicate the reported message but could not reproduce the experience. Daly noted that this was the only such report received in a jurisdiction with approximately 1.8 million registered voters. Cook County utilizes the ImageCast X ballot marking device manufactured by Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion was acquired by Liberty Vote, a firm established by Scott Leiendecker, a former Republican election official. Liberty Vote directed inquiries to Gordon's official statement. Federal certification standards require voting equipment to issue warnings for undervotes or overvotes, allowing voters a second opportunity to correct potential mistakes before finalizing their ballots.
Idi na primarne izvore (2)
Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.
Viralni postovi na društvenim mrežama tvrdili su da se na glasačkim strojevima u okrugu Cook, Illinois, prikazuju poruke koje ukazuju na to da su određeni kandidati nepopularni, navodeći izbornu prevaru. Jedna žena koja se pojavljuje u video snimcima izjavila je da je nakon što je odabrala suca, na ekranu joj se pojavilo upozorenje da 'ljudi obično ne biraju ovu osobu'. Međutim, urednica okruga Cook, Monica Gordon i drugi izborni dužnosnici su porekli te tvrdnje, objašnjavajući da strojevi ne prate ili ne prikazuju popularnost kandidata. Dužnosnici su objasnili da je upozorenje koje je glasač vjerojatno vidio standardna obavijest o "podglasu", koja se pojavljuje kada glasač ne odabere sve dostupne opcije u utrci za više mjesta. Osim toga, dužnosnici su primijetili da nema republikanskih sudskih kandidata na konkretnom glasačkom listiću koji je žena opisala, što je u suprotnosti s dijelom njenog početnog svjedočenja.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak funkcionira kao provjera činjenica koja demantira određenu teoriju zavjere u vezi s integritetom izbora. Ona predstavlja viralnu tvrdnju zajedno s izravnim opovrgavanjem iz službenih izvora okruga i tehničkim objašnjenjima mehanizma glasačkog sustava. Oslanjajući se na primarne izvore (grafski službenici, državni
Zašto činjenice (95): Accurately reports the specific viral claim regarding Cook County, Illinois, and correctly identifies the technical explanation (undervote alerts vs. popularity notifications) based on standard voting machine functionality and the cited official response. While it does not address the primary source
Zašto objektivnost (85): Maintains a neutral, journalistic tone focused on debunking misinformation. Uses clear headings and attributes claims to specific sources (viral accounts vs. officials) without injecting editorial bias.
FactCheck.org se bavi viralnim tvrdnjama na društvenim mrežama u kojima se navodi da elektronički glasački strojevi u državama kao što su Texas, Južna Karolina i Tennessee namjerno mijenjaju demokratske glasove u republikanske. Organizacija zaključuje da nema dokaza koji podržavaju namjerno miješanje, napominjući da stručnjaci pripisuju prijavljene kvarove standardnim problemima kalibracije zaslona na dodir ili pogrešci birača. Kontroverza je stekla traction nakon što je Stella Parton objavila na Facebooku o svom iskustvu s mašinom koja je bila u nesukladnosti s republikanskom kandidatkinjom Marsha Blackburn tijekom ranog glasanja u Tennesseeju. David Becker, voditelj Centra za izborne inovacije i istraživanja, opisao je takve pritužbe kao ponavljajuće u svakom većem izbornom ciklusu od 2008. godine. Objasnio je da dok se stariji elektronički uređaji za direktno snimanje povremeno suočavaju s problemima kalibracije, većina modernih grešaka uređaja za označavanje glasačkih listića proizlazi iz ljudske greške, a ne iz kvarova sustava. Osim toga, članak naglašava da gotovo cijela Sjedinjene Države koriste proces koji zahtijeva od birača da pregledaju papirnat glasanje prije konačnog glasanja, pružajući sloj provjere.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak usvaja pristup provjere činjenica koji se u velikoj mjeri oslanja na konsenzus stručnjaka i tehnička objašnjenja kako bi razotkrili određene teorije zavjere. Ona predstavlja stavove istraživača o izbornoj sigurnosti i upućuje se na lokalne vijesti o početnim pritužbama bez usvajanja partijskog
Zašto činjenice (90): Correctly cites the WSMV-TV report date and details, accurately summarizes the social media spread involving Stella Parton, and aligns with the primary source's assertion that issues trace back to user error or calibration rather than deliberate tampering. The summary of the expert consensus matches
Zašto objektivnost (80): Adopts a direct, corrective tone typical of fact-checking organizations ('Dispelling Unfounded Claims'). While slightly more assertive in dismissing the claims as 'unfounded,' it relies on cited expert opinion and maintains professional neutrality regarding the political parties involved.
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.
progresivno
sredina
konzervativno
★
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.