A Senate committee is preparing to examine allegations of "ghost" infrastructure projects in Taguig City, following reports submitted by Senator Panfilo "Ping" Lacson. The blue ribbon committee, chaired by Senator Erwin Tulfo, will assess Lacson's findings to determine which allegations, witnesses, and specific projects require further scrutiny. Tulfo emphasized the seriousness of the matter, stating the committee would act accordingly once Lacson provides his documentation. The inquiry could begin as early as next week, pending the outcome of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s State of the Nation Address on Monday. Lacson raised concerns about potential double appropriation in two P100-million allocations for a slope protection project in Taguig City. According to his recent social media post, these allocations appeared to cover the same project, suggesting one of them could be classified as a "ghost" project. Earlier, Lacson indicated that his team had identified at least two case studies involving suspected ghost infrastructure projects in Taguig, which falls within the political jurisdiction of Senate Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano. Lacson previously highlighted multiple slope protection and drainage projects in Taguig, valued at approximately P100 million each, totaling P2.085 billion. These figures were drawn from what he claimed were P6.79 billion in budget insertions made by Cayetano under the 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA). Additionally, Lacson alleged that a Taguig City engineer had used two aliases in casinos, accumulating nearly P500 million in combined winnings and losses at a Metro Manila establishment. However, he has not yet publicly identified the individual or presented evidence to support these claims. Cayetano refuted the allegations, asserting that there were no ghost projects in Taguig City. During a Facebook live session, he challenged Lacson to investigate other highly urbanized cities such as Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Makati, and Parañaque, rather than focusing solely on Taguig due to their personal feud. Cayetano claimed that the Office of the Ombudsman had already confirmed the absence of ghost projects in Taguig during an interview in 2025. His office had also conducted its own review of the city's projects and found no evidence of ghost projects. The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) has initiated an investigation into the alleged ghost infrastructure projects in Taguig City. NBI Director Melvin Matibag confirmed the agency's involvement during an ambush interview, citing previous projects in Taguig that were connected to the top 15 named contractors in 2022. Matibag noted that the timing of the investigation was coincidental but acknowledged the public nature of Lacson's claims. Cayetano expressed skepticism regarding the NBI's focus on Taguig's flood control projects, particularly given the agency's simultaneous investigation into alleged funding irregularities involving the New Clark City sports complex used during the 2019 Southeast Asian Games. Cayetano, who chaired the Philippine Southeast Asian Games Organizing Committee, questioned the timing of the NBI's actions, especially considering Matibag's upcoming testimony in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. Lacson intensified the dispute by claiming that Cayetano belonged in the Payatas, Quezon City jail due to alleged corruption. This assertion followed Cayetano's claim that Lacson's and Senator Erwin Tulfo's net worth had more than doubled. Lacson denied the allegations, stating that his earnings were legitimate and derived from real estate dealings and other business ventures. He reiterated his commitment to gathering evidence to substantiate his claims against Cayetano. Lacson also disclosed that former congressman Lino Cayetano, the brother of Senators Alan and Pia Cayetano, had offered to assist in the investigation into alleged ghost projects in Taguig. Lino Cayetano, currently serving as the general manager of PTV 4, suggested he possessed knowledge of numerous ghost projects in the city. Lacson pledged to thoroughly investigate these claims without fabricating evidence. Cayetano responded to Lacson's allegations by highlighting that flooding was not a significant issue in Taguig City, unlike other areas in the Philippines and Metro Manila. He pointed out that Lacson had been photographed with members of the Discayas family, implying that the scrutiny should extend beyond Taguig. Despite these exchanges, Cayetano maintained that his office had verified the absence of ghost projects in the city, urging Lacson to broaden his investigation to include other urban centers.
10 izvještaja
Senatski odbor razmatra nalaze Lacsonove o Taguigovim "duhovima" projektimaSenatski odbor na čelu s senatorom Ervinom Tulfom planira preispitati nalaze senatora Panfila 'Pinga' Laxona u vezi s navodnim 'duhovnim' infrastrukturnim projektima u Taguig Cityju. Ti projekti uključuju sumnjivo duplirane dodjele sredstava, uključujući potencijalne dvostruke odobrenje za jedan projekt zaštite padina.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Članak naglašava istrage navodne korupcije i zlouporabe javnih sredstava, usredotočujući se na postupke koje je poduzeo jedan senator protiv druge istaknute ličnosti u političkom okruženju.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article accurately reports that the Senate blue ribbon committee may examine Lacson's findings and quotes Tulfo's statements. It aligns well with the primary source regarding the potential for an inquiry into alleged corruption.
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article maintains a balanced perspective, quoting both Lacson and Tulfo without showing preference for either side in the unfolding situation.
Matibag dovodi u pitanje Pia Cayetano-ovu "možda prezrenu" primjedbuDirektor Nacionalnog istražnog biroa (NBI) Melvin Matibag odgovorio je na kritike senatora-suca Pia Cayetana o njegovoj odluci da istraži navodne nepravilnosti u financiranju u sportskom kompleksu New Clark City koji se koristio tijekom Igara jugoistočne Azije 2019. Cayetano je opisao akciju NBI-ja kao "možda prezrenu", što je Matibag odbacio kao više od same istrage. Naglasio je da je istraga odvojena od suđenja za opoziv potpredsjednice Sare Duterte, o kojem će svjedočiti pred senatskim sudom za opoziv 21. srpnja.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja obje perspektive - Cayetanoovu kritiku i Matibagovu obranu - bez da otvoreno favorizira jednu stranu.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article summarizes key developments in the impeachment trial, including the legal battle over financial records and the prosecution's arguments. It accurately reflects the primary source document's content and timeline.
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both sides of the legal dispute without taking a clear stance. It avoids emotional language and sticks to factual reporting.
Cayetano Lacsonu: Nema projekata duhova u Taguigu, nemojte nas izdvojitiSenator Alan Peter Cayetano negirao je optužbe senatora Panfila Laxona da u Taguig Cityju postoje projekti za kontrolu poplava. Cayetano je tvrdio da su Ured ombudsmana i njegov vlastiti ured pregledali gradske projekte i nisu pronašli takve probleme. Izazvao je Laxona da istraži druge visoko urbanizirane gradove umjesto da izdvoji Taguig, navodeći njihovu tekuću svađu.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Cayetano se brani od optužbi za korupciju i osporava Lacsonov fokus na Taguigu, dok Lacson optužuje Cayetana za financijsko nepošteno ponašanje.
Zašto činjenice (89): The article accurately reports Cayetano's denial of the existence of ghost projects in Taguig and his challenge to Lacson to investigate other cities. It includes direct quotes and references to prior investigations, maintaining alignment with the cross-source consensus on the ongoing debate.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article presents Cayetano's arguments clearly but frames them in a way that challenges Lacson's motives, implying a personal vendetta. This subtle framing may influence the reader's understanding of the conflict.
NBI istražuje projekte kontrole poplava u Cayetano bailiwick TaguigNacionalni istražni ured (NBI) istražuje navodne projekte kontrole poplava u Taguig Cityju, koji je pod utjecajem senatora Alana Petera Cayetana. To je uslijedilo nakon tvrdnji senatora Panfila Laxona da su ovi projekti uključivali prijevare.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se istraga prikazuje kao politički potez usmjeren protiv Cayetana, naglašavajući njegovo poricanje i kritiku NBI-jevog fokusa.
Zašto činjenice (88): The article provides detailed information about the NBI's investigation into the 'ghost' projects in Taguig, including quotes from NBI Director Melvin Matibag. It references previous statements by Cayetano and connects the investigation to Lacson's claims. The reporting aligns with the cross-source
Zašto objektivnost (75): While the article remains largely neutral, it emphasizes the seriousness of the investigation and the political implications, which could be seen as slightly biased. The focus on the NBI's actions and the potential consequences for Cayetano suggests a slight lean towards the investigative angle.
Lacson kaže Cayetano pripada u QC zatvor za navodnu korupcijuSenator Panfilo Lacson odgovorio je na tvrdnje senatora Alana Petera Cayetana da se njegova neto vrijednost više nego udvostručila, negirajući optužbe i tvrdeći da njegovo bogatstvo dolazi iz legitimnih nekretnina i poslovnih poduhvata.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): Članak predstavlja optužbe senatora Laxona protiv senatora Cayetana koristeći snažan jezik kao što je "pripada u Quezon City zatvor" i naglašava Lacsonovu obranu svog integriteta dok izdaje specifične optužbe protiv Cayetana.
Zašto činjenice (87): The article accurately captures Lacson's rebuttal to Cayetano's claims, including the specific figures regarding budget insertions and the status of the Taguig projects. It includes direct quotes and maintains consistency with the cross-source narrative of the ongoing controversy.
Zašto objektivnost (70): The article frames the dispute in a way that emphasizes Lacson's integrity and Cayetano's alleged misconduct. While the facts are reported accurately, the tone subtly supports Lacson's position, which may affect the perceived neutrality of the piece.
Lacson za Cayetano: Ti pripadaš zatvoruSenator Panfilo Lacson optužio je senatora Alana Petera Cayetana za korupciju i sugerirao da pripada u zatvoru, odgovarajući na Cayetanoove optužbe protiv njega. Lacson je tvrdio da je njegovo bogatstvo znatno poraslo od ostavke na dužnosti, pripisujući ga legitimnim investicijama u nekretnine i poslovnim poduhvatima.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): Članak predstavlja izravnu razmjenu između dva senatora, a Lacson koristi snažnu retoriku koja sugerira da Cayetano pripada u zatvoru, što situaciju prikazuje kao osobni napad umjesto uravnotežene rasprave o politici ili upravljanju.
Zašto činjenice (86): The article accurately reflects Lacson's response to Cayetano's allegations, including his denial of the net worth doubling claim and his assertion that Cayetano belongs in jail for corruption. It includes direct quotes and contextualizes the dispute within the larger political landscape. The facts
Zašto objektivnost (72): The language used by Lacson is strong and emotionally charged, suggesting a clear stance against Cayetano. While the article reports the content of his statements objectively, the overall tone supports Lacson's position, which may influence the reader's interpretation.
Lino Cayetano može svjedočiti o Taguigu gh Ghost projects LacsonSenator Panfilo Lacson najavio je da bi bivši kongresmen iz Taguig Lino Cayetano, koji je sada generalni direktor PTV4, mogao svjedočiti o navodnim "projektima duhova" u Taguig Cityju.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se prikazuju obje strane situacije bez da se otvoreno favorizira jedna perspektiva.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately describes the Senate blue ribbon committee's intention to review Lacson's findings and includes specific details about the double appropriation in Taguig. This aligns well with the primary source.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article remains largely neutral, focusing on procedural steps and statements from both Lacson and Tulfo. It avoids taking sides and presents the information in a balanced manner.
Cayetano kaže Dizonu da se odupre "tlaku" u Taguigovom projektu.Senator Alan Peter Cayetano pozvao je tajnika javnih radova Vincea Dizona da se odupre vanjskom pritisku u vezi s navodima da su neki projekti za kontrolu poplava u Taguig Cityju povezani s Cayetanom bili "projekti duhova". Dizon je izjavio da će naložiti okružnom inženjeru DPWH-a da istraži tvrdnje senatora Panfila "Pinga" Lacsona. Cayetano je tvrdio da je Dizon prethodno potvrdio da u Taguigu nema projekata duhova. Cayetano je pohvalio Dizonovu odlučnost, ali je upitao zašto je Dizon odlučio provjeriti tvrdnju nakon što ju je Lacson podigao.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja obje strane kontroverze: Cayetanoovu obranu projekata kontrole poplava i Dizonovu odluku da istraži.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports Cayetano's statement urging Dizon not to yield to pressure regarding the Taguig flood control projects. It includes direct quotes from Cayetano and mentions the context of Lacson's allegations. However, it does not provide full details of the verification process or th
Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat confrontational, especially in Cayetano's remarks where he criticizes Lacson's approach. The article presents both sides but leans slightly toward Cayetano's perspective, particularly in the framing of Lacson's accusations as unfounded.
Lacson: Najmanje dvije studije slučaja do sada za Taguigove "projektove duhova"U članku se navodi da je senator Panfilo Lacson spomenuo najmanje dvije studije slučaja vezane uz "projekte duhova" u Taguigu.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se pitanje "projekata duhova" postavlja kao pitanje odgovornosti i korupcije, što se poklapa s progresivnim zabrinutostima za transparentnost vlade.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article states Lacson has identified at least two case studies but lacks specific details about what these case studies involve. This makes it less detailed compared to the primary source, which provides more context about the nature of the alleged anomalies.
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article remains neutral in tone, simply stating facts without apparent bias towards either Lacson or Cayetano.
Ministarstvo pravosuđa i Palača podržavaju plan NBI-ja da se riješi problem održavanja SEA igaraMinistarstvo pravosuđa (DOJ) i filipinsko predsjedništvo javno su podržali odluku Nacionalnog istražnog biroa (NBI) o ponovnom otvaranju istrage o navodnim nepravilnostima povezanim s igrama u jugoistočnoj Aziji (SEA) 2019. godine.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni stavovi više zainteresiranih strana - Ministarstva pravosuđa, Palate i Senatora - bez da se otvoreno favorizira bilo koja strana.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article discusses the potential role of President Marcos in accessing Duterte's financial records, referencing past procedures. It aligns with the primary source document's context and provides relevant background information.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article slightly leans toward the prosecution's perspective by highlighting the importance of Marcos's involvement, though it remains largely neutral in its presentation.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
PH
