ON
← Natrag na feed
CJP marš: Policija kaže da uhićeni prosvjednici 'nisu studenti'; moguće još uhićenja
India🏛️ PolitikaSredinaprije 12 dana

CJP marš: Policija kaže da uhićeni prosvjednici 'nisu studenti'; moguće još uhićenja

Delhijska policija je izjavila da prosvjednici privedeni tijekom prosvjeda koji je organizirala Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) u blizini parlamenta nisu studenti, a vlasti su provjeravale njihove identitete. Visoki dužnosnici potvrdili su da se prijavljuju FIR-ovi koji se odnose na sukobe, oštećenje policijskih vozila i uništavanje javne imovine. Policija istražuje motive iza prosvjeda i ispituje video snimke, snimke CCTV-a i druge dokaze kako bi identificirala uključene osobe. Više od 100 prosvjednika uhićeno je na različitim mjestima, uključujući Parliament Street i Patel Chowk, a neki video zapisi pokazuju kako policija koristi silu protiv prosvjednika. Vlasti su naglasile da će pravna mjera biti poduzeta protiv odgovornih za napade na policiju i oštećenje imovine prosvjeda.

Delhi Police have confirmed that individuals detained during a recent protest organized by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) were not students, according to a senior official speaking anonymously to news agency PTI. The protests took place near Parliament and other key locations in central Delhi, where thousands gathered despite prohibitory orders issued under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The incident occurred on the opening day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, leading to one of the largest security operations in the region. Police reported that over 100 protesters were arrested from multiple locations, including Parliament Street, Patel Chowk, Constitution Club, and Shastri Bhawan, and transferred to various police stations and temporary detention centers across the city. According to police sources, the detentions followed violent clashes in which protesters reportedly hurled stones at security personnel, prompting a lathi charge by law enforcement. Video footage circulating on social media showed police using batons against demonstrators and obstructing their attempt to reach Parliament. These incidents sparked widespread concern among activists and civil society groups, who criticized the force used by police during the crackdown. A senior police officer stated that the department was actively investigating the motives behind the violence and had begun registering First Information Reports (FIRs) related to the damage caused to police vehicles and public property. The inquiry includes examining "outer side angles," suggesting a broader look into potential conspiracies or external influences. Authorities emphasized that anyone found responsible for attacking police personnel or causing damage would face strict legal consequences. The police have intensified their investigation, deploying teams to review video footage, CCTV recordings, and other forms of evidence to identify those involved in the violence. Officials noted that the verification of all available videos was ongoing, and appropriate legal actions would follow once the findings were confirmed. Further arrests are anticipated as the probe continues and additional suspects are identified through both technical analysis and field investigations. Social media platforms have played a crucial role in documenting the events, with users sharing clips of the confrontation between protesters and police. These videos have been scrutinized by authorities to determine the sequence of events and to identify individuals who allegedly participated in the violence. Despite these efforts, some discrepancies remain regarding the exact nature of the interactions and the extent of police involvement. Protesters had gathered in large numbers despite the prohibitory orders, indicating a strong determination to challenge the restrictions imposed by the government. Their attempts to breach the barricades set up around Parliament Street, Jantar Mantar, and other sensitive areas led to direct confrontations with security forces. The scale of the demonstration underscored the intensity of political tensions in the capital, particularly given the timing of the event coinciding with the start of the parliamentary session. Delhi Police have also clarified that certain individuals, such as Dipke, were not among those detained, addressing specific concerns raised by the public and media. This clarification aimed to dispel misinformation and provide clarity on the identities of those apprehended during the protest. As the investigation progresses, police continue to emphasize their commitment to ensuring justice while maintaining public order.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

2 izvještaja

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 12 dana
CJP marš: Policija kaže da uhićeni prosvjednici 'nisu studenti'; moguće još uhićenja

Delhijska policija je izjavila da prosvjednici privedeni tijekom prosvjeda koji je organizirala Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) u blizini parlamenta nisu studenti, a vlasti su provjeravale njihove identitete. Visoki dužnosnici potvrdili su da se prijavljuju FIR-ovi koji se odnose na sukobe, oštećenje policijskih vozila i uništavanje javne imovine. Policija istražuje motive iza prosvjeda i ispituje video snimke, snimke CCTV-a i druge dokaze kako bi identificirala uključene osobe. Više od 100 prosvjednika uhićeno je na različitim mjestima, uključujući Parliament Street i Patel Chowk, a neki video zapisi pokazuju kako policija koristi silu protiv prosvjednika. Vlasti su naglasile da će pravna mjera biti poduzeta protiv odgovornih za napade na policiju i oštećenje imovine prosvjeda.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se navodi činjenično izvješće policijskog odgovora na prosvjed, citirajući službene izjave i opisujući postupke koje su poduzele službe za provedbu zakona bez otvorene naklonosti bilo kojoj strani.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article provides detailed accounts from Delhi Police regarding the detainees, their verification process, and ongoing investigations. These details are consistent with the cross-source consensus and do not appear to contradict other reliable reports on the same event.

Zašto objektivnost (75): The article uses language such as 'detained protesters', 'strict legal action', and 'further arrests' which may imply a certain level of judgment or concern. While not overtly biased, the tone leans toward presenting the police actions as necessary and justified.

The Print logoThe PrintNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 80prije 12 dana
Dipke nije uhapšen, kaže policija Delhija.

Delhi policija je objasnila da Dipke nije pritvoren, obraćajući se nedavnim izvješćima ili tvrdnjama koje sugeriraju suprotno.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak sadrži jednostavnu izjavu policije Delhija koja poriče pritvor Dipkea. Nema očiglednog uokvirenja koji favorizira jednu stranu nad drugom, a sadržaj ostaje neutralan u tonu, fokusirajući se isključivo na objašnjenje policije bez dodatnih komentara ili konteksta koji bi ukazali

Zašto činjenice (75): The article reports that Delhi Police stated Dipke was not detained, aligning with the title. However, there is no primary source to verify this claim directly. It appears to be consistent with the cross-source consensus that some individuals were detained but not necessarily Dipke specifically.

Zašto objektivnost (80): The article presents information from Delhi Police without apparent bias, though it includes details about ongoing investigations and potential further arrests, which may reflect an official perspective rather than independent reporting.

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče