Sudija Ujjal Bhuyan, sudac Vrhovnog suda, komentirao je proces sudskih imenovanja, napominjući da su prethodne rezolucije kolegija bile podržane nekim razlozima, ali ti razlozi nisu bili sveobuhvatni.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Izjava se čini da je neutralno promatranje, a ne snažno strankarski poduzeti.
Zašto činjenice (65): The article reports a statement from Justice Ujjal Bhuyan regarding judicial appointments and the collegium's resolutions. While it does not provide a primary source document, it aligns with general knowledge about judicial appointment processes in India. The claim about the collegium's resolutions
Zašto objektivnost (70): The article presents the statement in a neutral manner, focusing on the content of the remark rather than expressing personal opinion. It uses formal language and avoids emotionally charged terms, maintaining a balanced tone.






