Anglikanska crkva poziva na proučavanje palestinskog kršćanskog dokumenta koji optužuje Izrael za genocid

The Church of England has urged its congregations to consider engaging with a controversial document authored by Palestinian Christians that accuses Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. This decision came after the church’s legislative body, the General Synod, passed a motion encouraging churches to listen to and reflect upon the text, titled Moment of Truth: Faith in a Time of Genocide, also known as Kairos II. The document was produced by the Palestinian Christian group Kairos Palestine and outlines claims that Israel’s military actions in Gaza constitute genocide, describe the state as a “colonial enterprise built on racism,” and frame the Israeli-Palestinian conflict around themes of occupation, apartheid, and settler colonialism. While the Synod did not endorse the document as official church teaching, it emphasized the importance of understanding the perspectives of Palestinian Christians. The motion sparked immediate concern among Jewish leaders in the United Kingdom. Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis had previously urged Synod members to reject the proposal, warning that the document could damage longstanding efforts to build positive relationships between Christians and Jews. He criticized Kairos II for containing “so much falsehood” and argued that its content risks undoing years of collaborative work aimed at fostering mutual respect and understanding. Mirvis described the text as “deeply concerning” and questioned its credibility as a legitimate expression of truth. Following the Synod’s decision, Phil Rosenberg, president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, issued a statement expressing his disappointment. He acknowledged that the authors of Kairos II might have been motivated by genuine anguish over the situation in the region but stressed that the document’s portrayal of history and identity was riddled with inaccuracies. Rosenberg warned that such distortions could exacerbate divisions rather than contribute to resolving the Middle East conflict. Archbishop of Canterbury Sarah Mullally addressed the Synod before the vote, acknowledging the pain and suffering of Palestinian Christians while also recognizing the concerns raised by Jewish leaders. In her remarks, she stated that she heard the cries of Palestinian Christians who endure hardship in Gaza and the West Bank. At the same time, she thanked the chief rabbi, representatives of the Movement for Progressive Judaism, and the Board of Deputies for voicing their apprehensions. Mullally reaffirmed the Church of England’s commitment to opposing antisemitism and ensuring the safety of both Israelis and Palestinians. The Synod’s deliberation took place shortly after Mullally visited the West Bank in June, where she met with Palestinian Christian communities in Birzeit. During that trip, she pledged to use her position as Archbishop to advocate for peace and justice for those living under occupation. Her engagement with local communities appears to have influenced the Synod’s approach to the Kairos II document, prompting a call for deeper dialogue and reflection rather than outright condemnation. The controversy surrounding Kairos II comes amid broader international debates over the definition of genocide in the context of the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Earlier this year, Pope Francis faced criticism from some Jewish groups after he endorsed an inquiry into whether Israel committed genocide during its military response to the Hamas attack on southern Israel. His stance highlighted the growing tensions within religious institutions regarding how to address the complex realities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As the Church of England moves forward with its directive to engage with Kairos II, it faces the challenge of balancing empathy for the experiences of Palestinian Christians with the need to uphold principles of accuracy and fairness. The Synod’s decision underscores the complexity of navigating sensitive political and theological issues, particularly in a climate marked by deepening regional and global divisions.