The International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) has abandoned a controversial plan to sell a minority stake in the commercial rights to the World Cup following intense opposition from regional football confederations. The governing body confirmed on Friday that it would not proceed with the proposal after just four days of mounting resistance from football authorities around the world, marking one of the most significant policy reversals of FIFA president Gianni Infantino’s tenure. The initial plan, announced earlier in the week, aimed to raise up to $4.2 billion by selling approximately a 20% stake in a newly created commercial entity that would oversee FIFA’s major tournaments, including the World Cup. FIFA stated that the investment would generate billions of dollars for football development programs globally. However, the proposal quickly sparked widespread backlash, with critics arguing that FIFA was placing one of the sport’s most valuable assets into private hands. Regional confederations accused FIFA of failing to adequately consult its members before unveiling the proposal, which many believed could fundamentally alter the commercial landscape of world football. Critics warned that the governing body was treating the World Cup as a financial asset rather than a cherished sporting tradition. After several days of escalating criticism, Infantino acknowledged that the proposal had become too divisive. "In having listened carefully to all the views, it has become clear that the project has created divisions of a nature that, regardless of the level of support, are no longer in the interest of the objective set out in the first place," Infantino said in a statement. "Our purpose has always been, and will always be, to unite and improve. As a result, this proposal will not proceed." Infantino added that FIFA would focus on rebuilding consensus with its stakeholders. "My intent is to bring all interested parties back together in the coming days and weeks in the spirit of shared interest in our game, and with the objective to continue growing football everywhere, particularly in those countries that mostly need our support." Opposition to the proposal gained momentum rapidly. UEFA, Europe’s governing football body, led the resistance, accusing FIFA of attempting to put the “soul” of football up for sale. On Thursday, all 55 UEFA member associations unanimously voted to boycott FIFA competitions unless the proposal was withdrawn, stating that the World Cup “cannot be treated as an investment product.” The Confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football (CONCACAF), representing 41 national associations, also rejected the proposal during meetings on Thursday. By Friday, the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), which includes 47 member associations, publicly aligned itself with UEFA and CONCACAF. Collectively, these three confederations represent 143 of FIFA’s 211 member associations, comfortably exceeding the majority required to block the proposal. The backlash highlighted growing frustration over FIFA’s decision-making processes. On Saturday, AFC President Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al Khalifa welcomed FIFA’s decision to abandon the plan but emphasized that any proposal capable of reshaping world football must involve broader consultation. He stated that initiatives with significant consequences should be presented to confederations, the FIFA Council, member associations, and other stakeholders in a “timely, transparent, and meaningful manner.” "The future of global football must always be shaped through proper consultation, collective dialogue, and respect for the established governance structures of our game," Sheikh Salman said. Football Australia chairman Anter Isaac echoed these concerns, noting that innovation should never come at the expense of football’s governing principles. "Football has never stood still, nor should it," Isaac said. "Some principles, however, should never change. Integrity. Independence. Good governance." The controversy surrounding the proposed deal underscored deep divisions within the global football community. While FIFA aimed to secure additional funding for the development of football in underrepresented regions, the method of achieving this goal, through the sale of commercial rights, was met with strong resistance from key stakeholders. The decision to scrap the plan reflects the influence of regional confederations and highlights the challenges faced by FIFA in maintaining unity among its diverse membership base.
5 izvještaja
Der StandardNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 94Objektivnost 88prije 4 danaMeđunarodna nogometna federacija (FIFA) objavila je planove za prodaju komercijalnih prava na svoje turnire investitorima, s ciljem prikupljanja više od četiri milijarde dolara.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljene i FIFA-ina objava i UEFA-ina kritika bez da se otvoreno favorizira bilo koja strana.
Zašto činjenice (94): The article accurately reports the FIFA plan to sell partial commercial rights to investors for over four billion dollars, mentions the creation of a new entity called FFE valued at 20 billion dollars, and includes direct quotes from the UEFA criticizing the move. The details align closely with the
Zašto objektivnost (88): The article presents the information neutrally, quoting both FIFA and the UEFA. It avoids overtly biased language but does frame the FIFA initiative as controversial, which may slightly influence perception.
Deutsche Welle (Deutsch)Državni / javniSredinaČinjenice 93Objektivnost 87prije 3 danaEuropska nogometna unija (UEFA) kritikovala je plan, tvrdeći da prelazi granicu komodifikacijom nogometa i da nedostaje transparentnosti u vezi s financijskim pogodnostima. Bivši predsjednik FIFA-e Sepp Blatter također je izrazio snažno odbijanje, napominjući da bi bliski odnos između Infantina i američkog predsjednika Donalda Trumpa mogao financijski naštetiti nogometu. Inicijativa ima za cilj demokratizirati nogomet tako što će svim 211 udruga članicama dati udio u novoj tvrtki, omogućujući im da zadrže ili prodaju svoje dionice.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni FIFA-in prijedlog i kritike UEFA-e i bivših vođa poput Seppa Blattera, bez da se otvoreno favorizira jedna strana.
Zašto činjenice (93): The article accurately describes the FIFA proposal to sell part of the commercial rights to investors, mentions the value of the deal, and includes statements from the UEFA and former FIFA president Sepp Blatter. It aligns with the other articles and provides additional context about the relationshi
Zašto objektivnost (87): The article remains largely objective but includes a quote from Sepp Blatter that may introduce a subtle bias. The overall tone is neutral, though it emphasizes the controversy surrounding the deal.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Neovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 92Objektivnost 85prije 4 danaFIFA je najavila planove za prodaju djelomičnih komercijalnih prava na svoje nogometne turnire privatnim investitorima, s ciljem stvaranja više od četiri milijarde američkih dolara. To bi uključivalo organizaciju budućih događaja poput turnira Svjetskog prvenstva pod novom podružnicom, FFE, gdje bi FIFA zadržala većinsko vlasništvo. Privatni investitori mogli bi steći manjinske udjele u vrijednosti milijardi, dok bi sva 211 FIFA udruženja dobila manje dionice koje bi mogla držati ili prodati. Europska nogometna unija (UEFA) snažno je kritizirala plan, tvrdeći da je prodaja "duše" nogometa neprimjerena i da financijske koristi ne bi trebale biti pod kontrolom jednog entiteta.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni i FIFA-in prijedlog i UEFA-ina kritika bez da se otvoreno favorizira jedna strana.
Zašto činjenice (92): The article provides accurate details about the proposed sale of commercial rights by FIFA, including the target amount of over four billion dollars and the formation of the FFE. It also references external sources like the 'Times' and 'Financial Times', though some details are speculative.
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but shows a slight bias toward the UEFA’s criticism. It uses phrases like 'Infantino überschreite eine Grenze,' which implies judgment rather than presenting facts objectively.
Siol.netDržavni / javniSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 70prije 3 danaMeđunarodna nogometna asocijacija (FIFA) predložila je prodaju 20% komercijalnih prava na Svjetsko prvenstvo privatnim investitorima, što je izazvalo snažne kritike različitih nogometnih saveza, uključujući UEFA, europsko nogometno upravljačko tijelo na čelu s slovenačkim predsjednikom Aleksanderom Čeferinom. Prijedlog zahtijeva odobrenje izvršnog odbora FIFA-e od 38 članova i većine njegovih 211 članova. UEFA i druge nogometne organizacije izrazile su zabrinutost zbog nedostatka transparentnosti i pravilnih postupaka oko odluke, a neki su predložili drastične mjere poput bojkotiranja Svjetskog prvenstva ako FIFA ne preispita. Bivši predsjednik FIFA-e Sepp Blatter kritikovao je bliski odnos između trenutnog predsjednika FIFA-e Giannija Infantina i američkog predsjednika Donalda Trumpa, navodeći da financijski šteti nogometu. Nekoliko nacionalnih nogometnih saveza, uključujući FA s Engleske, FFF RFs Francuske i RFEF Španjolske, podigalo je sumnje u vezi s prijedbom i dovelo Infantina u pitanje.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljena različita gledišta različitih nogometnih saveza, dužnosnika i kritičara, pružajući uravnoteženu pokrivenost kontroverzi oko FIFA-inog prijedloga.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article provides accurate information about Fifa's plan to sell 20 percent of commercial rights to private investors and mentions Uefa's potential response, including the possibility of a boycott. It references Sky News regarding Uefa considering a boycott of the World Cup. However, it lacks spe
Zašto objektivnost (70): The article uses strong language such as 'war' and 'sell-off' and suggests Uefa might consider a boycott, which may reflect a biased perspective. The mention of 'virtual meeting' and 'skrajnem ukrepu' implies a clear stance against Fifa's proposal, potentially influencing the reader's perception.
Daily SabahStranački povezanSredinaprije 13 hFIFA je odbacila svoj plan prodaje 20% udjela u komercijalnim pravima na Svjetsko prvenstvo za do 4,2 milijarde dolara nakon što se suočila sa snažnim protivljenjem regionalnih nogometnih konfederacija. Prijedlog, koji je objavljen samo četiri dana ranije, imao je za cilj financiranje globalnog nogometnog razvoja, ali je izazvao široke kritike zbog nedostatka savjetovanja i zabrinutosti zbog privatizacije jedne od najvrednijih sportskih sredstava. Nakon intenzivnog protivrešenja, predsjednik FIFA-e Gianni Infantino priznao je da je inicijativa prouzročila nepotrebnu podjelu i odlučio je napustiti. Velike konfederacije poput UEFA-e, CONCACAF-a i AFC-a ujedinile su se protiv plana, a UEFA prijeti bojkotom FIFA natjecanja ako se prijedlog nastavi.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak objektivno prikazuje situaciju, citirajući stav FIFA-e i kritike regionalnih konfederacija, bez da otvoreno favorizira bilo koju stranu.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
