The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Malacañang Palace have publicly endorsed the National Bureau of Investigation's (NBI) decision to restart an inquiry into alleged financial irregularities surrounding the Philippines' hosting of the 2019 Southeast Asian (SEA) Games. This move comes amid heightened scrutiny and controversy over the allocation of public funds for infrastructure projects in New Clark City, Tarlac, which hosted the event. The DOJ emphasized that the NBI operates independently and that its actions are based on legal mandates rather than political motivations or the ongoing impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. The NBI, led by Director Melvin Matibag, announced that it had received new information suggesting that approximately P10 billion in government funds allocated for SEA Games-related projects had not been liquidated. This prompted the bureau to revisit the case, focusing on potential issues such as the absence of competitive bidding processes for certain infrastructure projects and the contentious P50 million cauldron used during the opening ceremonies. The investigation aims to uncover discrepancies in the expenditure of public resources and ensure compliance with procurement laws. The Palace reiterated that the NBI and the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group of the Philippine National Police are authorized to conduct such investigations independently, without requiring presidential directives. Press officer Claire Castro dismissed allegations that the timing of the investigation was politically motivated, stating that the NBI acted upon its own initiative after receiving credible information about possible irregularities. She also warned Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, who chairs the Philippine Southeast Asian Games Organizing Committee (Phisgoc), not to react impulsively to the probe, implying that such behavior might suggest guilt. Meanwhile, Senator Panfilo "Ping" Lacson has raised concerns about alleged "ghost" flood control projects in Taguig City, which falls under Cayetano's jurisdiction. Lacson claimed that these projects were linked to companies associated with the Discayas family during Cayetano's tenure as House Speaker. Former congressman Lino Cayetano, brother of Senators Alan and Pia Cayetano, has offered to provide information on these alleged projects, prompting Lacson to assert that he would pursue the investigation thoroughly without fabricating evidence. Cayetano has denied the existence of ghost projects in Taguig, citing the Office of the Ombudsman's assertion in 2025 that no such projects existed. He challenged Lacson to investigate other highly urbanized cities like Quezon City, Mandaluyong, Makati, and Parañaque, arguing that targeting Taguig was politically motivated. Cayetano also addressed Lacson's claims regarding the doubling of his and Senator Erwin Tulfo's net worth, clarifying that he merely used their net worth as an example in a discussion about the impeachment court's consideration of subpoenaing Vice President Duterte's financial records. Public Works Secretary Vince Dizon faced calls from Cayetano to resist external pressures while verifying allegations about the flood control projects in Taguig. Dizon had previously stated that no ghost projects were found in the city, though he committed to conducting further verification. The situation has escalated tensions between Cayetano and Lacson, with the latter asserting that Cayetano belongs in jail for alleged corruption and accusing him of making substantial budget insertions under the 2025 national budget. As the investigation unfolds, the focus remains on ensuring transparency and accountability in public spending, particularly concerning major infrastructure projects. The NBI's probe into both the SEA Games and Taguig's flood control initiatives highlights the broader context of financial oversight and the challenges faced by investigative bodies in navigating complex political landscapes. The outcomes of these inquiries could significantly impact the credibility of public officials and the integrity of governmental operations.
7 izvještaja
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 80prije 15 hNacionalni istražni ured (NBI) istražuje navodne projekte kontrole poplava u Taguig Cityju, koji je pod utjecajem senatora Alana Petera Cayetana. To je uslijedilo nakon tvrdnji senatora Panfila Laxona da su ovi projekti uključivali prijevare.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se istraga prikazuje kao politički potez usmjeren protiv Cayetana, naglašavajući njegovo poricanje i kritiku NBI-jevog fokusa.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article provides accurate reporting on the NBI's investigation into the 'ghost' projects in Taguig, citing NBI Director Melvin Matibag's comments. It references previous statements by Cayetano and connects the investigation to the ongoing impeachment trial, maintaining consistency with other sou
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article remains relatively neutral, presenting both sides of the debate without overtly taking a stance. It reports on the NBI's actions and Cayetano's criticisms without injecting strong emotional language, though there is some tension in the narrative.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 89Objektivnost 75jučer Lacson kaže Cayetano pripada u QC zatvor za navodnu korupcijuSenator Panfilo Lacson odgovorio je na tvrdnje senatora Alana Petera Cayetana da se njegova neto vrijednost više nego udvostručila, negirajući optužbe i tvrdeći da njegovo bogatstvo dolazi iz legitimnih nekretnina i poslovnih poduhvata.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): Članak predstavlja optužbe senatora Laxona protiv senatora Cayetana koristeći snažan jezik kao što je "pripada u Quezon City zatvor" i naglašava Lacsonovu obranu svog integriteta dok izdaje specifične optužbe protiv Cayetana.
Zašto činjenice (89): The article accurately reports Cayetano's denial of ghost projects in Taguig, including his challenge to Lacson to investigate other cities. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that Cayetano maintains the projects are legitimate and that Lacson is singling him out. The factual claims are suppo
Zašto objektivnost (75): While the article is mostly neutral, it presents Cayetano's challenge to Lacson in a way that highlights the personal feud, which slightly reduces objectivity. The tone is more confrontational than purely informative.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 88Objektivnost 75prije 3 dana Ministarstvo pravosuđa i Palača podržavaju plan NBI-ja da se riješi problem održavanja SEA igaraMinistarstvo pravosuđa (DOJ) i filipinsko predsjedništvo javno su podržali odluku Nacionalnog istražnog biroa (NBI) o ponovnom otvaranju istrage o navodnim nepravilnostima povezanim s igrama u jugoistočnoj Aziji (SEA) 2019. godine.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni stavovi više zainteresiranih strana - Ministarstva pravosuđa, Palate i Senatora - bez da se otvoreno favorizira bilo koja strana.
Zašto činjenice (88): The article accurately reports on the DOJ and Palace's support for the NBI's investigation into the SEA Games hosting issues, referencing the DOJ's statement and the legal basis for the probe. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the investigation is based on evidence rather than political
Zašto objektivnost (75): There is a slight leaning towards supporting the DOJ and Palace's position, though it does not overtly take sides. The language is generally objective, though there is some subtle framing that implies the investigation is politically motivated.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 87Objektivnost 70prije 12 h Lino Cayetano može svjedočiti o Taguigu gh Ghost projects LacsonSenator Panfilo Lacson najavio je da bi bivši kongresmen iz Taguig Lino Cayetano, koji je sada generalni direktor PTV4, mogao svjedočiti o navodnim "projektima duhova" u Taguig Cityju.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se prikazuju obje strane situacije bez da se otvoreno favorizira jedna perspektiva.
Zašto činjenice (87): The article accurately reports on Lacson's claim that Cayetano belongs in jail for corruption, including his reference to the SALN net worth figures. It presents the exchange between the senators and aligns with the cross-source consensus that both are accusing each other of wrongdoing. The factual
Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone is charged, particularly in Lacson's accusations and Cayetano's rebuttal. The article frames the conflict as a personal attack, introducing a biased perspective that emphasizes the adversarial relationship between the senators.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 86Objektivnost 72prije 20 h Lacson za Cayetano: Ti pripadaš zatvoruSenator Panfilo Lacson optužio je senatora Alana Petera Cayetana za korupciju i sugerirao da pripada u zatvoru, odgovarajući na Cayetanoove optužbe protiv njega. Lacson je tvrdio da je njegovo bogatstvo znatno poraslo od ostavke na dužnosti, pripisujući ga legitimnim investicijama u nekretnine i poslovnim poduhvatima.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): Članak predstavlja izravnu razmjenu između dva senatora, a Lacson koristi snažnu retoriku koja sugerira da Cayetano pripada u zatvoru, što situaciju prikazuje kao osobni napad umjesto uravnotežene rasprave o politici ili upravljanju.
Zašto činjenice (86): The article accurately reports on Lacson's counterclaim to Cayetano's allegations about his net worth, including the specific figures and his assertion that the increase is due to legitimate business activities. It maintains alignment with the cross-source consensus on the nature of the dispute and
Zašto objektivnost (72): The article uses emotionally charged language, such as 'belongs in the QC jail,' which introduces a subjective tone. While it reports the facts, the phrasing leans toward sensationalism, reducing objectivity.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 8 h Cayetano kaže Dizonu da se odupre "tlaku" u Taguigovom projektu.Senator Alan Peter Cayetano pozvao je tajnika javnih radova Vincea Dizona da se odupre vanjskom pritisku u vezi s navodima da su neki projekti za kontrolu poplava u Taguig Cityju povezani s Cayetanom bili "projekti duhova". Dizon je izjavio da će naložiti okružnom inženjeru DPWH-a da istraži tvrdnje senatora Panfila "Pinga" Lacsona. Cayetano je tvrdio da je Dizon prethodno potvrdio da u Taguigu nema projekata duhova. Cayetano je pohvalio Dizonovu odlučnost, ali je upitao zašto je Dizon odlučio provjeriti tvrdnju nakon što ju je Lacson podigao.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja obje strane kontroverze: Cayetanoovu obranu projekata kontrole poplava i Dizonovu odluku da istraži.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports Cayetano's urging to Dizon not to yield to pressure regarding the Taguig flood control projects. It includes direct quotes from Cayetano and mentions Dizon's verification process. The article aligns with the cross-source consensus that Cayetano denies ghost projects an
Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat confrontational, especially in Cayetano's remarks where he criticizes Dizon's response to Lacson's allegations. There is a clear adversarial framing between Cayetano and Lacson, which introduces bias.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeovisanSredinajučer Cayetano Lacsonu: Nema projekata duhova u Taguigu, nemojte nas izdvojitiSenator Alan Peter Cayetano negirao je optužbe senatora Panfila Laxona da u Taguig Cityju postoje projekti za kontrolu poplava. Cayetano je tvrdio da su Ured ombudsmana i njegov vlastiti ured pregledali gradske projekte i nisu pronašli takve probleme. Izazvao je Laxona da istraži druge visoko urbanizirane gradove umjesto da izdvoji Taguig, navodeći njihovu tekuću svađu.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Cayetano se brani od optužbi za korupciju i osporava Lacsonov fokus na Taguigu, dok Lacson optužuje Cayetana za financijsko nepošteno ponašanje.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
PH
