ON
← Natrag na feed
Bernard Arnault ismijava istragu Le Mondea: šef LVMH-a objavljuje sarkastičan X-ov odgovor
India🏛️ PolitikaSredinaprije 13 h

Bernard Arnault ismijava istragu Le Mondea: šef LVMH-a objavljuje sarkastičan X-ov odgovor

Bernard Arnault, izvršni direktor LVMH-a, odgovorio je na šestodjelnu istražnu seriju francuskog novina Le Monde koja je ispitivala unutarnje obiteljske napetosti i njegov poslovni utjecaj. Umjesto da izda službeno opovrgavanje, Arnault je objavio sarkastični odgovor na X, ismijavajući opsežno izvještavanje novina i uspoređujući se s "posljednjom kraljevskom obitelji Francuske". Odbacio je tvrdnje o pitanjima nasljeđivanja unutar svoje obitelji, sugerišući da se takve glasine koriste za stvaranje senzacionalističkog novinarstva. Arnault je također zanemario optužbe da je utjecao na francuske i međunarodne vođe, šalivši se o svojim interakcijama s svjetskim ličnostima.

Bernard Arnault, the chairman and CEO of LVMH, the world’s largest luxury goods company, has dismissed claims of internal family discord threatening the future of his business empire, responding to a major investigative series by Le Monde with a sharp, sarcastic critique posted on X. The response came after the French newspaper published a six-part series scrutinizing Arnault’s vast influence in business, politics, and media, as well as the dynamics among his five children, who are potential successors to his leadership. Arnault’s reply, titled “Thank you,” was both self-deprecating and biting. He humorously referred to himself as “the last royal family of France” following reports by Le Monde, which he claimed had spent six months, two journalists, and six installments to investigate his affairs. “I had not been granted such treatment since I took over Boussac in 1984,” he wrote, referencing his earlier career. At that time, he was dubbed “The Terminator.” Now, he preferred the label “the last royal family,” joking that it was “more elegant, and it’s better for sales at Dior.” The Le Monde investigation, published between July 19 and 24, delved into the power structure of LVMH, the political connections of Arnault, and the potential conflicts among his children regarding the company’s future leadership. One installment described the succession question as “the elephant in the room,” while a translation of the original French headline was rendered as “the poison at the heart of LVMH.” The newspaper reportedly spoke with multiple LVMH executives and members of the Arnault family, including Arnault himself, and detailed perceived tensions around the group’s leadership transition. In his response, Arnault ridiculed the notion that his children’s relationships could destabilize LVMH. He stated that he was fully aware of granting the Le Monde series the attention it sought, but added that it might serve a useful purpose: sparing others the effort of speculating about family fractures to sell newspapers. “They’ll be waiting a long time,” he remarked, dismissing the idea that such speculation would yield results anytime soon. Months prior, Arnault had downplayed succession concerns during LVMH’s annual shareholders’ meeting, stating the issue would not become relevant for “another seven or eight years.” In his X post, he also addressed suggestions that he had undue influence over French politicians, joking that he might have stayed on Avenue Montaigne, speaking only to his dog. He also mentioned having “whispered” to several U.S. presidents, British prime ministers, German chancellors, and even the Emperor of Japan. Arnault further mocked the idea that LVMH’s “business-first strategy” constituted an exposé, suggesting that it was hardly surprising for a global luxury brand to prioritize business interests. He listed other corporations, such as L’Oréal, Danone, and Renault, as examples of businesses focused on their core operations. “We can keep this going until Christmas,” he quipped. Regarding allegations of influence over media organizations, Arnault pointed out that Le Monde itself has a shareholder who is also his son-in-law, billionaire Xavier Niel. He questioned the extent of French editorial independence and expressed willingness to pay for a lesson on the subject. He also dismissed claims that his philanthropy was motivated by tax benefits, citing his contributions to projects such as the reconstruction of Notre-Dame, support for a mathematics research institute at Polytechnique, and the Fondation Louis Vuitton. He argued that these actions were simply part of a legal framework encouraging charitable donations. Arnault’s response underscores his confidence in his position and his ability to control the narrative around his personal and corporate life. His comments suggest that he views the Le Monde investigation as an overblown attempt to sensationalize private matters, rather than a legitimate inquiry into the governance of one of the world’s most powerful companies.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

1 izvještaja

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 13 h
Bernard Arnault ismijava istragu Le Mondea: šef LVMH-a objavljuje sarkastičan X-ov odgovor

Bernard Arnault, izvršni direktor LVMH-a, odgovorio je na šestodjelnu istražnu seriju francuskog novina Le Monde koja je ispitivala unutarnje obiteljske napetosti i njegov poslovni utjecaj. Umjesto da izda službeno opovrgavanje, Arnault je objavio sarkastični odgovor na X, ismijavajući opsežno izvještavanje novina i uspoređujući se s "posljednjom kraljevskom obitelji Francuske". Odbacio je tvrdnje o pitanjima nasljeđivanja unutar svoje obitelji, sugerišući da se takve glasine koriste za stvaranje senzacionalističkog novinarstva. Arnault je također zanemario optužbe da je utjecao na francuske i međunarodne vođe, šalivši se o svojim interakcijama s svjetskim ličnostima.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Iako članak raspravlja o Arnaultovoj strategiji odnosa s javnošću i njegovim odgovorima na medijski nadzor, okvir ostaje uravnotežen.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports that Bernard Arnault responded to Le Monde's investigative series with a sarcastic X post. It provides details from the published investigation, including the focus on succession issues and the newspaper's reporting process. The article cites sources like interviews wi

Zašto objektivnost (75): The tone is somewhat critical of Le Monde's investigation, particularly through Arnault's sarcastic remarks. While the article presents both sides (Arnault's response and the newspaper's findings), it leans slightly toward portraying the investigation as an overreach, which introduces a minor bias.

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče