Antikorupcija sankcionira 34 javna službenika; nametne nehabilitacije do 20 godina i kazne od 1,8 mdp

Mexico's anti-corruption authority has imposed sanctions on 34 public officials, including disqualifications lasting up to 20 years and fines exceeding 1.8 million pesos, following investigations into serious misconduct. The Secretariat of Anti-Corruption and Good Governance, along with the Federal Tribunal of Administrative Justice (TFJA), announced the penalties after uncovering violations through internal control bodies across several federal agencies. The TFJA detailed that the actions stemmed from investigations conducted by Internal Control Units within the Federal Educational Authority in Mexico City (AEFCM), the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Sader), the Ministry of Economy (SE), the Federal Consumer Protection Agency (Profeco), the National Customs Agency of Mexico (ANAM), and the Responsibility Unit at the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE). These investigations uncovered evidence of both grave and lesser infractions, leading to disciplinary measures against the officials involved. In the case of AEFCM, José L, a staff member at the Emiliano Zapata Secondary School in Mexico City, received a 20-year ban from public service due to allegations of sexual harassment against two students in 2020. At Sader, María H was disqualified from public service for 15 years and fined 140,000 pesos, while Leticia L faced a 10-year ban and a fine of 58,000 pesos. Irving F and Víctor M each received one-year bans and fines of 26,000 and 3,000 pesos respectively, all related to approving 119 benefits under the Production for Well-being program without proper documentation for beneficiaries in 2019 and 2020. At the Ministry of Economy, María G was banned from holding public positions for 15 years and ordered to pay 1.5 million pesos in compensation for authorizing 10 salary-related leaves without proper authorization in 2022. In Profeco, Araceli D was disqualified from public service for 10 years and received a 79,000 peso fine, alongside her dismissal, for misusing travel allowances meant for public service activities in 2021. At ANAM, Juan C and Manuel R were each given one-year bans for attempting to secure economic benefits from users during merchandise inspections in 2022. Meanwhile, Edgar O, José D, and Oscar M from the Distribution Division of Valley of Mexico South at CFE were each suspended for three months for failing to properly verify a meter in 2021. The Secretariat of Anti-Corruption and Good Governance added that additional sanctions were imposed on public servants across other institutions such as Pemex, CFE, Conalep, the National Guard, the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), the National Forestry Commission (Conafor), Sader, Finabien, Airports and Auxiliary Services (ASA), Banco del Bienestar S.N.C., I.B.D. (BaBien), Banobras, ISSSTE, the Ministry of Economy (SE), and the Mexican Postal Service (Sepomex). These actions reflect ongoing efforts to hold public officials accountable for their conduct, ensuring transparency and integrity in government operations. The scope of the investigations indicates a broad reach across multiple sectors, highlighting the commitment to addressing corruption and misuse of public resources. The enforcement of these penalties underscores the importance placed on maintaining ethical standards among public servants. Each case was reviewed based on specific evidence gathered during the investigations, leading to tailored disciplinary actions aimed at deterring future misconduct. The variety of sanctions, ranging from temporary suspensions to long-term bans and financial penalties, illustrates the severity of the offenses committed. The involvement of numerous federal agencies in these investigations suggests a coordinated approach to combating corruption. This effort includes not only the direct imposition of sanctions but also the reinforcement of internal controls designed to prevent similar incidents. The focus on both administrative and financial repercussions aims to create a deterrent effect, encouraging compliance with established regulations and ethical guidelines. As these cases move forward, further details regarding the exact nature of the infractions and the procedures followed by the investigating bodies will likely emerge. The impact of these sanctions on the affected individuals and the broader implications for public administration remain areas of interest as the process continues.