A hurried HDZ release because of the message circulating on the networks: "Amateur subversion of the radical left!"
The ruling Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has issued a strongly worded statement criticizing what they describe as amateurish disinformation spread by radical left activists online. The HDZ claims these activists are attempting to shift blame onto them for issues related to waste management in Lika, suggesting that the growing awareness among citizens of the radical left’s alleged parasitic behavior is being falsely attributed to HDZ actions. In their post, the HDZ shared screenshots of what they claim are fabricated messages circulating on social media, which allegedly suggest that supporters of protests should be labeled as extremists, Yugoslavs, anti-Croatians, or haters of all things Croatian. The HDZ emphasized that it does not oppose any legal protest and reiterated that the upcoming protest in Lika is scheduled for September 5th. They further argue that the left has faced setbacks with previous protests like 'Rijeka Nepravda' and the Balkan March, and now seeks to deflect attention from its failure to address local issues such as waste management in Gospić by creating false narratives.
Severina called for a protest against the illegal dumping of hazardous waste in Lika, urging citizens to join the demonstration on September 5 in Zagreb. In her message, she emphasized that issues such as death, illness, and corruption affect everyone and have no ideological affiliations. She criticized those opposing the protest, suggesting they were either aligned with criminals who dumped waste in Gospić or with the authorities, or simply ignorant. She urged all citizens, regardless of political stance, to participate, stating that Croatia must be proven through actions, not just words. The call came after Severina performed at a concert in Karlovec, where she encouraged the audience to support the initiative "Hodaj za Liku," organized by the group "Gospić je naš dom." Her message was later posted on Instagram, where she detailed the environmental and health concerns related to the waste issue. She highlighted the lack of accountability from politicians and officials, including ministers who dismissed public concerns about contaminated water. She also referenced historical figures and political leaders, drawing parallels between past struggles for freedom and current efforts to protect Croatia's integrity. In response to the growing attention around the protest, the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) denied being behind a circulated message that allegedly instructed members on how to counter the demonstration. The party described the message as amateurish and claimed it reflected frustration among radical left-wing groups. HDZ stated that while it does not oppose legal protests, it condemned attempts to politicize the issue and accused the left of using the situation for its own gain. They pointed to previous failures of the left, such as the failed "Rijeka nepravde" and "Balkanski marš" protests, as evidence of their inability to address real societal problems. Political analysts, including Žarko Puhovski, noted that the waste scandal has exposed both the government’s responsibility and the shortcomings of opposition parties. He argued that the opposition should focus more on ecological policies rather than attacking the government. Puhovski criticized the lack of leadership within the State Inspectorate and the failure of opposition parties to present meaningful solutions during recent parliamentary sessions. He also highlighted the broader political climate in Croatia, which he attributed to a system that prioritizes personal interests over public welfare. Meanwhile, SDP representative Ivana Marković addressed the issue of national identity, criticizing the notion that anyone, whether HDZ, Thompson, or Štimac, has a monopoly on patriotism. She emphasized that true patriotism involves protecting the country from harmful practices, such as illegal waste dumping, rather than merely shouting slogans. Marković called on citizens to attend the protest, carrying the Croatian flag and expressing their stance against the government’s inaction. She warned that the current political atmosphere, supported by the ruling regime, risks normalizing corruption and criminal behavior under the guise of national pride. As the protest approaches, tensions remain high, with calls for civic engagement and political accountability. The debate over the role of the state in addressing environmental crises continues to divide public opinion, with some advocating for stronger action and others warning against politicization. The upcoming demonstration represents a critical moment in the ongoing struggle to hold power accountable and ensure the protection of Croatia’s natural resources and public health.
Go to the primary sources (9)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article reports that a screenshot of a message allegedly sent within a WhatsApp group of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has circulated on social media. The message appears to instruct members on how to respond to the 'Hodaj za Liku' protest, organized for September 5th in Zagreb against illegal and toxic waste in Gospić. The message suggests attacking groups and individuals associated with the protest using specific labels such as 'extreme leftists,' 'anti-Heretics,' and 'Yugoslavs.' It also encourages continued attacks with different epithets if responses are received. In response, HDZ called the content 'amateurish sabotage' by activists, claiming it reflects growing frustration with radical leftist movements and attempts to misrepresent the protest as being orchestrated by HDZ. The party denied any involvement in organizing the protest and criticized past leftist-led protests as failures.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the alleged instructions as a form of 'amateurish sabotage' by activists, implying that the opposition (leftist groups) are attempting to manipulate public perception through disinformation. The language used by HDZ emphasizes the threat posed by radical leftist movements and the
Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without taking sides. It avoids emotional language and focuses on the content of HDZ's response.
Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 96Objective 852 days ago
The ruling Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has issued a strongly worded statement criticizing what they describe as amateurish disinformation spread by radical left activists online. The HDZ claims these activists are attempting to shift blame onto them for issues related to waste management in Lika, suggesting that the growing awareness among citizens of the radical left’s alleged parasitic behavior is being falsely attributed to HDZ actions. In their post, the HDZ shared screenshots of what they claim are fabricated messages circulating on social media, which allegedly suggest that supporters of protests should be labeled as extremists, Yugoslavs, anti-Croatians, or haters of all things Croatian. The HDZ emphasized that it does not oppose any legal protest and reiterated that the upcoming protest in Lika is scheduled for September 5th. They further argue that the left has faced setbacks with previous protests like 'Rijeka Nepravda' and the Balkan March, and now seeks to deflect attention from its failure to address local issues such as waste management in Gospić by creating false narratives.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the HDZ's perspective using strong language such as 'amateurs,' 'parasitic behavior,' and 'fabricated messages.' It frames the radical left as spreading disinformation and accuses them of shifting blame onto the HDZ while ignoring local issues. The tone is critical of the left,
Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without taking sides. It avoids emotional language and focuses on the content of HDZ's response.
Večernji listIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 802 days ago
The article reports that the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has denied being behind a controversial message circulating online, which urges supporters to attack groups and individuals associated with the radical left during an upcoming protest against waste management issues in Lika. The message, attributed to the HDZ's 'media team,' instructs followers to engage in aggressive rhetoric against 'extreme leftists, anti-Heratians, Yugoslavs, and haters of everything that is Croatian.' HDZ claims this is an attempt by activists to shift blame onto them, arguing that the left wing is increasingly seen as trying to exploit the protest for political gain. The article states that the left has faced setbacks, including failed protests like the Rijeka Nepravda demonstration and the Balkan March, and now seeks to co-opt civil initiatives like the Gospić initiative. HDZ asserts that these fabricated messages aim to distract the public from the true issue, waste management, and highlight the lack of concern for citizens’ well-being.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy around the alleged involvement of HDZ in inciting anti-left rhetoric, portraying the left as irresponsible and politically motivated. It emphasizes the perceived failure of leftist movements and suggests that their attempts to co-opt civil initiatives are disingenu
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message circulating online. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents HDZ's perspective neutrally, avoiding emotional language and providing both sides of the argument. It remains objective in its reporting of the incident.
Political analyst Žarko Puhovski criticized the Croatian opposition for failing to present serious solutions during the waste management scandal in Gospić, which has been known for three years. He argued that while the government bears responsibility, the opposition treated the issue as a political attack rather than an opportunity to improve environmental policies. Puhovski highlighted the lack of local community action and called for more effective measures to clean rivers like the Danube and Drava. He also criticized the absence of a chief state inspector for over nine months and questioned the effectiveness of proposed legal reforms, noting that high penalties alone are insufficient if they are not enforced. Additionally, he expressed skepticism about the upcoming protest on September 5th, suggesting organizers' neutrality might limit its impact.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive issue involving the government and opposition, the framing remains balanced. The critic does not overtly favor one side but highlights shortcomings on both sides, government accountability and opposition failure to act effectively. There is no clear
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents HDZ's perspective neutrally, avoiding emotional language and providing both sides of the argument. It remains objective in its reporting of the incident.
The article reports that Croatia's Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and several ministers will visit Gospić tomorrow to discuss the remediation of illegally dumped waste. The local initiative 'Gospić is Our Home' criticizes the timing of the visit, arguing that the prime minister's arrival four days before a planned protest does not address the issue but rather serves political interests. The group calls for the prime minister to listen to citizens' demands on September 5th, hold concrete meetings, and take decisive actions. The article highlights concerns over illegal waste dumping and the perceived lack of genuine engagement from authorities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the government's visit as politically motivated, emphasizing the criticism of the timing and suggesting that the action is more about political damage control than addressing the environmental issue. The tone leans toward supporting citizen activism and questioning governmental诚意,
An article reports on a planned visit by Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and cabinet ministers to Gospić, where they will meet representatives of local institutions and citizens involved in efforts to address illegal waste accumulation. The piece highlights concerns raised by the initiative 'Gospić je naš dom,' which claims that authorities failed to adequately inform residents about plans for covering waste sites, leading to frustration and protests. The group criticizes the government’s handling of the issue, calling for concrete actions and transparency ahead of an upcoming protest on September 5th.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the government's actions as lacking transparency and responsiveness, emphasizing citizen grievances and criticism of bureaucratic processes. It portrays the initiative as representing the voice of the people against perceived governmental neglect, aligning more with left-leaning关切
The initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' has stated that it will not attend a meeting with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and other officials scheduled for Wednesday in Gospić. The group claims they were informally invited but chose not to respond due to previous experiences of similar scenarios. They reference past instances where political efforts were organized before their protests, such as a meeting held two days prior to a protest on June 27th aimed at addressing political damage. The initiative emphasizes the need for citizens' voices to be heard first before engaging with institutions, expressing concerns over slow responses and lack of transparency. They hope for more serious action and greater openness from authorities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the initiative's frustration with institutional delays and lack of transparency as a legitimate concern, emphasizing the importance of citizen voice and accountability. It highlights perceived political maneuvering by authorities, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of power.
The initiative 'Gospić is our home' has decided not to attend a meeting with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and local authorities in Gospić, which is scheduled for tomorrow. Vjekoslav Bušić, representing the initiative, stated they received an unofficial invitation but chose to reject it, citing similar scenarios in the past aimed at repairing political damage. He recalled a previous meeting held two days before the release of research results on the Gospić landfill, which he claims was intended to mitigate political harm. The initiative emphasizes that all actions taken so far have been too slow and insufficient, expressing hope for more serious and transparent efforts moving forward. They remain committed to participating in discussions after the protest on September 5th in Zagreb, provided that concrete demands and deadlines are clearly communicated.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the stance of the 'Gospić is our home' initiative against attending a meeting with the prime minister, highlighting their concerns about political maneuvering and lack of transparency. However, it does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing. It includes direct
The article discusses a growing civil protest against illegal and hazardous waste dumping in Gospić, Croatia, which has been occurring for decades. The waste, primarily toxic, has been illegally transported into the area and dumped in nature reserves, raising concerns over environmental contamination of land and water. The protest, organized by the citizens' initiative 'Gospić je naš dom,' is gaining support daily. Four political analysts agree that this issue could be more significant than previous scandals involving the ruling HDZ party. They highlight the symbolic weight of environmental protection in Croatia and warn that if this becomes part of a broader pattern, it could lead to serious consequences for the ruling party. Analysts suggest that the ruling party may attempt to deflect blame and divide responsibility, but they acknowledge the potential for increased public pressure and mobilization against them.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the waste scandal as a significant threat to the ruling party, emphasizing the potential for widespread public mobilization and environmental symbolism. It highlights the role of citizen initiatives and criticizes the ruling party's attempts to deflect blame, suggesting a leftward
The civic initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' has declined an informal invitation to meet with Prime Minister Plenković and ministers, citing past experiences of similar scenarios. Vjekoslav Bušić, representing the initiative, stated they have already witnessed such situations before, including a meeting in June where findings about illegal waste were announced just two days later. He criticized the lack of transparency and speed in addressing the issue, emphasizing the importance of giving citizens' voices more weight. Bušić expressed hope that after a planned protest on September 5th, there would be more concrete actions and greater transparency from institutions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the civic initiative's concerns as legitimate and highlights criticism of institutional delays and opacity. The emphasis on citizen voice and demands for transparency aligns with progressive values. While the article remains neutral in tone, the focus on institutional shortcomings
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković is set to visit Gospić tomorrow, where he will meet with local authorities and representatives of civil initiatives. However, members of the initiative 'Gospić je naš dom,' including Vjekoslav Bušić, have decided not to attend the meeting. They argue that similar meetings were organized before previous protests against the waste disposal site, which they view as attempts to mitigate political damage. Bušić emphasized that the citizens' voice needs to be heard first, especially ahead of the planned protest on September 5th, after which discussions about specific demands and tasks for the government can take place. He criticized past actions as too slow and expressed hope for more serious future handling of the issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the refusal to engage with the Prime Minister as a principled stand by civil activists, emphasizing grassroots concerns over political maneuvering. The tone supports the protesters' perspective, portraying their actions as justified resistance to perceived political interference,
The article discusses a protest in Zagreb against illegal waste dumping, organized by the initiative 'Gospić is our home.' Protesters argue that such issues are not limited to Gospić but affect many locations across Croatia. The movement has sparked debate online, where some users claim that supporters of the protests are labeled as extremists, anti-Heretics, and Yugoslavs. The HDZ party has denied these claims, calling them amateurish attempts to discredit the protest. Meanwhile, prominent figures like former football player Igor Štimac have labeled protesters as anti-Heretic, while others like Severina have called for unity and participation in the demonstration. The article highlights the polarized reactions to the protest, with some fearing ideological manipulation and others emphasizing the need for collective action.
Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive issue involving accusations of ideological labeling, it presents multiple perspectives without clear editorial bias. It includes voices from both the HDZ party and activists, as well as public opinion, suggesting a balanced approach rather than a slan
The article discusses an environmental crisis in Gospić, Croatia, where hazardous waste was illegally dumped into rocky terrain, sparking widespread public outrage and protests. The local initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' highlights systemic failures in waste management and regulatory oversight, accusing both local authorities and national institutions of negligence. Protest organizers emphasize that the issue transcends local concerns, calling attention to broader ecological problems across Croatia. They criticize the government for failing to act preventively despite early warnings since 2023 and serious risks identified in 2024. The protest aims to demand accountability and action rather than being framed as politically motivated.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the environmental disaster as a result of systemic governmental failure and calls for accountability from national institutions, including the Ministry of Environmental Protection. It criticizes the system for protecting itself and emphasizes the need for urgent action, which is a
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković stated he would not attend the Saturday protest 'Walk for Lika, Walk for Croatia' in Zagreb because he would be attending a conference in Italy. He emphasized that his government focuses on solving problems rather than protesting. The protest, organized by citizens around the Civic Initiative 'Gospic is Our Home,' aims to highlight issues related to tens of thousands of tons of illegally dumped waste in the Gospic area. Plenković confirmed that legal proceedings have been initiated against those responsible, involving 14 physical and four legal entities. He also mentioned that water quality tests conducted by the Croatian Institute of Public Health show that drinking water in Gospic and the entire Licko-Senjska county is safe for consumption. Additionally, he announced changes to the legal framework to strengthen penalties for environmental crimes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Prime Minister Plenković's statements neutrally, focusing on his explanation for not attending the protest and his government's actions regarding the illegal waste issue. There is no evident bias in the framing, word choice, or emphasis. The content provides balanced information
Dalija Orešković, hrvatska saborska zastupnica, navela je da je najavljeni prosvjed za Gospić najvažniji politički događaj od dobivanja samostalnosti Hrvatske. Prosvjed, koji će se održati 5. rujna u Zagrebu, označen je kao 'antihadezeovski', što ukazuje na njegovu ciljanost prema političkoj strukturi koja, prema njoj, uzrokuje problem ilegala odlaganja otpada. Orešković ističe da je Hrvatska postala odlagalište europskog otpada bez razvoja infrastrukture za komunalni otpad, a da je vlast znala o tome godinama. Ona također upozorava na potencijalnu opasnost od 'otova' – smatra da je otpad zakopan u Gospiću, ali i u vladi i ministarstvima. Izrazila je bojazan za nastavak službene istrage i ulogu glavnog državnog odvjetnika.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a nationalistic and anti-establishment movement, emphasizing its importance as a democratic struggle against corruption and environmental degradation. The language used by Orešković suggests a strong critique of the current political system and a call for collective
Dalija Orešković, saborska zastupnica i predsjednica stranke DOSIP, komentirala je prosvjed protiv opasnog otpada u Gospiću u emisiji televizije N1. Ona je naglasila da je prosvjed važan politički događaj i da se radi o anti-HDZ-ovskom pokretu, bez obzira na lijevi ili desni položaj sudionika. Orešković je upozorila da je problem ilegalnih odlagališta široko rasprostranjen diljem Hrvatske, navodeći podatke o više od tri i pol milijuna tona otpada unesenog u Hrvatsku iz inozemstva od 2016. do 2019., većinom nelegalnog. Uz to, ona je izrazila sumnju u objavljene nalaze i kritizirala premijera Andreja Plenkovića za pokušaj dedramatiziranja problema.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest against illegal waste dumps as an 'anti-HDZ' movement, positions Orešković as critical of the ruling HDZ party, and emphasizes environmental issues as a political struggle rather than a technical or administrative issue. The language used suggests a clear ideological立场
Miro Bulj, the mayor of Sinj and member of parliament, discussed his actions as mayor regarding a protest in Zagreb related to Gospić, as well as his views on the nature of such protests, which have recently been criticized by right-wing circles. The interview took place on 'Novi Dani' with Nina Kljenak. The article highlights the political discourse around the protest and Bulj's perspective on it.
Bias read (Progressive): The article discusses a protest and its criticism from right-wing groups, with Miro Bulj defending the protest as 'all-Croatian, sovereign, and patriotic.' This framing aligns with left-leaning rhetoric emphasizing national sovereignty and patriotism, while the critique from right-wing circles is a
The article features a conversation between journalist Nine Kljenak and MP Dalija Orešković discussing the illegal delay of waste disposal in Gospić and the planned protest as a result. The discussion highlights concerns over environmental issues and local governance. The article includes calls for reader engagement through comments and social media follow-ups, but does not provide detailed information on the specifics of the protest or broader implications.
Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on a political figure (MP Dalija Orešković) addressing an issue related to local governance and environmental policies. While the content itself is factual, the emphasis on the protest as 'antihadezeovski' (anti-Hadžić) suggests alignment with opposition views against certain pro
The article discusses a grassroots protest movement in Gospić, Croatia, which began 35 years ago during the siege of the town. It highlights the ongoing efforts of residents to protect their community and calls for support through a 'walk for Lika' event on September 5th. The protest aims to pressure authorities to remove hazardous waste from local areas, citing environmental risks. Commentators on the article express skepticism, suggesting the protest is driven by self-interest, possibly involving external lobbying groups seeking financial gain from waste disposal. Some comments accuse the organizers of misinformation and manipulation.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a legitimate and necessary civic action aimed at protecting the environment and public health. It emphasizes the historical significance of the struggle and portrays the protesters as defenders of national identity and sovereignty. While some commenters suggest the
A fake message attributed to the HDZ (Croatian conservative party) has been circulating online, instructing supporters on how to respond to an upcoming protest in Gospić related to waste management. The message urges participants to attack 'extreme leftists,' 'anti-Heretics,' and others who oppose Croatian national interests. The HDZ has denied responsibility, calling the message 'amateurish sabotage' and accusing the left of trying to co-opt the protest for their own political gain. They argue that the left failed previous protests and now seeks to undermine the current initiative by falsely associating it with HDZ. The protest, titled 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku,' is scheduled for September 5th in Zagreb.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the protest as a legitimate civic initiative being undermined by the left, which the HDZ accuses of attempting to co-opt it for political purposes. The language used to describe the left ('extreme leftists,' 'parasitic workers') carries a negative tone, aligning with right-wing or
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
