Serbian diplomat declared persona non grata by the Foreign Minister of BiH for glorifying Mladic
The Foreign Minister of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Elmedin Konaković, has declared two Serbian diplomats as 'persona non grata' following allegations of glorifying the late war criminal Ratko Mladić. The diplomats, military attache Milan Dulanović and advisor Danka Maksimović of Serbia’s Security Intelligence Agency BIA, are ordered to leave the country within 48 hours. Their diplomatic passports will be revoked, and the diplomatic corps will be instructed not to cooperate further with them. This decision follows the funeral of Mladić, which was held in Belgrade with military honors, prompting Bosnia to downgrade diplomatic relations with Serbia and withdraw all staff except the ambassador and consul. The move aligns with regulations allowing the presidency to expel ambassadors and the foreign ministry to declare other personnel as undesirable. Bosnia has also withdrawn its consent for a joint statement on good neighborly relations and regional cooperation planned for October 1st in Montenegro. European Union representatives expressed deep disappointment over Serbia's participation in Mladić's funeral, calling it contrary to European values, though they have not yet specified concrete
Beograd today came to a standstill as crowds gathered to bid farewell to Ratko Mladić, the former commander of the Army of Republika Srpska who died at the age of 85 in The Hague on August 27, 2026. Mladić, who had been serving a life sentence for war crimes and genocide, including the Srebrenica massacre, was laid to rest in Belgrade after his body was flown back from the Netherlands. His coffin, adorned with a cap, sword, and military decorations, was displayed at the Church of Saint Luke on Košutnjak starting at 7 a.m., drawing large crowds from the early hours. The streets around the church were packed, with many arriving from different parts of Serbia and the Republic of Serbia. Mladić's son, Darko, along with other family members, led the initial tributes before the coffin was handed over to veterans and other visitors. Among those present were Serbian politicians and public figures, including actor Slobodan Ćustić, dressed in black. Darko urged attendees to honor Mladić respectfully and avoid provocations, urging them to use public transport due to anticipated traffic congestion. The funeral service will be conducted by Patriarch Porfirije of the Serbian Orthodox Church at noon, followed by a procession to the Topčider Cemetery, where Mladić will be buried alongside his daughter Ana, as per the family’s wishes. The funeral has drawn significant attention, with police maintaining order and managing the flow of thousands of mourners. Prominent political figures, including representatives from the Democratic Party of Montenegro, have attended. President of Free Montenegro Vladislav Dajković expressed solidarity with the peaceful gathering, noting that the event reflects a "morning of calm and raised heads." Motorcyclists from the Russian motorcycle club "Nočni volkovi" also arrived in large numbers, adding to the atmosphere. Mladić's death sparked controversy, particularly among European officials. Slovenian Commissioner for enlargement Marta Kos criticized the glorification of Mladić, stating it contradicts European values. She announced she would not visit Serbia this week, citing the need for honest reckoning with the past. The European Commission’s High Representative for Human Rights, Michael O’Flaherty, also condemned the public glorification of a war criminal, emphasizing the importance of protecting victims’ rights. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the government responded by designating two Serbian diplomats as undesirable persons, demanding their departure within 48 hours. Foreign Minister Elmedin Konaković stated that diplomatic passports issued to these individuals would be invalidated, and the diplomatic corps would be instructed not to cooperate further. This move follows a broader effort to reduce ties with Serbia, which has been accused of failing to adequately address its wartime legacy. Meanwhile, the European Union has expressed concern over the glorification of Mladić. President Ursula von der Leyen and President Antonio Costa of the European Council described the scenes from the funeral as shocking, highlighting Mladić’s role in the Srebrenica genocide and other atrocities. They emphasized that such actions contradict the values upon which Serbia’s path toward EU membership rests. The European External Action Service reiterated that the glorification of war criminals is unacceptable and has no place in the EU or candidate countries. The funeral, marked by both reverence and controversy, underscores the complex relationship between Serbia and its neighbors, especially in light of ongoing efforts to reconcile with the region’s painful history. As the funeral proceedings continue, the international community watches closely, aware of the implications for regional stability and Serbia’s future.
Go to the primary sources (5)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa expressed strong disapproval of the participation of Serbian officials at the funeral of former war criminal Ratko Mladić in Belgrade. They criticized the footage from the event as disturbing and emphasized that Serbia's actions contradict the values upon which its path toward EU membership is based. Both leaders condemned the official support and presence of high-ranking Serbian representatives at the funeral, suggesting that this reflects Serbia's lack of readiness to confront its dark past and aligns with its commitment to EU principles.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Serbian officials' attendance at Mladić's funeral as a violation of EU values and a sign of Serbia's failure to address its wartime history. The language used by von der Leyen and Costa carries a moral judgment against Serbia's actions, implying that such behavior is contrary,
Why factuality (100): The article accurately reflects the statements made by Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa regarding the funeral of Ratko Mladić. It directly quotes their comments and aligns them with the primary source document, including the condemnation of glorifying war criminals and the reference to Mladić'
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains an objective tone, quoting officials without editorializing. It avoids taking sides and focuses on the reactions of EU leaders, making it highly balanced in its presentation.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa expressed disappointment over the participation of Serbian authorities at the funeral of war criminal Ratko Mladić, calling it a failure to confront dark chapters of European history. They emphasized that Mladić, who was convicted for genocide and crimes against humanity, should not have been honored. Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković criticized the EU's muted response to the funeral, urging high-level leaders like von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas to take stronger action. The EU's spokesperson clarified that the funeral did not include state honors, contradicting initial reports. This incident highlights ongoing tensions between Serbia and the EU over historical accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the EU's criticism of Serbia's handling of Mladić's funeral as a moral stance against honoring war criminals, aligning with progressive values. It emphasizes the EU's condemnation of Serbia's actions, which reflects a left-leaning perspective on historical justice and human rights
Why factuality (100): This article accurately conveys the reactions of Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa to the funeral of Ratko Mladić. It includes direct quotes and aligns with the primary source document, emphasizing the condemnation of glorifying war criminals and referencing Mladić's conviction for genocide and
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral in tone, focusing on the official responses without injecting personal bias or opinion. It provides a balanced view of the situation without favoring any particular side.
The Slovenian Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs condemned the glorification of war criminal Ratko Mladić during his funeral, which took place in Belgrade. Mladić, a former commander of the Serbian Republic who was convicted of genocide and crimes against humanity in 2017, was buried with military honors despite international criticism. The funeral attracted thousands, including members of Serbia’s government and veterans, while some critics, including the European Union and the Council of Europe, called the event unlawful and offensive to victims. The Slovenian ministry emphasized that honoring war criminals contradicts European values and urged authorities to uphold legal responsibilities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the condemnation of Mladić's glorification as a moral and legal imperative aligned with European values, using strong language such as 'povsem nesprejemljivo' ('completely unacceptable') and referencing international institutions like the EU and Council of Europe. It emphasizes a左
Why factuality (100): The article accurately reports on the reactions of EU officials to the participation of Serbian officials at Mladić's funeral. It aligns with the primary source document by condemning the glorification of war criminals and referencing Mladić's conviction for genocide and crimes against humanity.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the official responses without injecting personal bias or opinion. It provides a balanced view of the situation without favoring any particular side.
In Belgrade today, the funeral of former commander of the Republic of Serbian Krajina, Ratko Mladić, took place. Mladić died at the age of 84 in The Hague, where he was serving a life sentence for war crimes. His body was laid to rest in the Church of Saint Luke on Košutnjak starting at 7 AM, drawing large crowds who wished to express condolences to his family and say goodbye. Long lines formed outside the church, with many people coming from different parts of Serbia and the Republika Srpska. Air footage showed a gathering around the church, while nearby streets were closed due to heavy traffic. Family members, including his son Darko, and former colleagues paid their respects, followed by veterans and other visitors. Notable attendees included Serbian politician Slobodan Ćustić and representatives from various political and civic organizations. Mladić’s remains will be buried alongside his daughter Ana in a family tomb. The funeral service will be led by the Serbian Orthodox Patriarch Porfirije, followed by a procession to the Topčider Cemetery. Mladić had been in poor health before his death, despite repeated requests from his family to continue treatment in Serbia.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of Mladić's funeral, highlighting attendance by political figures and public interest. While Mladić is a controversial figure due to his role in war crimes, the article does not take a partisan stance but rather reports on the event objectively. It includes a平衡
Why factuality (95): The article provides precise details about the funeral arrangements, the location, and the expected attendance. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus and includes relevant background information about Mladić’s death and legal status.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the event as a public mourning occasion without taking sides or using emotive language. It focuses on factual reporting and avoids personal commentary.
The Foreign Minister of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Elmedin Konaković, has declared two Serbian diplomats as 'persona non grata' following allegations of glorifying the late war criminal Ratko Mladić. The diplomats, military attache Milan Dulanović and advisor Danka Maksimović of Serbia’s Security Intelligence Agency BIA, are ordered to leave the country within 48 hours. Their diplomatic passports will be revoked, and the diplomatic corps will be instructed not to cooperate further with them. This decision follows the funeral of Mladić, which was held in Belgrade with military honors, prompting Bosnia to downgrade diplomatic relations with Serbia and withdraw all staff except the ambassador and consul. The move aligns with regulations allowing the presidency to expel ambassadors and the foreign ministry to declare other personnel as undesirable. Bosnia has also withdrawn its consent for a joint statement on good neighborly relations and regional cooperation planned for October 1st in Montenegro. European Union representatives expressed deep disappointment over Serbia's participation in Mladić's funeral, calling it contrary to European values, though they have not yet specified concrete
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the action taken by Bosnia and Herzegovina against Serbian diplomats as a principled stand against glorification of war criminals, aligning with international condemnation of such actions. The emphasis on Serbia's involvement in Mladić's funeral and the alignment with European and
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the actions taken by Bosnia and Herzegovina's foreign minister regarding the declaration of two Serbian diplomats as 'undesirable persons' following Mladić's funeral. It provides specific details such as the names of the diplomats, the 48-hour deadline, and references
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the situation in a clear factual manner but uses emotionally charged terms like 'nezaželeni osebi' ('undesirable persons') and mentions the reduction of diplomatic relations, which could be seen as biased toward the Bosnian perspective. It lacks balance by not providing counterp
Bosna in Hercegovina (BiH) je po pogredu obsojenega vojnega zločinca Ratka Mladića dvema srbskim diplomatam, vojaškemu atašeu Milani Dulanoviću in svetovalcu Bie Danka Maksimoviću, odredila, da morata v 48 urah zapustiti državo. Odlukalo je zunanji minister BiH Elmedin Konaković, ki jih razglasil kot 'nezaželena oseba' zaradi poveličevanja Mladića. Diplomatama so razveljavili diplomatski izkaznici, in diplomatski zbor BiH je opozoril, da ne bo sodeloval z njima več. Konaković je dodatno zmanjšal diplomatske odnose s Srbijo, umaknil vse zaposlene, razen veleposlanika in konzula, in odmikal soglasje k skupni izjavi o dobrososedskih odnosih in regionalnem sodelovanju. Predstavniki EU so izrazili obžalovanje zaradi prisotnosti srbskih oblasti na pogredu Mladića in ocenili, da je to v nasprotju z evropskimi vrednotami.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Bosnia and Herzegovina as a justified response to Serbian involvement in the funeral of a war criminal, emphasizing the violation of European values by Serbia. The language used suggests a strong condemnation of Serbia’s actions, aligning more closely with left-wing
Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the content of item 0, reporting the same facts about the declaration of Serbian diplomats as undesirable and the reduction of diplomatic ties. It includes direct quotes from the foreign minister and explains the legal basis for the decision. Like item 0, it omits some b
Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral in presenting the facts but still emphasizes the negative actions taken by Bosnia and Herzegovina without offering alternative perspectives or contextualizing the broader implications of these diplomatic moves.
The Foreign Minister of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Elmedin Konaković, announced that diplomatic relations with Serbia will be reduced to the lowest level due to the commemoration and glorification of war criminal Ratko Mladić at his funeral in Belgrade. He stated that all staff members except the ambassador and consul will withdraw from the BiH embassy in Belgrade. Konaković explained that he does not have authority over their withdrawal, as ambassadors and consuls are appointed by the Presidency of BiH. The decision follows the funeral of Mladić, where high-ranking Serbian and Republika Srpska representatives attended. Earlier, memorial ceremonies in Belgrade saw some media and state representatives, along with parts of the public, advocate for honoring Mladić’s wartime actions. Konaković called on the EU to address whether it would tolerate such behavior in Serbia, noting that candidate countries not accepted into the Union would face this issue. Meanwhile, U.S. Congress members visited the Srebrenica genocide memorial to reaffirm commitment to historical truth and accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a violation of European values and international law, emphasizing the condemnation of glorifying a war criminal while highlighting the EU's stance against such actions. It underscores the tension between BiH and Serbia over historical narratives, aligning morewith
Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the decision by Bosnia and Herzegovina's foreign minister to reduce diplomatic relations with Serbia due to the commemoration of Ratko Mladić. It includes relevant details about the withdrawal of staff from the embassy in Belgrade and references the legal framework
Why objectivity (75): While the article presents the facts clearly, it leans slightly towards the Bosnian perspective by highlighting the reduction of diplomatic ties without providing a broader context or counterpoint from Serbia.
The article reports on comments made by Slovenian Commissioner Marta Kosi regarding the funeral honors granted to Ratko Mladić, a former Bosnian Serb military commander convicted of war crimes and genocide. Kosi criticized the posthumous glorification of Mladić, stating it contradicts European values and the principles necessary for Serbia’s path toward EU membership. She emphasized the need for confronting the past, truth-seeking, and respecting victims of wartime atrocities. Kosi decided not to visit Serbia next week as planned. Mladić died at 85 in The Hague prison after serving a life sentence for his crimes. Serbian Minister of Justice Nenad Vujić suggested Mladić could be buried with state honors in Serbia, but President Aleksandar Vučić rejected this idea. Meanwhile, Mladić’s son Darko confirmed plans to bury him in Belgrade with his daughter Ana.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of European values and Slovenia’s stance on human rights, emphasizing condemnation of Mladić’s glorification. It highlights Slovenia’s position against honoring war criminals, aligning with broader Western European norms. The emphasis on 'European values
Why factuality (94): The article accurately reports the death of Ratko Mladić, his conviction for war crimes and genocide, and the planned return of his remains to Serbia. It cites statements from Marta Kos and mentions the reactions of Serbian officials like Nenad Vujić and Aleksandar Vučić. The details align with cros
Why objectivity (87): The article presents the information in a generally neutral manner, focusing on the facts and quoting officials directly. However, it includes some evaluative language such as 'poveličevanje, ki spremlja njegovo smrt, ni v skladu z vrednotami' which reflects a value judgment rather than pure reporti
The funeral of Ratko Mladić, a former general of the Army of the Republic of Serbia and convicted war criminal, is taking place today in Belgrade. Mladić died on August 27 in The Hague. His remains will be displayed in the Church of Saint Luke the Apostle on Košutnjak between 7 AM and 12 PM, followed by a funeral ceremony. Afterward, a procession with his coffin will proceed to the Topčider Cemetery, where he will be buried next to his daughter Ana around 1:30 PM. Patriarch Porfirije of the Serbian Orthodox Church is expected to lead the funeral according to unofficial reports from some Serbian media. A sacred memorial service is currently being held at the church led by Proto-Priest Đorđe Stojisavljević, head of the Patriarch’s Office. Supporters and veterans have gathered outside the church, with some viewing Mladić as a military hero despite his conviction for war crimes. The exact details of the funeral remain unclear, but organizers stated that Mladić would be buried with military honors and highest honors. However, Euronews reported that the funeral will not include state or military honors, and current government officials such as Prime Minister Đuro Macut and President of议会
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, those who view Mladić as a war hero and those who condemn him as a war criminal, without overtly favoring one side. It includes quotes from supporters and victims' families, as well as conflicting information about whether military honors will be included in the
Why factuality (90): This article accurately reports the timeline, location, and participants of the funeral including the involvement of Patriarch Porfirije and the military honors. The information matches the cross-source consensus and includes quotes from witnesses and officials.
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents facts objectively, it includes a quote from a witness calling the funeral a 'fašistično zborovanje' (fascist gathering), which introduces a subjective viewpoint. However, this is presented as a direct statement rather than an editorial opinion.
The article reports on the funeral of Ratko Mladić, a former commander of the Army of the Republic of Serbian Krajina who was convicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for war crimes, including genocide in Srebrenica and the siege of Sarajevo. Thousands gathered in Belgrade, with members of the Serbian military present at his grave site. Mladić's remains were transported from The Hague to Serbia, where they were handed over to his family. The United Nations and the European Union have condemned the glorification of individuals legally convicted of war crimes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the event without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It includes quotes from official sources such as Reuters and mentions international reactions, providing balanced coverage of the event.
Why factuality (90): The article provides comprehensive background on Mladić’s crimes and legal proceedings, along with logistical details about the transport of his remains. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and includes statements from international bodies regarding the inappropriateness of honoring war crimin
Why objectivity (70): The article includes a direct quote from the UN and EU expressing concern over the glorification of war criminals, which adds a critical perspective. However, it otherwise maintains a factual and objective tone.
The European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the President of the European Council Antonio Costa expressed regret over the participation of Serbian officials at the funeral of war criminal Ratko Mladić, calling it a failure to confront dark chapters of recent European history and inconsistent with Serbia's path toward EU membership. The funeral took place in Belgrade with military honors, attended by several high-ranking Serbian officials. Croatia's Prime Minister Andrej Plenković criticized the EU for responding only through a press representative rather than directly addressing the issue. The European External Action Service stated there is no room for glorifying war criminals within the EU or candidate countries. Earlier, EU Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos had canceled her planned visit to Belgrade due to the glorification of Mladić upon his death.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the official positions of EU leaders and mentions criticism from Croatian officials but does not exhibit clear bias in framing or sourcing. It reports on the event neutrally, highlighting both the EU's disapproval and the presence of Serbian officials at the funeral without slan
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Mladić was a convicted war criminal responsible for genocide and crimes against humanity, aligning closely with the primary source document. It also mentions the EU's criticism of Serbian officials attending his funeral, which is not explicitly stated in the prima
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a generally neutral tone by reporting the statements of EU officials and referencing Croatian Prime Minister Plenković's criticism. However, phrases like 'pretresljivi' ('shocking') and repeated emphasis on the 'dark chapter of European history' may introduce some emotional lan
Evropska komisarka za širitev Marta Kos je v svojih izpovedih ob robu Blejskega strateškega foruma poudarila, da v Evropski uniji in državah, ki želijo postati njeni članice, ni prostora za poveličevanje vojnih zločincev. Njene izjave so bile usmerjene v srbske oblasti, ki so po smrti nekdanjega generala Ratka Mladića razvili posebne obredne prakse, vključno z možnostjo pokopa z najvišjimi državnimi častmi. Kos je poudarila, da je Mladić pravnomočno obsojen za genocid in hudodelstva ter da bo ta dejstvo osnova za oceno situacije v Srbiji. Poleg tega je Komisarka opozorila, da je Bruselj ponovno predlog odprtje sklopa poglavij o gospodarski konkurenčnosti v okviru pristopnih pogajanj z Beogradom, kljub temu pa države članice ne želite odprti tretjega sklopa, ker menijo, da Srbija ne zasluži tega koraka. Kos je napovedala obisk Srbije 9. septembra.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around European Union values and the condemnation of glorifying war criminals, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize human rights, international law, and democratic principles. The emphasis on the EU’s stance against glorification of war criminals, M
Why factuality (85): The article reports accurately on Marta Kos’s comments regarding the EU stance on glorifying war criminals, including Mladić’s death sentence and his status as a convicted war criminal. It includes details about the reactions from Serbian officials like Nenad Vujić and Aleksandar Vučić, and confirms
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat emotionally charged, especially in the description of public reaction to Mladić’s death, with phrases like 'nič' and 'otrpljost.' The article also presents the EU position as a clear moral stance, which may reflect a biased perspective rather than a purely objective report.
The article reports on the funeral ceremony for former Bosnian Serb General Ratko Mladić in Belgrade, which drew thousands of attendees. The event took place at the Church of Saint Luke in Vidikovac, where Mladić’s remains were laid out until 12 PM. Attendees included military veterans, members of various Serbian military units, and supporters of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Notably, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić did not attend the funeral, citing a state visit to Uzbekistan. The funeral was organized by Mladić’s family, and there were calls for a state funeral in Serbia, though this was met with criticism. Following the funeral, the Serbian government plans to hold an emergency session of parliament and potentially dissolve the National Assembly.
Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive event involving high-profile figures and potential implications for Serbian politics, it presents information without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It includes multiple perspectives, such as the absence of Vučić and the involvement
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about the location (Ceremony at Vidikovac), the time frame (until 12:00), and mentions the presence of military honors and the participation of various groups such as veterans and the Russian motorcycle club 'Nočni volkovi'. These details align with the cross-so
Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'vojni zločinec' (war criminal) and describes the event as 'sramotni prizori' (shameful scenes), indicating a biased perspective. It also highlights the support from certain groups while omitting opposing viewpoints.
The President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska, Nenad Stevandić, accused the Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) constitutional court of effectively declaring war against the Republic of Srpska. He argued that the court’s decision to include a question regarding the Serbian member of the BiH presidency, Željka Cvijanović, into proceedings created a dangerous precedent. This came after Cvijanović used her veto power to block the appointment of new members to the commission for preserving national monuments, which included foreign experts. The BiH presidency then referred the issue to the constitutional court, claiming the National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska lacked authority over matters of external policy. Stevandić also linked the dispute to public reactions to the death of former Bosnian Serb military commander Ratko Mladić, suggesting some responses amounted to hatred and could constitute glorification of war criminals. The BiH prosecutor has received thousands of complaints since Mladić’s death, alleging violations related to the glorification of convicted war criminals.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the dispute as a threat to the sovereignty and legal framework of the Republic of Srpska, using strong language such as 'napovedana vojna' (declaration of war). It emphasizes the perceived illegitimacy of the BiH constitutional court’s actions and attributes external pressures to诋
Why factuality (85): The article reports on statements made by Nenad Stevandić regarding the Bosnian Herzegovina entity being 'predicted' as a war, referencing the process before the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the naming of a commission member. It provides details about the political dispute over
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the statements of Stevandić and includes quotes from him, but it also frames the situation in a way that suggests criticism of the Constitutional Court's actions. There is some bias in the interpretation of events, particularly in the implication that the court's decision was pr
The article reports on the death of Ratko Mladić, a former Bosnian Serb military commander wanted for war crimes. The tone is marked by silence and lack of reaction from individuals and platforms, with some users requesting that his image not be published. The piece includes a reference to an illustration depicting Mladić in uniform alongside symbolic imagery related to Srebrenica. The content is restricted to subscribers and reflects a subdued, almost somber atmosphere around the event.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the death of Ratko Mladić within a context that emphasizes the absence of public reaction and the request to avoid publishing his image, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives that often highlight human rights concerns and the legacy of wartime atrocities. The focus on the 't
Why factuality (80): This article provides a concise summary of Mladić’s death and the public response, including references to social media silence and artistic expressions. It mentions the black-and-white photo and the 'heavy silence,' but lacks detailed context about the EU’s stance or specific statements from offici
Why objectivity (65): The article has a very passive and almost indifferent tone, using phrases like 'Nič. Praznina. Ne reagiram.' This suggests an emotional detachment, possibly reflecting a critical or cynical viewpoint toward public reaction to Mladić’s death, rather than presenting a neutral account.
The European Commission's enlargement spokesperson, Marta Kos, criticized Serbian authorities for glorifying war criminal Ratko Mladić after his death, stating this contradicts core European values. She emphasized that Mladić was legally convicted for war crimes, including genocide in Srebrenica, and that the EU and aspiring member states have no room for such glorification. Serbian Minister of Justice Nenad Vujić announced plans to bury Mladić with state honors, while President Aleksandar Vučić noted international courts wanted him to die in prison, not in Serbia. International tribunals accused the Serb state of double standards. Mladić died in a Dutch prison after serving a life sentence for war crimes. Kos also discussed Serbia's progress toward EU membership, noting that Brussels had proposed opening a third chapter on economic competitiveness but that EU members deemed Serbia unready despite some progress. She warned against backsliding on freedom of expression and academic freedom, which citizens protested against.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of European Union values and criticizes Serbian actions as contradictory to these principles. The emphasis on Mladić’s legal conviction and the EU’s stance against glorifying war criminals reflects a left-leaning perspective aligned with European norms.
Why factuality (75): The article focuses on political tensions between Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, particularly around the constitutional court and the issue of glorifying war criminals. It cites statements from Nenad Stevandić and refers to the Dayton Agreement, providing some historical context. However, the articl
Why objectivity (60): The tone is more political and confrontational, suggesting a bias towards Serbian interests. The article frames the situation as a threat to Serbia, implying a negative view of the Bosnian government’s actions, which introduces a subjective angle rather than a balanced reporting.
The international community has been outraged by Serbia's decision to bury General Ratko Mladić, who was convicted of war crimes in The Hague, with military and state honors. This decision has sparked significant public anger, particularly in Slovenia, where many citizens, including members of the left, criticize the lack of similar recognition for those responsible for greater atrocities in Slovenian history. The article highlights how Slovenia still has numerous mass graves containing thousands of victims from the end of World War II, yet no one has been held accountable for these deaths. In contrast, perpetrators of these crimes are honored as heroes, with political figures placing wreaths at their memorials. The article also notes that former communist leaders, such as Janez Zemljarič, were buried with military honors despite their roles in repression during the communist era, and current political leaders continue to participate in commemorations under totalitarian symbols.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the criticism of Mladić's burial as hypocritical, pointing out that the Slovenian left does not similarly condemn historical figures from the communist era. It uses loaded language to describe the left as 'hypocritical' and criticizes their failure to address past atrocities, thus
Why factuality (75): The article provides accurate information about Mladić's burial arrangements and references his role in the Srebrenica genocide. It also mentions the international reaction and contrasts Slovenia’s approach with Serbia’s. However, some statements lack specific sourcing, such as the claim that 'Slove
Why objectivity (60): The article has a clear bias toward criticizing the Slovenian left for its perceived hypocrisy regarding communist figures. The tone is emotionally charged, using phrases like 'obsessed with communism' and 'ignoring Mladić’s roots,' which suggest an ideological stance rather than objective reporting
The President of Slovenia, Nataša Pirc Musar, made remarks during the awarding of the Blejski strategic forum 2026 prize to Ukrainian lawyer and Nobel laureate Aleksandra Matviichuk, stating that crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide must not go unpunished, regardless of who commits them. However, she was criticized for visiting the memorial of Boris Kidrič, a communist-era figure associated with wartime atrocities and mass killings of Slovenes and other Yugoslav peoples after World War II. The article highlights perceived hypocrisy, noting that while the president demands accountability for international crimes in places like Ukraine, she continues to honor figures linked to historical violence at home. Critics argue this represents selective morality, where domestic communist-era figures are treated differently compared to those abroad.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the president’s actions as hypocritical and selectively moral, criticizing her for honoring a communist-era figure while demanding justice for international crimes elsewhere. It uses strong language such as 'hypocrisy,' 'selective morality,' and 'shame' to highlight the contrast,
Why factuality (70): This article discusses Slovenia's stance on capital punishment, mentioning President Nataša Pirc Musar's comments and her actions towards Boris Kidrič. However, it lacks specific references to primary sources or official documents, making it harder to assess factual accuracy. The content appears mor
Why objectivity (50): The article has a strong subjective tone, using emotionally charged language such as 'hipokrizija' and 'sramota.' It presents a clear ideological critique of the president's behavior without offering balanced perspectives or alternative viewpoints.
The Bosnian government has announced sanctions against two Serbian officials following the state funeral of war criminal Radovan Mladić in Serbia. Foreign Minister Edin Konaković declared both Milan Dulanović, the military attache, and Danka Maksimović, a consultant at the Serbian embassy in Bosnia, as 'undesirable persons,' giving them 48 hours to leave the country. Diplomatic passports of these individuals will be revoked, and Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH) will cease diplomatic cooperation with them. The decision follows the funeral, which was attended by Serbian authorities and marked by military honors, prompting BiH to downgrade diplomatic relations with Serbia. Additionally, Bosnia has withdrawn its consent to a joint declaration on good neighborly relations and regional cooperation planned for October 1st. The European Union has expressed concern over Serbia’s actions, with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Council President Antonio Costa calling the attendance at Mladić’s funeral a violation of European values. However, the EU has not yet specified concrete consequences for Belgrade.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the action taken by Bosnia-Herzegovina as a justified response to Serbia's honoring of a convicted war criminal, aligning with international condemnation of such acts. It emphasizes the moral and legal implications of Serbia's actions, portraying them as a breach of European norms
Why factuality (70): The article accurately reports on Bosnia and Herzegovina's diplomatic response to Mladić's funeral, including the downgrade of relations with Serbia and the removal of personnel. It references official actions taken by Bosnian authorities and quotes relevant officials. However, it omits some context
Why objectivity (40): The article strongly criticizes Serbia and frames the situation as a violation of European values, using emotionally charged language like 'globoko obžalovanja vredno' (deeply regrettable). It presents the Bosnian perspective without adequately representing the Serbian viewpoint or providing balance
The article reports on the funeral arrangements for Ratko Mladić, the former Serbian military commander convicted of war crimes and genocide during the Bosnian War. His son, Darko Mladić, announced that a memorial ceremony will take place on Saturday at the Serbian Armed Forces House in Belgrade, followed by his burial on Monday at the Topčider cemetery. The Serbian president, Aleksandar Vučić, has confirmed he will not attend the funeral, citing prior commitments. The funeral organization is under the control of Mladić’s family, and there were reports that the Ministry of Justice considered granting him a state funeral. Mladić's remains were flown from the Netherlands to Serbia, where they were transported in a convoy with police and military honors. European Commission expansion commissioner Marta Kos criticized the glorification surrounding Mladić's death, stating it conflicts with European values. Mladić died in The Hague at age 85 after serving a life sentence for his crimes.
Bias read (Center): While the subject involves a controversial historical figure and international reactions, the article presents factual information about the funeral arrangements, quotes from multiple sources including family members and officials, and does not overtly favor any particular political stance. It also,
Why factuality (65): The article provides factual details about the funeral arrangements for Ratko Mladić, including dates, locations, and statements from his son and Serbian officials. However, it does not mention Mladić's status as a convicted war criminal or the nature of his crimes, which are critical context from t
Why objectivity (35): The article has a clear bias in favor of Mladić, referring to him as 'obsojenega vojnega zločinca' (convicted military criminal) but presenting his funeral with respect and mentioning the honor given to him by the family. It also criticizes the Serbian government for allowing such honors, suggesting
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
