Former President Jacob Zuma's private visit to India has sparked controversy in South African political circles, with differing responses from government officials. Minister Khumbudzo Ntshavheni criticized the visit, arguing it undermines South Africa's criminal justice system and foreign policy, particularly concerning efforts to extradite the fugitive Gupta brothers. She expressed concern that government representatives abroad should uphold the law rather than assist individuals facing criminal charges. In contrast, Foreign Affairs Minister Lindiwe Mashatile defended the diplomatic protocol, stating that embassies routinely support former heads of state during international engagements. He cited his own recent visit to India as an example of such support. The controversy deepened when DA MP Ryan Smith revealed that High Commissioner Anil Sooklal was instructed to facilitate Zuma's visit, raising questions about diplomatic practices and transparency. Media reports suggested Sooklal was unaware of the presence of Ajay Gupta during Zuma's address at a temple in Haridwar, adding to the scrutiny of the situation.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the criticism of Zuma's visit through the lens of institutional integrity and legal accountability, aligning with progressive values of upholding the rule of law. While the article presents both perspectives, the emphasis on the potential undermining of South Africa's judicial and



