The president of the National Council, Zoran Stevanović, has responded to a proposal by the opposition to remove him from office, stating that the proposal is based on incorrect assumptions. He argues that he has fulfilled his constitutional and parliamentary duties by calling two extraordinary sessions within the legal timeframe, including all requested agenda items, and allowing the National Council to make decisions. Stevanović emphasizes that the process of calling sessions and determining the agenda are separate procedures, and that the opposition incorrectly equates them. He asserts that he does not have authority over the outcome of votes or the responsibility for decisions made by parliamentarians, and that the opposition’s claim lacks legal basis. Political commentators suggest the motion is more about testing the coalition's strength than a genuine attempt to remove him.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced defense from the subject (Stevanović) against the opposition's motion, without overtly favoring either side. It explains the procedural arguments and legal framework without taking a clear ideological stance. The tone remains objective, focusing on facts and legal nuu



![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2FSona-24July2026.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)


