ON
← Back to feed
The public service must ensure pluralism and the same standards apply to all authorities
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter

The public service must ensure pluralism and the same standards apply to all authorities

The Slovenian Association of Journalists and Publicists (ZNP) expresses concern over repeated criticisms from viewers regarding the political and ideological imbalance in Television Slovenia (RTV Slovenija) programs. The latest complaint focuses on the September 13, 2026 episode of 'Politično' hosted by Tanja Gobec, where two former politicians with similar critical views on the current government discussed politics without a guest representing opposing arguments. ZNP emphasizes that they do not advocate for rigid rules requiring opposing viewpoints in every segment, but rather for balanced representation of facts and contexts. They argue that the issue lies in a recurring pattern of similar guests and perspectives, which limits pluralism. ZNP calls for public officials to respond to questions posed to journalists and the public media service, noting that RTV Slovenija has a unique role due to its public funding model. However, they acknowledge that this special status comes with specific legal obligations that private media do not share.

The Združenje novinarjev in publicistov (ZNp) has issued a statement addressing concerns raised by viewers regarding political and ideological imbalance in certain programs of RTV Slovenia, particularly the September 13, 2026 episode of Politično s Tanjo Gobec. In this segment, two former politicians, Pavel Gantar and Miha Brejc, discussed current governance with a shared critical perspective on the government’s actions, without including a guest who could present alternative viewpoints or defend governmental decisions. This incident has reignited discussions over whether RTV Slovenia adequately ensures pluralism in its coverage of political and societal issues. The ZNP expressed concern that such imbalances are not isolated incidents but part of a recurring pattern. They noted that the issue extends beyond a single show or guest, pointing to a broader trend where similar guests and perspectives dominate programming. Over time, this repetition limits the diversity of opinions presented, undermining the principle of balanced reporting. The organization emphasized that while it does not advocate for rigid rules requiring opposing views in every segment, it insists on equitable representation of facts and positions, along with comprehensive contextual information. RTV Slovenia, as a public service broadcaster funded through mandatory contributions from all citizens, holds a unique responsibility to provide objective and impartial information. According to the Law on Radio and Television in Slovenia, RTV Slovenia is legally obligated to ensure credible and unbiased informational content that fully informs the public about political developments and enables objective public awareness. Article 5 of the law explicitly requires adherence to principles of truthfulness, impartiality, completeness, political balance, and global ideological pluralism, ensuring citizens can form independent opinions. The ZNP reiterated that while public officials should respond to questions posed by journalists and the public media, RTV Slovenia must equally fulfill its legal duty to maintain nonpartisan, comprehensive, and politically balanced reporting. The organization stated that it expects RTV Slovenia to uphold these standards, just as it expects political leaders to engage with the public through the media. The ZNP highlighted that past complaints about unbalanced guest selection and viewpoints have been raised repeatedly, yet they were often dismissed as routine dissatisfaction with specific program content. However, the organization maintains that such feedback should be treated as part of a larger, persistent pattern rather than individual grievances. It stressed that RTV Slovenia's role as a public service institution necessitates greater accountability in maintaining journalistic integrity and fairness. In conclusion, the ZNP called for RTV Slovenia to take decisive action to address these concerns, aligning its practices with its legal obligations and public mandate. The situation remains under review, with ongoing scrutiny into how the broadcaster fulfills its responsibilities to the public.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Domovina logoDomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 90
[Received] ZNP: Public service must ensure pluralism, and the same standards must apply to all authorities

The Association of Journalists and Publicists of Slovenia (ZNP) has issued a statement responding to viewer complaints about political and ideological imbalance in Television Slovenia (RTV Ljubljana) programs. The complaints specifically reference an episode of the 'Politično' show featuring two former politicians with similar critical views of the current government, without a guest representing opposing arguments. ZNP emphasizes that while they do not advocate for rigid rules requiring opposing viewpoints in every segment, they demand balanced representation of facts and perspectives, along with comprehensive context. They argue that the issue is not isolated to one show but reflects a broader pattern of repetitive guests and viewpoints, undermining pluralism. ZNP calls for public officials to respond to questions posed by journalists and the public media service, highlighting RTV Slovenia’s unique role as a publicly funded service. They stress that this relationship is not one-sided, as RTV Slovenia holds a special public mandate.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced critique of potential biases in RTV Slovenia programming without overtly favoring any political side. It highlights concerns raised by viewers and responds with a call for journalistic responsibility and public accountability, without taking a partisan stance. The ZNP

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the concerns raised by the Združenje novinarjev in publicistov regarding perceived political imbalance in RTV Slovenia programs. It includes specific details such as the date of the program (13 September 2026) and the names of the guests (Pavel Gantar and Miha Brejc).

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the concerns of the ZNP without overt bias or emotional language. It acknowledges the complexity of ensuring impartiality and avoids taking sides, focusing instead on the need for pluralism and balanced reporting.

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 94Objective 89
The public service must ensure pluralism and the same standards apply to all authorities

The Slovenian Association of Journalists and Publicists (ZNP) expresses concern over repeated criticisms from viewers regarding the political and ideological imbalance in Television Slovenia (RTV Slovenija) programs. The latest complaint focuses on the September 13, 2026 episode of 'Politično' hosted by Tanja Gobec, where two former politicians with similar critical views on the current government discussed politics without a guest representing opposing arguments. ZNP emphasizes that they do not advocate for rigid rules requiring opposing viewpoints in every segment, but rather for balanced representation of facts and contexts. They argue that the issue lies in a recurring pattern of similar guests and perspectives, which limits pluralism. ZNP calls for public officials to respond to questions posed to journalists and the public media service, noting that RTV Slovenija has a unique role due to its public funding model. However, they acknowledge that this special status comes with specific legal obligations that private media do not share.

Bias read (Center): While the article criticizes RTV Slovenija's programming for lacking pluralism, it does not take a clear partisan stance. It presents concerns raised by viewers and highlights the association’s call for balance and accountability without overtly favoring any political ideology. The tone remains fact

Why factuality (94): This article mirrors the first in content and structure, accurately reflecting the ZNP’s concerns about RTV Slovenia’s programming. It provides similar details about the specific episode and guests involved. Like the first article, it stops mid-sentence but remains largely aligned with the cross-sou

Why objectivity (89): The article presents the issue in a neutral manner, emphasizing the need for balance and pluralism without favoring any particular viewpoint. However, there is a slight lean toward highlighting the problem rather than offering a more neutral analysis of potential solutions.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories