ON
← Back to feed
We know what the coalition would do to RTVS.
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter2 hr. ago

We know what the coalition would do to RTVS.

The proposed changes to Slovenia's media support system aim to reform financial aid for media outlets and restructure the governance of RTVS (Radio Television of Slovenia). Key elements include shifting funding toward content creation in the public interest, particularly cultural and artistic programming, while removing mandatory funding levels for such purposes. The proposal eliminates support for non-governmental organizations in media development and focuses funds directly on media production and distribution. It also excludes media linked to program networks from financial support, emphasizing the goal of promoting media pluralism and editorial independence. Additionally, the plan transfers oversight of media market concentration to the national communications regulator, AKOS, and revises ownership disclosure rules to allow only physical persons as legal owners. The governance structure of RTVS would be reformed by replacing its current board with a program council and a supervisory council based on professional expertise. Transitional provisions state that if the law is adopted, current members of RTVS’s governing bodies would lose their mandates.

A new proposal has emerged regarding the future management and financial support of RTVS, Slovenia's public broadcaster. The plan, which was published on e-democracy platforms, outlines several key changes aimed at restructuring how media funding is allocated and how the organization is governed. Among these changes is a shift in the management structure of RTVS, moving toward a system led by a board of directors and a program committee, while eliminating the current financial council. The proposed law focuses on reforming the financial support framework for media organizations. It emphasizes funding for the creation of content in the public interest, particularly cultural and artistic programming. Under this model, the mandatory level of funds previously set by law would be removed, allowing more flexibility in allocation based on actual needs rather than fixed percentages. Additionally, the proposal suggests ending the possibility of financing non-governmental organizations in the field of media, as well as the development of new formats and tools for journalistic work, with funds directed instead towards direct media activities and the production and dissemination of content in the public interest. However, the proposal retains the option of supporting the transition of print media to digital platforms, though this will no longer be a legal obligation. Instead, such support will depend on market demands and the country’s public finances. This change aims to align funding with contemporary media trends while maintaining state responsibility for core public service functions. Another major point of the proposal involves removing media entities connected to program networks from the list of eligible recipients for financial support. The rationale is that the budgetary resources intended for media should primarily promote media diversity, editorial independence, and self-produced content. This move reflects a broader effort to ensure that public funds serve their intended purpose without subsidizing existing structures that may limit competition or innovation. The proposal also plans to transfer the responsibility for assessing media concentration on the national market to the National Communications Agency and Services (AKOS). Furthermore, it calls for amendments to disclosure requirements regarding media ownership, ensuring that the actual owner can only be listed as a physical person, thereby preventing opaque corporate structures from influencing media operations. In terms of governance, the proposal revises the leadership structure of RTVS. The current advisory board would be replaced by a program committee, similar to the one RTVS had in the past. The financial council would be replaced by a supervisory board, with the four-member executive body being replaced by a single chief executive officer. This change is meant to streamline decision-making and clarify accountability within the public broadcasting institution. The composition of the supervisory board is designed around professional expertise, focusing on individuals with knowledge in media, law, public finance, economics, accounting, and corporate governance. This approach aims to bring in diverse perspectives that could enhance the quality and relevance of RTVS's output. Transitional provisions indicate that the mandates of members of the RTVS board, the Financial Council, and the executive body will expire upon the enactment of the law, signaling a clean break from the previous administration. These measures aim to create a fresh start for RTVS, aligning its operations with modern standards and expectations. The reform also touches on the funding of ethnic programs and music productions, retaining the requirement for state funding of these activities as part of public service duties. However, it removes the legally mandated percentage-based allocation of funds tied to the TV contribution, replacing it with a more flexible approach that still ensures public service obligations are met.

2 reports

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedCenter2 hr. ago
Freeing the hijacked media space

The article discusses the need for greater media pluralism in Slovenia, arguing that despite existing laws and regulatory frameworks, the media landscape remains dominated by a small group of owners. The author highlights historical examples where media concentration was addressed, such as when the newspaper 'Delo' was required to sell 'Večer' due to ownership concentration. The piece emphasizes that the state has a responsibility to ensure diverse voices in the media, especially in radio, which once had a decentralized structure but has since become concentrated through purchases and network connections. The author calls for structural changes to prevent further consolidation of media power, noting that traditional metrics like frequency counts are insufficient in the digital age, where online platforms and streaming services also influence public opinion.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a critical view of media concentration in Slovenia but does not exhibit overt ideological bias. It calls for structural reforms and references past regulatory actions without favoring any specific political ideology. The tone is analytical and focused on institutional reform, es

Reporter logoReporterIndependentCenter3 days ago
We know what the coalition would do to RTVS.

The proposed changes to Slovenia's media support system aim to reform financial aid for media outlets and restructure the governance of RTVS (Radio Television of Slovenia). Key elements include shifting funding toward content creation in the public interest, particularly cultural and artistic programming, while removing mandatory funding levels for such purposes. The proposal eliminates support for non-governmental organizations in media development and focuses funds directly on media production and distribution. It also excludes media linked to program networks from financial support, emphasizing the goal of promoting media pluralism and editorial independence. Additionally, the plan transfers oversight of media market concentration to the national communications regulator, AKOS, and revises ownership disclosure rules to allow only physical persons as legal owners. The governance structure of RTVS would be reformed by replacing its current board with a program council and a supervisory council based on professional expertise. Transitional provisions state that if the law is adopted, current members of RTVS’s governing bodies would lose their mandates.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a detailed overview of proposed legislative changes to media financing and RTVS governance without overtly favoring any political side. It outlines specific policy proposals neutrally, focusing on structural reforms rather than ideological arguments. There is no evident bias in措

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories