Known date of commencement of the call for signatures for the referendum on the intervention law

The Slovenia TimesIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 907 days ago

The centre-left opposition in Slovenia has filed a motion to remove Zoran Stevanović from his position as National Assembly president, accusing him of violating constitutional procedures and failing to uphold the rights of the opposition. This follows repeated rejections of emergency session agendas aimed at launching parliamentary inquiries into the Black Cube scandal, which involves allegations of foreign election interference and illegal funding of political parties. Opposition leaders argue that Stevanović participated in procedural maneuvers that blocked these inquiries, thereby breaching constitutional principles. They emphasize that the National Assembly president is responsible for preventing such abuses and ensuring compliance with the constitution. Constitutional law experts have reportedly supported the opposition’s claims, stating that Stevanović’s actions undermined the rule of law and the rights of parliamentary minorities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the centre-left opposition's accusations against Zoran Stevanović, emphasizing their framing of his actions as constitutional breaches and failures to uphold democratic processes. The language used by opposition figures like Luka Mesec and Meira Hot highlights a strong critique,

Why factuality (95): The article accurately represents the primary source, explaining Stevanović’s response to the opposition’s motion. It clearly outlines the procedural steps taken by the president of the National Assembly and refutes the opposition’s claims based on legal reasoning. No unsupported claims are made.

Why objectivity (90): The tone is formal and objective, focusing on legal arguments and procedural explanations. There is no evident bias or emotional language, making the article highly balanced.

Primorske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 907 days ago

The Slovenian opposition parties, including Levica, SD, and Freedom, have proposed the removal of Dušan Stevanović from his position as President of the National Assembly. They argue that Stevanović has violated the constitution by failing to prevent abuses of parliamentary procedures. Specifically, they accuse him of voting against the adoption of agendas for extraordinary sessions that would establish investigative committees into issues such as Black Cube and electoral financing. The opposition claims this behavior undermines constitutional rights, including those of parliamentary minorities and the principle of the rule of law. Stevanović and the governing coalition have defended their actions, stating that MPs are not bound by any instructions and acted in accordance with the constitution. However, the opposition argues that this interpretation is incorrect, as independence does not mean being above the constitution. Additionally, references were made to the Mijič affair, which further fueled calls for Stevanović’s removal.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents arguments from left-wing and opposition parties (Levica, SD) criticizing Stevanović's conduct as unconstitutional and undermining democratic principles. The framing emphasizes violations of the constitution and the rule of law, while the governing coalition's defense is briefly,

Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the primary source, detailing the opposition’s motion and the reasons behind it. It includes direct quotes from opposition leaders and explains the legal grounds for their action, ensuring factual consistency.

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both the opposition’s stance and the rationale behind their decision. It avoids taking sides and focuses on the procedural and legal aspects.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 507 days ago

The left opposition in Slovenia has proposed the removal of Zoran Stevanović, the president of the National Assembly, alleging that he violates the constitution by failing to establish opposition parliamentary inquiry committees on the Black Cube case and allegations of illegal funding of political parties. The opposition claims that Stevanović, who holds three positions, parliamentary and two presidential roles, has acted inconsistently by voting in favor of certain motions while opposing others, thereby undermining constitutional principles. Opposition leaders, including Borut Sajovic from the Freedom Party and Meira Hot from the Slovenian Democratic Party, argue that Stevanović has lost legitimacy to lead the National Assembly and that his actions demonstrate a lack of respect for the constitution, laws, and parliamentary procedures. They emphasize that the proposal aims to highlight the illegality of his conduct and potentially encourage him to resign.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Stevanović’s alleged constitutional violations and highlights the left opposition’s unified stance against him. It emphasizes their argument that his actions undermine democratic processes and the rule of law, using strong language like 'crimes' and 'legitim

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the allegations against Stevanović and includes direct quotes from Borut Sajovic. It aligns closely with the primary source document and provides factual background on the constitutional issues at stake.

Why objectivity (50): The article is clearly biased against Stevanović, using strong language to condemn his actions. It lacks neutrality and presents the situation from a perspective that favors the opposition without providing opposing viewpoints.

MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago

The Slovenian government, led by Prime Minister Janez Janša, has opposed proposed changes to the criminal code aimed at making the prosecution of adults who attempt to engage minors under 15 years old in sexual relationships more effective. The opposition had previously introduced a legislative proposal to make such attempts punishable, but the government argues that the current legal framework adequately addresses these cases. A notable example cited involves former mayor Matej Zorko (SDS), who was not penalized for attempting to engage minors in sexual acts because they were older than 15 and had lured him into a trap. The government’s position is that increasing penalties for attempted offenses is unnecessary, though the document mentions this case as a reason for opposing the change. Opposition MP Marjeta Pecnik criticized the government’s stance, calling it incomprehensible given the importance of protecting children online.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the government's opposition to stricter penalties for attempted child sexual abuse and the opposition's argument for stronger protections. It includes direct quotes from both sides and does not favor one over the other in tone or framing. The article provides context aboutZ

Why factuality (90): The article provides specific details about the proposed legal change, mentions the government's opposition, references the Zorko case as an example, and quotes the government's reasoning from their official statement. All these points align with the cross-source consensus, though some contextual nu

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the situation fairly neutrally, citing both the opposition’s argument and the government’s stance. However, the tone slightly leans toward the opposition by emphasizing 'logical' and 'necessary' changes, which could imply a subtle bias.

LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 856 days ago

President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović has rejected a proposal for his removal, arguing that it is based on a mistaken assumption that he failed to fulfill his duties. The proposal, backed by opposition parties, called for extraordinary sessions of the National Assembly and the establishment of investigative commissions regarding Black Cube and regional funding allegations. Stevanović’s cabinet denied claims that he interfered with the process, stating that he lawfully called the extraordinary sessions, included all requested agenda items, and allowed the National Assembly to decide on the matter. They argue that the proposal misrepresents two distinct phases of parliamentary procedure, calling for extraordinary sessions versus determining the agenda, and that the president does not hold responsibility for the outcome of votes. Stevanović emphasized that the process adheres to legal and constitutional standards and called for transparency, urging all parties to follow the same rules.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the opposition's claim against Stevanović and the defense provided by his cabinet, without overtly favoring either side. While the issue involves political conflict, the framing remains balanced, focusing on legal arguments rather than ideological slant. There is no clear倾向

Why factuality (90): The article aligns with the primary source, describing the opposition’s planned motion and the reasons behind it. It references the legal framework and includes quotes from officials, ensuring factual accuracy.

Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral, presenting the opposition’s position without overt bias. It includes both the opposition’s claims and the procedural justification provided by Stevanović’s team.

Info360IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 857 days ago

The president of the National Council, Zoran Stevanović, has responded to a proposal by the opposition to remove him from office, stating that the proposal is based on incorrect assumptions. He argues that he has fulfilled his constitutional and parliamentary duties by calling two extraordinary sessions within the legal timeframe, including all requested agenda items, and allowing the National Council to make decisions. Stevanović emphasizes that the process of calling sessions and determining the agenda are separate procedures, and that the opposition incorrectly equates them. He asserts that he does not have authority over the outcome of votes or the responsibility for decisions made by parliamentarians, and that the opposition’s claim lacks legal basis. Political commentators suggest the motion is more about testing the coalition's strength than a genuine attempt to remove him.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced defense from the subject (Stevanović) against the opposition's motion, without overtly favoring either side. It explains the procedural arguments and legal framework without taking a clear ideological stance. The tone remains objective, focusing on facts and legal nuu

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the primary source, discussing the opposition’s motion and the legal basis for their claims. It cites specific actions by Stevanović and quotes officials involved, maintaining alignment with the original report.

Why objectivity (85): While the article presents the opposition’s concerns, it also includes quotes from officials supporting Stevanović, providing a balanced view. The tone remains professional and avoids overtly emotional language.

Slovenske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 857 days ago

Three opposition figures in Slovenia, Borut Sajovic of Svoboda, Luka Mesec of Levice, and Meira Hot of SD, have submitted a proposal to remove the President of the National Assembly (DZ), Zoran Stevanović. The move comes amid disputes over the establishment of opposition investigative committees regarding Black Cube and local party financing. The DZ has twice rejected the agenda for extraordinary sessions aimed at setting up these committees. Opposition members accuse Stevanović of violating the constitutional order by blocking the agenda. Sajovic emphasized that the current president is acting against the constitution, citing legal experts who agree. Hot claims Stevanović lacks legitimacy and is playing games, while Mesec asserts that Stevanović has failed repeatedly over six weeks and should resign.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition's actions as justified under the constitution, using strong language like 'zdrs' (manipulation) and 'narobe' (wrongly). It emphasizes legal experts supporting the opposition's stance and portrays the president as intentionally undermining institutional integrity. Sj

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the primary source, outlining the opposition’s motion and the legal arguments used against Stevanović. It includes quotes from opposition figures and explains the procedural context, staying true to the original report.

Why objectivity (85): The tone is balanced, presenting the opposition’s case while acknowledging the legal defences put forward by Stevanović. It avoids emotional language and stays focused on the facts.

Ljubljanske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 807 days ago

In Slovenia, opposition parties Movement for Freedom, SD, and Left have proposed a motion to remove President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović. However, they currently hold only 40 parliamentary votes, short of the required 46 for a successful vote. The article outlines various potential strategies the opposition could employ to reach the necessary majority, including persuading members of the ruling coalition, seeking support from minority communities, or using procedural tactics. However, all these options are deemed unlikely to succeed. The article concludes that while the motion itself has little chance of success, it serves as a symbolic gesture intended to highlight their political efforts, even if it ultimately fails.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the situation, outlining the challenges faced by the opposition without overtly criticizing or praising any side. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather explains the political mechanics and limitations involved. While there is some editorial nu

Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed information on the opposition’s attempt to remove Stevanović, including the required majority and current shortfall. It accurately reflects the procedural requirements and the political challenges involved, aligning closely with other sources. No significant factual di

Why objectivity (80): The article remains largely neutral, presenting both the opposition’s challenge and the ruling coalition’s response. While there is some emphasis on the difficulty of achieving the necessary votes, it avoids overt bias or emotional language.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 808 days ago

The article reports that the opposition in Slovenia plans to submit a motion for the removal of President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović, citing violations of constitutional order. The main reason for this move relates to the establishment of opposition investigative committees by the National Council (DZ) regarding Black Cube and party funding. The DZ has twice rejected requests for extraordinary sessions to establish these committees. Stevanović and his coalition members voted against the agenda, leading to accusations of violating constitutional provisions. Constitutional lawyers have stated that the requirement for a parliamentary inquiry when requested by a third of deputies is clear, and both the coalition and Resnica are breaching this. Additionally, there are allegations against Resnica MP Boris Mijič, who allegedly owes money to employees, the Financial Administration, and co-operatives, while misleading about his education. Stevanović initially promised to settle Mijič’s debts but later threatened to propose the strictest measures against him. This would be the 11th attempt to remove a DZ president, with previous attempts targeting seven predecessors.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the political conflict surrounding the potential removal of Zoran Stevanović, including perspectives from both the opposition and the ruling coalition. It includes quotes from constitutional experts and outlines the legal arguments on both sides without明显的偏

Why factuality (90): This article is nearly identical to the primary source document, providing precise details about the opposition's motion, Stevanović's explanations, and the status of Mijič. It uses the same sources and structure, ensuring high factual accuracy.

Why objectivity (80): The article is very neutral and objective, presenting facts without added commentary or emotional language. It avoids taking sides and simply reports the events as they unfold.

DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 90Objective 507 days ago

The opposition in Slovenia has called for the removal of Zoran Stevanović, the Speaker of the National Assembly (DZ), accusing him of violating constitutional order, collaborating in the abuse of parliamentary procedures, and failing to protect the constitutional rights of the opposition. The opposition parties Sloboda, SDS, and Ljubljana (Levica) argue that Stevanović’s actions, including his vote against the call for extraordinary sessions to investigate issues related to Black Cube and local funding, constitute a breach of the constitution. They claim he has undermined the principle of a rule of law by acting outside legal frameworks and failing to uphold democratic standards. Opposition leaders such as Luka Mesec and Borut Sajovic emphasize that the Speaker should act as a role model and ensure adherence to constitutional principles, particularly in protecting minority rights within the assembly.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Stevanović’s alleged violations of constitutional norms and democratic standards, aligning with the opposition’s stance. It emphasizes the need for accountability and adherence to constitutional principles, which are typically associated with left-leaning or

Why factuality (90): The article accurately summarizes the allegations against Stevanović, citing specific actions such as voting against the agenda of extraordinary sessions. It reflects the primary source document's content but omits some contextual details about the internal party dynamics.

Why objectivity (50): The article takes an overtly critical stance toward Stevanović, labeling him as someone who 'exploits the constitution.' The language is biased and lacks neutrality, focusing on condemning his actions without presenting counterarguments or balanced perspectives.

MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 787 days ago

The President of the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, has defended himself against allegations of misconduct related to his role in organizing extraordinary sessions of the National Assembly. He claims that the proposal for his removal is based on a mistaken assumption that he failed to fulfill his duties. According to Stevanović’s office, he called both extraordinary sessions within legal timeframes and included all requested items on the agenda, allowing the National Assembly to decide on them. They argue that the proposal for his dismissal does not indicate any violation of the constitution or assembly rules but rather stems from disagreement with the majority decision on the agenda. Stevanović emphasized that his responsibility is to ensure the legal process and enable the National Assembly to make decisions, which he asserts he did. His office also clarified that the proposal incorrectly equates two distinct phases of the parliamentary process: calling an extraordinary session and deciding on the agenda.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Stevanović's defense of his actions and the arguments made by his office regarding the allegations against him. It includes direct quotes from both the accused and his representatives, providing a balanced view of the situation without overtly favoring one side over the other. S

Why factuality (88): This article provides detailed information about Stevanović's defense against the motion, including quotes from his cabinet and legal interpretations. It aligns closely with the primary source and includes additional context about the legal framework. Minor discrepancies exist in phrasing compared t

Why objectivity (78): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting both the opposition's allegations and Stevanović's defense. However, there is a subtle emphasis on the legal justification for Stevanović's actions, which could be seen as slightly favoring his position.

DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 88Objective 707 days ago

The opposition plans to submit an 11th motion to remove Zoran Stevanović, the president of the National Assembly (DZ), over alleged violations of constitutional procedures. The motion stems from disputes surrounding the establishment of investigative committees into issues related to Black Cube and the financing of political parties. The National Assembly twice rejected proposals to hold extraordinary sessions needed to form these committees, with Stevanović voting against the agenda. The opposition argues that Stevanović and the ruling coalition violated constitutional rules by failing to schedule the sessions. Stevanović defended his actions, stating that the opposition believes each request should be addressed individually on their own agendas. Constitutional lawyers confirmed that the assembly must comply with the requirement to establish investigations if requested by a third of MPs, which the ruling coalition and Stevanović allegedly ignored. Additionally, there are reports that the incident involves Boris Mijič, a member of the opposition party Resnica.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the opposition’s accusations and Stevanović’s defense, citing constitutional experts who confirm the legal basis for the claims. It does not favor one side over the other but provides balanced perspectives from all involved parties.

Why factuality (88): The article accurately covers the opposition's planned motion, Stevanović's justification, and the legal analysis. It stays close to the primary source and avoids introducing false claims.

Why objectivity (70): There is a slight bias toward the opposition, with a focus on their justified actions and a less balanced treatment of Stevanović's arguments. The tone leans slightly in favor of the opposition.

Maribor24IndependentProgressiveFactual 88Objective 708 days ago

The opposition in Slovenia has announced plans to submit a proposal for the removal of Državnega zbornika (National Assembly) president Zoran Stevanović, citing violations of constitutional order. The opposition alleges that Stevanović and his coalition blocked the establishment of two investigative committees by refusing to approve the agenda for extraordinary sessions. These committees aim to investigate allegations against the company Black Cube and potential circumstantial funding of political parties. Stevanović defended his actions, arguing that each request for an investigative committee should be addressed separately. Ustavni pravniki (constitutional lawyers) stated that the National Assembly should have convened these committees as required by law. Additionally, there were allegations against a member of the Resnica faction, Boris Mijič, regarding unpaid debts and fraudulent claims about his education. This would mark the eleventh attempt to remove a National Assembly president in Slovenian history.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition's actions as justified under constitutional principles, emphasizing legal arguments and highlighting alleged misconduct by Stevanović and his coalition. It presents the opposition's stance as aligned with democratic accountability and the rule of law, while Stevanov

Why factuality (88): The article accurately details the opposition’s call for a motion to remove Stevanović, referencing the procedural issues and the legal arguments made by constitutional lawyers. It aligns with other reports on the matter and provides clear context on the ongoing dispute.

Why objectivity (70): The tone suggests support for the opposition’s claim that the ruling coalition is violating the constitution. While factual, it implies that the opposition’s actions are justified, which could be interpreted as leaning toward their perspective.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 87Objective 768 days ago

The opposition in Slovenia is reportedly planning to submit a motion to remove Zoran Stevanović from his position as President of the National Assembly, accusing him of violating constitutional procedures. The main issue stems from the failure of the National Assembly to approve the agenda for extraordinary sessions aimed at establishing investigative committees into the Black Cube scandal and the financing of political parties. Stevanović, who is also the leader of the opposition party Resnica, voted against the session agenda, which the opposition claims violates constitutional rules requiring the assembly to establish investigations if requested by a third of MPs. Additionally, there are allegations related to Boris Mijič, a member of Resnica, involving financial misconduct and misrepresentation of his educational background. This would be the 11th attempt to remove a president of the National Assembly, though previous efforts have all failed.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the opposition's accusations and Stevanović's defense, including quotes from legal experts and references to constitutional arguments. It does not favor one side over the other but provides balanced information on the dispute and its historical context.

Why factuality (87): The article accurately reflects the situation, including the reasons behind the opposition's move and Stevanović's explanation. It cites the same sources as the primary document and covers most relevant details. There is minimal deviation from the primary source, making it highly factual.

Why objectivity (76): While the article remains largely neutral, it subtly frames the opposition's actions as justified, giving them more space than Stevanović's defense. This shows a minor tilt toward the opposition's narrative.

DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 757 days ago

The opposition in Slovenia is reportedly planning to submit a motion to remove Zoran Stevanović, the president of the National Assembly (DZ), over alleged violations of constitutional procedures. The main issue centers around the failure of the DZ to approve the agenda for extraordinary sessions aimed at establishing investigative committees into the Black Cube scandal and the financing of political parties. Stevanović, who is also the leader of the opposition party Resnica, voted against the session agendas, which the opposition claims violates constitutional rules requiring the assembly to establish investigations if requested by a third of MPs. Constitutional lawyers have confirmed this interpretation, stating that the coalition and Resnica have breached these provisions. Additional concerns include allegations against Resnica MP Boris Mijič regarding financial misconduct and misrepresentation of his educational background. This would be the 11th attempt to remove a DZ president, though previous efforts have all failed.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition's actions as justified based on constitutional law and highlights their grievances with the current leadership, suggesting a critical stance toward the ruling coalition and Stevanović’s handling of parliamentary procedures. It emphasizes the legal arguments made by宪

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the planned motion to remove Zoran Stevanović from his position, citing the alleged violation of constitutional order due to the rejection of opposition investigative committees. It references sources like STA and POP TV, aligning with the primary source document. Howe

Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral but leans slightly towards supporting the opposition’s stance by emphasizing the constitutional violations. The article presents both sides of the argument but gives more weight to the opposition's perspective, showing a slight bias.

VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 758 days ago

The article reports on opposition plans to submit a motion for the removal of the Speaker of the Slovenian Parliament, Zoran Stevanović, due to alleged violations of constitutional order. The opposition claims that Stevanović failed to schedule extraordinary sessions for the establishment of investigative committees regarding Black Cube and party financing, and he himself voted against the agenda. The opposition alleges that this constitutes a breach of constitutional provisions requiring parliamentary inquiry if requested by a third of deputies. Constitutional lawyers involved in a parliamentary committee confirmed that the constitutional provision is clear and that both coalition and Resnica parties are violating it. Additionally, there are allegations against Resnica MP Boris Mijič for financial misconduct, including unpaid wages, taxes, and debts to co-workers and partners. Stevanović initially promised to settle Mijič’s debts but later threatened to impose strict measures against him. This would be the 11th attempt to remove a Speaker of the Slovenian Parliament, with previous attempts targeting seven predecessors.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition's actions as justified under constitutional law, emphasizing their adherence to legal procedures and highlighting potential violations by Stevanović. It presents the opposition's stance as legitimate and criticizes Stevanović's actions as unconstitutional. While the

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the planned motion to remove Stevanović, the reasons given by the opposition, and the legal arguments presented by constitutional lawyers. It maintains consistency with other sources on the issue of procedural violations and the formation of investigative committees.

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the opposition’s case but also highlights the government’s justification, maintaining some balance. However, it gives more weight to the opposition’s argument that the ruling coalition is violating the constitution, which could be seen as slightly biased.

Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 758 days ago

The opposition plans to submit a motion to remove Zoran Stevanović, the president of the National Assembly (DZ), due to alleged violations of constitutional procedures. The main issue revolves around the failure to approve the agenda for extraordinary sessions aimed at establishing investigative committees into the Black Cube scandal and the financing of political parties. Stevanović faced criticism for voting against the session agenda and for not ensuring the formation of these committees. Constitutional lawyers have stated that the National Assembly must establish parliamentary investigations if requested by a third of MPs, which both the coalition and the opposition have allegedly violated. Additionally, there are reports that the motion could also relate to the actions of Boris Mijič, a member of the opposition Resnica party, who has been accused of financial misconduct and misrepresenting his educational background.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives, including claims from the opposition, statements from Stevanović, and opinions from constitutional experts. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side but rather provides a balanced account of the situation and the arguments made by different actors

Why factuality (85): The article discusses the legal implications of Mijič’s actions and the role of the Delavska svetovalnica. It aligns with the primary source but adds commentary on the broader issue of worker exploitation, which is not explicitly mentioned in the primary document.

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat critical of Mijič and the system he represents, using phrases like 'izigravanje delavcev' which carry a judgmental connotation. While informative, it leans toward a more opinionated stance.

Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 706 days ago

The article discusses a proposed motion by opposition parties, Freedom, Left, and SDS, to remove Zoran Stevanović, the President of the National Assembly, citing alleged violations of constitutional order. The motion accuses him of failing to establish investigative committees during an extraordinary session and of enabling the ruling party's governance under Janez Janša. Political commentator Aljuš Pertinač criticizes the move as politically motivated revenge against Stevanović for not joining the government of Robert Golob after the elections. He argues the motion lacks practical chances of success and serves as a symbolic gesture rather than a genuine attempt to hold Stevanović accountable. Pertinač suggests the opposition is stuck in personal vendettas and media spectacle rather than developing substantive policies.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the situation, quoting both the opposition's motion and Pertinač's critical perspective. It does not favor one side over the other but provides context and analysis from multiple angles.

Why factuality (85): This article presents the opposition's arguments against Stevanović, including constitutional violations and calls for accountability. It cites legal experts and aligns with other sources on the issue of parliamentary process abuse. The facts are presented consistently across multiple articles.

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat polemic, especially when discussing Stevanović's alleged misuse of power. While not overtly biased, there is an underlying critique of his leadership style.

DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago

The left opposition, composed of MPs from the parties Freedom, SDS, and Left, submitted a motion to dismiss President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović for alleged violations of constitutional order related to his handling of opposition investigative committees concerning Black Cube and surrounding financing of parties. However, the motion was doomed to fail due to lack of sufficient votes, leading some to view it as a theatrical attempt to create extraordinary circumstances. Leaders of the opposition, including Borut Sajović of Freedom and Meir Hot of SDS, criticized Stevanović for lacking legitimacy and accused him of directly violating the constitution by blocking the establishment of investigative committees. Luka Mesec of Left added that Stevanović's actions regarding MP Boris Mijič were misleading, noting that previous President of the National Assembly Urška Klakočar Zupančič had not included similar motions on energy-related issues on the agenda. Anja Bah Žibert of SDS pointed out that this is the 11th such failed attempt in Slovenia’s parliamentary history, emphasizing that the left opposition lacks enough support to succeed.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives from different political factions, including criticism from the opposition against Stevanović and counterarguments from the ruling coalition. It does not favor one side over another but rather outlines the situation and differing viewpoints objectively.

Why factuality (85): The article outlines the opposition's proposed removal of Stevanović, referencing the Mijič affair and constitutional breaches. It includes detailed information on the required vote threshold and the composition of the parliament, consistent with other sources.

Why objectivity (70): While factual, the article implies that the opposition's actions are politically motivated and ultimately futile, introducing a subtle bias in favor of the status quo.

Primorske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 657 days ago

The article discusses the defense provided by Dragan Stevanović, President of the National Assembly of Slovenia, against a proposal for his removal from office. The proposal was initiated by opposition MPs from the parties Freedom, SDS, and Left, who accused him of failing in his duties. In response, Stevanović's cabinet denied these claims, stating that he did not prevent the calling of extraordinary sessions nor reject the inclusion of proposed agenda items. They emphasized that he called both sessions within legal timeframes and allowed all requested topics to be included on the agenda, enabling the National Assembly to make decisions on them. The cabinet argued that the proposal for Stevanović's removal is based on a mistaken assumption regarding his actions and does not demonstrate any constitutional or procedural violations. They highlighted that the president of the National Assembly has no authority to override the decisions of MPs or influence the outcome of voting, and that his role is to ensure the legality of procedures while allowing the assembly to decide collectively. Stevanović himself reiterated this stance, emphasizing that if an investigation into the Black Cube,

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, including both the accusations made by the opposition and the rebuttals from Stevanović's cabinet. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side, providing factual information and quoting both perspectives without overtly favoring one.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the primary source document, covering the opposition’s allegations against Stevanović and the legal arguments surrounding the proposed resolution. It includes specific details about the procedural violations and the constitutional issues raised.

Why objectivity (65): The tone is clearly biased towards the opposition, using strong language to criticize Stevanović’s actions. The article emphasizes the seriousness of the situation from the opposition’s viewpoint, which may not be entirely balanced.