Living in fear: Russian saboteur reveals how they are helping Ukraine in the war against Russia
A Russian defector named Ivan claims he worked with the Ukrainian military intelligence service GUR to prepare attacks using drones against strategic missile silos and ammunition factories in Russia. He describes his role in sabotaging military infrastructure and gathering intelligence for Ukraine. Another individual, Foma, who is now in exile in Poland, leads a network of operatives inside Russia who monitor high-ranking military officers and relay information to GUR. The pair were interviewed by BBC journalist Marcin Mamon for a documentary film. According to Ivan, the sabotage operations involve assembling drone components to create powerful weapons capable of destroying valuable assets. Foma trains remote collaborators in Russia through online platforms and provides them with detailed profiles of targets, including personal data and vehicle information. He emphasizes the importance of understanding enemy systems to identify weaknesses. Foma estimates that between 300 and 500 Russians are working similarly for Ukraine, and his network includes approximately three hundred people across Russia, Ukraine, and other European countries. The GUR reportedly selects which individuals to盯
Russia has rapidly expanded drone launch facilities near the Ukrainian border, according to satellite imagery analysis and defense experts. In the Rostov region, a facility covering 126 football pitches was constructed in just six weeks. This site includes eight launch platforms and could potentially deploy over 100 drones daily, according to DroneSec, a defense research firm. Another site in Orel Oblast, known as Tsymbulova, has grown significantly since 2024, with 23 launchers and around 100 ready-to-deploy drones as of August. These installations are positioned within 200 kilometers of Ukraine. The expansion reflects a broader Russian initiative. According to a Telegraph investigation, at least ten new Russian bases have been equipped with advanced drone launch systems, adding 59 more launch pads near the Ukrainian and Belarusian borders. These developments highlight a shift toward jet-powered drones, which are harder to intercept than traditional propeller models. The Geran-5 model reportedly has a range of 1,000 kilometers and can reach speeds up to 600 km/h, while the Geran-4 can fly at 450 km/h. These capabilities challenge Ukraine's slower interceptor drones. According to the Telegraph, the number of attacks using these drones increased eightfold between June and August, rising from 350 to 2,800. Russia is now producing nearly 3,000 Geran-4 and Geran-5 drones monthly and plans to use jet-powered drones for half its aerial strikes. This escalation has raised concerns among NATO members, who accuse Russia of increasing acts of sabotage, drone incursions, and cyberattacks on their territory. Experts suggest Moscow’s focus on long-range strike capabilities might be compromising conventional ground forces. The speed of these developments indicates a strategic priority for Moscow, according to Rob Jordan of RUSI. Mike Monnik of DroneSec notes that the rapid deployment of offensive capabilities poses a strategic vulnerability for NATO, as many member states lack comprehensive anti-drone defenses. However, concentrating such capabilities in large bases presents risks for Moscow. In late August, Ukraine struck the Tsymbulova site, damaging one launcher and storage area. Analysts warn that Ukraine’s growing cruise missile arsenal could make these installations even more vulnerable. In response, Kyiv is developing jet-powered interceptor drones, including the P1-SUN Jetkiller by SkyFall. The goal is to keep pace with Russia’s technological advancements. However, recent access restrictions to the American Starlink satellite network have hindered Ukraine’s ability to defend against Russian drones, though this issue has since been resolved. Meanwhile, in a separate development, Iran has shown improved accuracy in targeting U.S. military assets, possibly due to Chinese assistance. Satellite images and intelligence data allegedly provided by China have enabled Iran to track movements of U.S. ships and military installations more effectively. This information allowed Iran to conduct more precise attacks, including a July strike on a U.S. base in Jordan that killed three American soldiers. Chinese involvement appears limited to providing technical assistance and satellite imagery, with Russia contributing to improvements in missile and drone guidance systems. While the extent of Chinese government involvement remains unclear, U.S. officials have sanctioned three Chinese satellite companies suspected of supplying data useful for Iranian operations. Concerns remain about low- and medium-altitude systems used by Iran, which are harder to intercept with existing high-altitude defense systems. The U.S. has expressed strong opposition to any form of Chinese support for Iran, while China maintains it adheres to international obligations and opposes exploiting conflicts to target itself.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
In Russia, near the Ukrainian border, multiple drone launch sites are being rapidly constructed, according to satellite imagery analysis by Reuters and confirmed by defense experts. In the Rostov region, a facility covering 126 football fields was built in just six weeks and could soon launch over 100 drones daily. Another site in Orel Oblast, Tsymbulova, expanded quickly since 2024 and now has 23 launchers and hundreds of ready-to-deploy drones aimed at Ukraine. These developments are part of a broader Russian effort to expand drone capabilities, including advanced jet-powered models like the Geran-5 and Geran-4, which are harder to intercept than traditional propeller-driven drones. According to The Telegraph, drone attacks have increased eightfold between June and August, reaching nearly 2,800 strikes. NATO countries express concern over this escalation, noting the strategic vulnerability posed by Russia’s ability to deploy large-scale offensive capabilities quickly.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information based on satellite analysis, expert opinions, and reports from The Telegraph. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content remains neutral in tone, focusing on military developments and their implications for
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the location of the drone launch sites near the Ukrainian border, the size of the facilities (equivalent to 126 football fields), and the estimated daily drone capacity. These claims are supported by references to satellite imagery analysis from Reuters
Why objectivity (75): The article presents information in a largely neutral manner but does include some evaluative language such as 'proliferation at full speed' and 'more sophisticated arsenal,' which imply judgment. It also frames the development as an escalation in the conflict, potentially leaning toward a Western p
Il GiornaleParty-alignedCenterFactual 60Objective 505 days ago
The article discusses how Iran has significantly improved its military capabilities against U.S. targets, particularly through enhanced precision in strikes. This advancement is attributed in part to intelligence and satellite data allegedly provided by Chinese companies, which allowed Iran to track U.S. naval movements more effectively. The article references a July attack on a U.S. base in Jordan, where three American soldiers were killed, suggesting that the Chinese data enabled this level of accuracy. While the U.S. acknowledges the involvement of Chinese entities, it remains unclear whether the Chinese government directly authorized such actions. Additionally, the article notes that Russia has contributed to improving Iran’s missile guidance systems. Analysts warn that these developments pose a growing threat to U.S. military installations across the Middle East.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information based on reports from CNN and U.S. officials, without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It outlines claims made by both Iranian and U.S. perspectives but does not take a clear stance on the validity of those claims or assign blame. The framing appears to
Why factuality (60): The article makes several claims about Chinese assistance to Iran, including the provision of satellite imagery and intelligence data. However, there is no independent verification of these claims, and they rely primarily on CNN’s reporting. The specific example of the July attack on a U.S. base in
Why objectivity (50): The article has a clear bias in favor of the U.S. perspective, using phrases like 'unprecedented precision' and implying that China's support gave Iran capabilities beyond its reach. The tone is highly charged, suggesting a conspiracy involving China and Iran, and it frames the situation as a signif
The war in Ukraine has evolved into a technological battle, offering advantages and risks for Ukrainian defenders. In the eastern part of the country, near the front line, members of the elite Ukrainian unit 'Ptachi Madjara' prepare their medium-range drones for launch. These drones, equipped with high-performance cameras and Starlink terminals for satellite internet connectivity, can fly up to 300 kilometers and carry a 10-kilogram explosive payload. They are remotely controlled by pilots located elsewhere in Ukraine, targeting Russian military assets such as air defense systems, mobile artillery cannons, and military trucks. The use of these advanced technologies has significantly weakened Russian logistics in the rear areas, limiting their ability to conduct major offensives. This innovation has been crucial in helping Ukraine resist ongoing aggression.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of Ukrainian military operations using drone technology against Russian forces. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The focus is on describing the technological aspects of the conflict and their impact on the war,
A Russian defector named Ivan claims he worked with the Ukrainian military intelligence service GUR to prepare attacks using drones against strategic missile silos and ammunition factories in Russia. He describes his role in sabotaging military infrastructure and gathering intelligence for Ukraine. Another individual, Foma, who is now in exile in Poland, leads a network of operatives inside Russia who monitor high-ranking military officers and relay information to GUR. The pair were interviewed by BBC journalist Marcin Mamon for a documentary film. According to Ivan, the sabotage operations involve assembling drone components to create powerful weapons capable of destroying valuable assets. Foma trains remote collaborators in Russia through online platforms and provides them with detailed profiles of targets, including personal data and vehicle information. He emphasizes the importance of understanding enemy systems to identify weaknesses. Foma estimates that between 300 and 500 Russians are working similarly for Ukraine, and his network includes approximately three hundred people across Russia, Ukraine, and other European countries. The GUR reportedly selects which individuals to盯
Bias read (Center): The article presents interviews with two individuals claiming to work for Ukrainian intelligence, describing their activities in Russia. It does not take a clear stance on the validity of their claims or the broader geopolitical implications, but rather reports their statements objectively. There is
A BBC World Service documentary explores the activities of two Russian men allegedly working for Ukraine's military intelligence service, GUR. These individuals, referred to as Ivan and Foma, claim involvement in covert operations targeting Russian military infrastructure and personnel. Ivan reportedly participated in drone attacks against strategic bombers and munitions factories within Russia, while Foma oversees a network of undercover volunteers gathering intelligence on high-ranking Russian officials. The GUR has confirmed their employment but acknowledges uncertainty about the full scope of their activities. Both men emphasize their opposition to President Vladimir Putin’s regime and suggest their efforts aim to hasten its downfall if Russia loses the war. While Ukraine has acknowledged using secret agents for such operations, it typically does not publicly claim responsibility for specific attacks.
Bias read (Center): The article presents accounts from individuals claiming to operate under Ukraine's military intelligence, detailing alleged sabotage activities within Russia. It includes perspectives from both the operatives and Ukrainian authorities, acknowledging the existence of such operations without taking a側
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
