The 2026 World Cup will be remembered for what?

Željko Vela, a well-known commentator for Croatian public broadcaster HRT, has revealed what he will remember most about the 2026 World Cup. In a recent episode of the Ofenziva podcast, Vela reflected on his experiences covering the tournament, emphasizing aspects beyond the actual matches played on the field. His reflections centered around the excessive use of video assistant referee (VAR) technology and its impact on the game. Vela criticized the over-reliance on VAR, stating that decisions were being made based on minute details that had little relevance to the flow of play. He described situations where referees reviewed footage of contact that did not affect the outcome of plays, such as hair touching or a player's head brushing against another’s shoulder. These instances, according to Vela, led to unnecessary interruptions and undermined the natural rhythm of the game. He provided a specific example during Croatia’s match against Portugal, where a chip detected a touch that had no effect on the ball’s movement. Vela questioned the necessity of such technology in these scenarios, suggesting that it was more useful in cases where a foul or offside needed clarification. However, he argued that in many instances, the technology was used unnecessarily, leading to confusion among players and fans alike. The Croatian team’s early exit from the tournament after losing to Portugal added to the overall disappointment felt by many supporters. This loss, combined with other similar outcomes, left a bitter taste for fans and commentators alike. Vela noted that while there were moments of excitement and memorable performances throughout the tournament, the overall experience was marred by the controversies surrounding VAR decisions. The use of VAR has been a topic of debate in international football for several years. While it was introduced to reduce human error and ensure fair play, critics argue that it has altered the nature of the game. Vela’s comments reflect a growing concern among pundits and fans about how the technology is being applied in high-stakes matches. Some believe that the system needs refinement to prevent it from becoming a tool for over-analysis rather than a means of correcting clear mistakes. Despite the criticisms, the 2026 World Cup featured numerous standout moments both on and off the pitch. The tournament brought together some of the world’s best players, creating unforgettable spectacles for fans around the globe. However, for Vela, the lingering memory will be the excessive reliance on technology that disrupted the spontaneity and emotional intensity of the sport. As discussions continue about the role of VAR in modern football, Vela’s insights offer a perspective from someone deeply embedded in the coverage of major tournaments. His critique highlights the need for balance between technological advancement and preserving the essence of the beautiful game. The upcoming World Cup cycles may see further developments in how VAR is implemented, potentially addressing concerns raised by commentators like Vela.