In a recent address during the celebrations marking the 30th anniversary of Ukraine's constitution, President Volodymyr Zelensky declared that no one would dictate to Ukrainians whom they should honor. This statement came amid growing tensions between Ukraine and Poland over historical narratives and national identity. The declaration was part of a broader initiative aimed at establishing a Ukrainian National Pantheon, which seeks to immortalize individuals who have contributed significantly to the nation’s independence, security, and development.
The proposed law outlines six categories under which individuals could be enshrined in the pantheon. These include presidents, high-ranking military officials, individuals who played a crucial role in securing or restoring Ukraine’s sovereignty, contributors to the country’s development, Nobel Prize laureates, and others deemed worthy of recognition. Conversely, the law also specifies categories that would exclude certain individuals, such as those convicted of crimes against national security and peace.
Zelensky emphasized that the names of all heroes who fought for Ukraine throughout history would be etched into the nation’s memory with great respect and attention. He stressed that Ukraine values its self-respect, its people, and its right to be Ukrainian. “No one will ever tell us how to live, speak, love, be grateful, or which heroes we must honor,” he stated. His remarks were echoed by Kyryl Budanov, head of the presidential administration, who similarly asserted that no one would dictate to Ukrainians which heroes to revere or which holidays to celebrate.
This initiative comes in response to a recent conflict with Poland, where President Andrzej Duda revoked Zelensky’s highest Polish state award, the Order of the White Eagle, due to disputes over Ukraine’s references to nationalist figures. The controversy escalated when Zelensky signed a decree granting a unit of Ukrainian special forces the honorary title "Heroes of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA)." The UPA, active during World War II, fought both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union but is also known for brutal actions against civilians in Western Ukraine, including thousands of Poles, Jews, and Czechs from Volhynia.
Zelensky’s decision to name the unit after the UPA sparked significant backlash in Poland, leading to the revocation of his award. In response, Zelensky returned the medal via courier service, initiating a wave of reciprocal returns of honors and medals between the two countries. The tension further affected international events, such as the conference on Ukraine’s recovery in Gdansk, where Zelensky and Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha did not attend, with Prime Minister Yulia Szydło representing Kyiv instead.
Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski criticized Zelensky’s choice of naming the unit after the UPA, suggesting that the president should have been more mindful of the historical implications. While acknowledging the UPA’s resistance against Soviet occupation, Sikorski pointed out the group’s responsibility for the deaths of many Poles. He also criticized Duda’s decision to revoke Zelensky’s award, calling it disproportionate and personally humiliating for the Ukrainian leader. Sikorski argued that this move unnecessarily closed the door to dialogue with a country fighting Russian aggression.
The current crisis highlights divergent views between Ukraine and Poland regarding the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA). In Ukraine, these groups are often seen as symbols of the struggle for independence from the Soviet Union, while in Poland, they are primarily associated with the Volhynian massacres of 1943-1944. Analysts suggest that this dispute has reopened historical wounds that had temporarily been overshadowed by the close alliance formed in response to Russia’s invasion.
Beyond the pantheon initiative, Zelensky announced the creation of a new state honor, the Order of Europe, intended to recognize Ukrainian soldiers and foreign allies who contribute to European security and support Ukraine’s path toward EU integration. This move underscores Ukraine’s commitment to aligning itself more closely with European institutions while asserting its unique historical narrative and national identity. As tensions continue to simmer, the future of bilateral relations between Ukraine and Poland remains uncertain, with both sides navigating complex historical legacies and contemporary geopolitical realities.
3 reports
Seznam ZprávyIndependentLeftyesterday Zelenskyj zmírnil tón, ale Poláci už se na Ukrajince dívají jinakThe article discusses the ongoing tension between Poland and Ukraine, focusing on historical disputes over the recognition of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA). President Volodymyr Zelenskyj recently softened his stance after initially criticizing Polish views on the UPA, which is seen in Ukraine as a symbol of independence but associated with massacres of Poles in Poland. The conflict escalated when Zelenskyj awarded a unit of Ukrainian special forces the title 'Hrdinové UPA,' prompting retaliatory actions by Polish President Karol Kozłowski, including revoking an honor. The situation has deepened with Ukraine’s parliament approving a law establishing a national pantheon, potentially including high-ranking UPA figures. This move is viewed in Poland as part of a broader effort to reshape historical narratives. Meanwhile, a recent poll by the IBRiS agency indicates that many Poles have a negative view of Ukrainians, suggesting the dispute extends beyond political leaders into public perception.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the issue through the lens of Ukraine's efforts to assert historical narratives, particularly regarding the UPA, while highlighting Polish concerns over historical accountability. It emphasizes the shift in Zelenskyj's tone and the potential inclusion of controversial figures in a
Novinky.czIndependentLeft4 days ago No one will dictate to us whom we should worship, Zelensky saidThe article discusses Ukraine's new law defining categories of individuals who can be recognized as national heroes and those who cannot. The law includes figures such as presidents, military leaders, and Nobel Prize winners, while excluding those convicted of crimes against national security and peace. President Zelenskyj emphasized that Ukraine will determine its own historical narrative and values, rejecting external influence over what citizens should respect or honor. The legislation follows a recent diplomatic incident with Poland, where Polish President Karol Nawrocki revoked an honorary title from Zelenskyj due to disputes over historical narratives. Zelenskyj also sparked controversy by awarding a special honor to the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), a group historically associated with wartime atrocities against Poles and other minorities.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the legislation as a defense of Ukrainian sovereignty and historical agency, emphasizing Zelenskyj’s rejection of foreign interference. It highlights the controversial recognition of the UPA, which has been criticized internationally for its wartime actions, but presents this as a
Seznam ZprávyIndependentLeft5 days ago Zelenskyj po sporu s Polskem: Nikdo nám nebude říkat, jaké hrdiny máme ctítPresident Volodymyr Zelenskyj vyslovil tvrzení, že nikdo nemá právo určovat, koho Ukrajina musí ctít, během oslav 30. výročí ukrajinské ústavy. Současně předložil návrh zákona o Ukrajinském národním panteonu, který by měl zaznamenat jména hrdinů, kteří bojovali za Ukrajinu. Toto prohlášení v Polsku získalo politický význam, protože bylo interpretováno jako reakce na spor mezi Kyjevem a Varšavou ohledně pojmenování jednotky ukrajinských speciálních sil jako „Hrdinové Ukrajinské povstalecké armády (UPA)“. UPA byla v roce 1940–1945 odpovědná za vraždy civilních obyvatel na Volyni, včetně Poláků a Čechů. Tento incident zhoršil vztahy mezi oběma zeměmi, což se projevilo v tom, že polský prezident Karol Nawrocki odebral Zelenskému nejvyšší polské vyznamenání, zatímco Ukrajina vyznamenání vrátila. Napětí se projevilo i na konferenci o obnově Ukrajiny v Gdańsku, kde Zelenskyj a jeho ministr zahraničních věcí nebyli přítomen, místo nich zastupovala premiérka. Polský ministr zahraničních věcí Radosław Sikorski kritizoval reakci prezidenta a zdůraznil potřebu dialogu.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the conflict between Ukraine and Poland around the controversial historical figure of the UPA, which is viewed differently in both countries. While the article presents the Ukrainian perspective that UPA was fighting against Soviet occupation, it highlights the Polish concern over
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter