Thousands of protesters gathered in Kyiv on Friday afternoon to oppose the dismissal of Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, a move ordered by President Volodomyr Zelenski as part of a broader government restructuring that has sparked widespread controversy. The demonstrations, which marked the second consecutive day of protests, saw participants waving Ukrainian flags and holding signs demanding the return of Fedorov. One banner read “Bring back Fedorov!” while another called for “respecting and considering the people.” The unrest follows a week of political turmoil triggered by Zelenski’s decision to replace Fedorov, a popular figure known for his role in modernizing Ukraine’s military through technological advancements. The new Prime Minister, Serhiy Korytskyi, announced the appointment of former Foreign Affairs Minister Andriy Bohdan as the acting head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Additionally, Korytskyi named the current head of long-range attacks within the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), who will serve as acting Defense Minister. These changes were approved by Parliament the previous evening, following Korytskyi’s successful candidacy vote earlier in the week. This government reshuffle, carried out less than a year after the last major executive overhaul, has caused significant backlash, particularly due to the removal of Fedorov, a young politician widely credited with improving Ukraine’s military position during the war this year. Fedorov claimed his dismissal was due to incompatibility with Chief of Staff Oleksandr Sirskyi, whom Zelenski has supported. Fedorov accused Sirskyi of being authoritarian and outdated. Meanwhile, Zelenski also announced the appointment of former Interior Minister Igor Klimenko as the new head of the National Security Council of Ukraine, replacing Rustem Umakov. These moves have intensified public discontent, with many viewing them as politically motivated rather than strategically sound. In response to mounting pressure, Zelenski replaced Sirskyi, the veteran commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, with Mykhailo Drapatyi, a reformist general currently leading the Joint Forces. Drapatyi, aged 42, belongs to a generation of officers whose careers developed during the conflict with Russia and had been among the top candidates for the post. His appointment aims to address one of the main demands of the protesters, yet it leaves unresolved questions regarding the future of military reforms. Despite Zelenski’s assurances that he and Drapatyi, along with Defense Minister in charge Yevhen Khmara and Deputy Presidential Advisor Pavlo Palisa, have outlined plans for restructuring the General Staff, the situation remains volatile. Drapatyi’s leadership marks the most significant change in the military structure since late 2024, when Sirskyi took over from the previously popular Valeriy Zaluzhny. While the move alters the tone of the crisis, it does not guarantee its resolution. Demonstrations are set to resume in Kyiv and other cities, with protesters continuing to call for Fedorov’s reinstatement. Zelenski, seeking to balance accusations of inflexibility, must avoid appearing too soft, even as Fedorov’s popularity has surged recently, surpassing Zelenski’s own. At the heart of this dispute lies a fundamental clash between two approaches to warfare: one emphasizing technology and data-driven strategies, represented by Fedorov, and the other rooted in traditional values and experience, embodied by Sirskyi. Fedorov advocates for the integration of algorithms and efficiency, while Sirskyi upholds the virtues of bravery and sacrifice. This ideological divide reflects deeper tensions within the military and civilian sectors, shaped by experiences from the early days of the war, when resistance seemed improbable, to more recent operations involving complex tactics such as drone strikes and electronic warfare. Both leaders, despite their differences, have found themselves sidelined, with Zelenski attempting to navigate these competing interests while maintaining stability.
4 reports
El MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 785 days agoThousands of people protested in Kyiv on Friday against the dismissal of Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov by President Volodymyr Zelensky as part of a government restructuring that has sparked controversy. The protests, which took place for the second consecutive day, saw demonstrators carrying national flags and banners demanding the return of Fedorov and calling for respect for the people. Meanwhile, newly appointed Prime Minister Serhiy Kryvytsky announced the appointment of former Foreign Affairs Minister as acting foreign minister and the former head of long-range attacks at the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) as acting defense minister. This reshuffle, decided by Zelensky less than a year after the previous major cabinet overhaul, has caused significant political backlash, particularly over the removal of Fedorov, who was seen as instrumental in modernizing the Ukrainian military. Fedorov claimed his departure was due to incompatibility with Army Chief Oleksandr Sirsky, whom Zelensky supported, accusing Sirsky of being authoritarian and outdated.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the political conflict: the public opposition to Fedorov’s dismissal and the government’s rationale for the restructuring. It includes quotes from Fedorov and mentions Zelensky’s support for Sirsky, but does not overtly favor one side over the other. The framing is
Why factuality (85): The article reports on protests in Kyiv against the dismissal of Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov by President Zelensky as part of a government restructuring. It mentions the new prime minister, Serhiy Kryvytsky, appointing former Foreign Affairs minister and SBU long-range attack specialist as def
Why objectivity (78): The article presents the events neutrally but includes emotionally charged phrases such as 'popular ministro de Defensa' and 'gran polémica', which suggest some level of editorial influence. The focus on public sentiment and the controversy around the government restructuring implies a somewhat bias
El MundoIndependent🔒Center5 hr. ago From heroism to algorithms: Zelenski replaces veteran army chief with a reformist to try to close his biggest internal crisisThe Ukrainian president, Volodimir Zelenski, has replaced the veteran commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, Oleksandr Syrskyi, with Mykhailo Drapatyi, a reformist general, in an attempt to address internal political and military crises. This move follows the dismissal of Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, which sparked significant protests. While Zelenski aims to balance political pressures by appointing a younger, reform-oriented leader, he has not reinstated Fedorov, leaving uncertainties about ongoing military reforms. The change marks a major shift in Ukraine’s military leadership since 2024 but does not resolve the underlying tensions, as protests continue demanding Fedorov’s return.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives of the political conflict: the reformist approach of Drapatyi and the traditional values upheld by Syrskyi, while also highlighting the political maneuvering around Fedorov’s removal. It avoids overtly favoring one side over the other, though it acknowledges Zl
El PaísIndependent🔒Center7 hr. agoThe article reports that street pressure in Ukraine has once again led to political changes, this time resulting in President Volodímir Zelenski making a move during the country's most significant political and military crisis in over four and a half years. The new head of the army, Mijailo Drapaty, who has been leading the Ground Forces since late 2024, is seen as close to the ousted Defense Minister Mijailo Fedorov, whose departure triggered widespread discontent. This follows the second major executive reform of the year and the fourth since 2022.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the political developments in Ukraine as a result of internal pressures and reforms, without overtly favoring any particular political faction. It provides information on the leadership changes and their implications without taking a clear ideological stance, thus maintaining a
El MundoIndependent🔒Centeryesterday Zelenski sacrifices the head of the army to try to close the biggest internal crisis of the warThe Ukrainian president, Volodimir Zelenski, has removed the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, Oleksandr Syrskyi, and appointed General Mykhailo Drapatyi as his successor. This decision follows the dismissal of Defense Minister Mijailo Fedorov, which sparked significant protests in Ukraine since the start of the Russian invasion. Zelenski emphasized that Syrskyi had achieved important military successes, but protesters accused him of blocking reforms and maintaining a centralized command structure unsuitable for modern warfare. The appointment of Drapatyi, who has experience in frontline operations, aims to address demands for more adaptable leadership. However, the crisis remains unresolved, as protesters continue to call for Fedorov's reinstatement and broader military reforms.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the event as a political development without overtly favoring any side. It provides balanced information about both the removal of Syrskyi and the ongoing demands for Fedorov's return. While it highlights the controversy surrounding the changes, it does not take a clear stance,報
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Spain
