ON
← Back to feed
Silencing the POP TV, the target is the Telemach?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9/3/2026

Silencing the POP TV, the target is the Telemach?

The article discusses recent rumors about the potential sale of POP TV, Slovenia's largest commercial television station, owned by the Czech multinational PPF Group through its Amsterdam-based subsidiary CME Enterprises. The piece references statements made by Janez Janša, leader of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), who criticized POP TV's content via social media platform X earlier this year. He accused the channel of 'extremely leftist reporting' by its correspondent in the US, 'anti-Semitic portrayal of situations in the Middle East,' and 'extremely leftist commentators during election debates.' Janša also claimed that POP TV receives significant public funding through companies like Telekom and Gen-I and vowed to end this. The article suggests that the reported interest in buying POP TV by businessman Dari Južna and other local firms might be part of a broader effort to 'discipline' the channel rather than a genuine acquisition. It also notes that Janša has had a long-standing history of criticizing POP TV, dating back to the 1990s when it was founded by one of Donald Trump’s closest friends, Ronald Lauder.

Unconfirmed reports suggest that representatives of the Czech-owned media group POP TV are seeking a private meeting with Slovenia’s new Prime Minister, Janez Janša. The potential encounter has sparked speculation about the strategic moves within one of the country's most influential commercial television networks. According to multiple sources close to parliamentary circles, these discussions appear to center around personnel changes and future leadership roles at POP TV, which is currently undergoing a period of transition following political shifts in the nation. The interest from POP TV’s management stems from its complex ownership structure. The Slovenian publisher Pro Plus, which operates POP TV, is part of the Central European Media Enterprises (CME). CME itself is owned by the Prague-based investment firm PPF Group. This intricate chain of ownership suggests that decisions regarding POP TV’s direction could involve high-level considerations beyond just local politics. Reports indicate that talks have been ongoing between representatives of the foreign owners and key figures in the government, particularly focusing on how the new administration might influence the network’s editorial policies and leadership appointments. Sources indicate that the push for a direct dialogue with Janša comes amid uncertainty over the future of POP TV’s top positions. With the political landscape shifting, there is growing interest among international stakeholders in ensuring that their interests are aligned with the evolving media environment in Slovenia. The potential meeting would allow both sides to explore possible synergies and address concerns related to content strategy, governance, and long-term vision for the network. The situation has drawn attention to the broader implications of media ownership in Slovenia. As one of the largest commercial broadcasters, POP TV holds considerable sway over public discourse and information dissemination. Its alignment with different political forces can significantly impact national narratives. The current discussions reflect a desire to secure stability and clarity in the network’s operations during this transitional phase. Meanwhile, the involvement of President Nataša Pirc Musar adds another layer of complexity to the unfolding scenario. Her office has reportedly engaged with representatives of POP TV’s owners in recent weeks, raising questions about the nature of their communications. While specific details remain undisclosed, the renewed focus on this relationship underscores the significance of media dynamics in shaping political strategies and vice versa. As the situation develops, all eyes will be on whether Janša agrees to meet with POP TV’s representatives. If such a meeting takes place, it could mark a pivotal moment in determining the trajectory of Slovenia’s leading commercial television station. The outcome may influence not only the immediate decisions at POP TV but also set precedents for how foreign media interests interact with domestic political structures in the region.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

Mladina logoMladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 609/3/2026
Silencing the POP TV, the target is the Telemach?

The article discusses recent rumors about the potential sale of POP TV, Slovenia's largest commercial television station, owned by the Czech multinational PPF Group through its Amsterdam-based subsidiary CME Enterprises. The piece references statements made by Janez Janša, leader of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), who criticized POP TV's content via social media platform X earlier this year. He accused the channel of 'extremely leftist reporting' by its correspondent in the US, 'anti-Semitic portrayal of situations in the Middle East,' and 'extremely leftist commentators during election debates.' Janša also claimed that POP TV receives significant public funding through companies like Telekom and Gen-I and vowed to end this. The article suggests that the reported interest in buying POP TV by businessman Dari Južna and other local firms might be part of a broader effort to 'discipline' the channel rather than a genuine acquisition. It also notes that Janša has had a long-standing history of criticizing POP TV, dating back to the 1990s when it was founded by one of Donald Trump’s closest friends, Ronald Lauder.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Janša's criticisms of POP TV as politically motivated, suggesting they are part of a broader strategy to control or discipline the media landscape. The language used implies skepticism toward Janša's claims and highlights his historical ties to conservative figures, which could be

Why factuality (75): The article reports on claims made by Janez Janša through social media platform X regarding content moderation at POP TV, citing specific allegations such as 'extreme left-wing reporting' and 'anti-Semitic portrayal of Middle East relations'. These claims are presented without direct evidence or sou

Why objectivity (60): The tone leans towards supporting the narrative that there may be political pressure on POP TV, particularly through references to Janša's public statements. While not overtly partisan, the framing suggests a possible alignment with the governing coalition's perspective, which slightly reduces objec

Info360 logoInfo360IndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 608/31/2026
Is the richest man in Slovenia interested in POP TV?

The article discusses potential changes in ownership of POP TV, Slovenia's leading commercial television channel, which could significantly impact its influence over the electoral body and political landscape. The current owner's shift in control has raised interest among business circles, with Dario Južna, Slovenia's richest person, reportedly entering into negotiations to acquire Pro Plus, the parent company of POP TV. This move would further consolidate his influence across various sectors including media, construction, energy, and telecommunications. The transaction is estimated to be worth between 120 to 150 million euros. The article highlights the financial significance of POP TV, noting that it generates around 40 million euros annually from advertising revenue, compared to RTV Slovenija, the state broadcaster, which receives nearly four times less. It also outlines the distribution of ad revenue in Slovenia, where television channels take 37%, radio 13%, and print media just 4%. Digital and external advertising make up the remainder.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the potential acquisition of POP TV by Dario Južna as a significant development that enhances his political influence, suggesting a broader consolidation of power within media and business sectors. While it presents factual information about the financial implications and market地位

Why factuality (75): The article reports on potential ownership changes at POP TV and mentions Dario Južna as a possible new owner based on sources from business circles. It cites estimates of his wealth and transaction values, but does not provide direct confirmation from official statements or primary documents. The i

Why objectivity (60): The tone leans towards suggesting Južna's involvement without clear evidence, using phrases like 'trdijo' (say) and 'po govoricah' (according to rumors). The article presents the possibility as a significant development but lacks neutrality in emphasizing the implications for media influence.

Zanima.me logoZanima.meIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 608/29/2026
Why do the foreign owners of POP TV want a one-on-one meeting with Jan Janša?

The article discusses behind-the-scenes developments involving foreign owners of Slovenia's largest commercial television station, POP TV, seeking direct meetings with Prime Minister Janez Janša. It highlights the strategic interest of the Czech-based PPF Group, which owns the media group CME through its Slovenian subsidiary Pro Plus. The focus is on potential personnel changes within POP TV and the broader implications for the country’s most influential news programming. The article connects these developments to ongoing political shifts and mentions exclusive insights into the relationship between President Nataša Pirc Musar and the media owners.

Bias read (Center): While the article covers politically sensitive topics such as media ownership and influence, it presents information from multiple sources and does not exhibit clear ideological leaning. The framing remains balanced, focusing on factual reporting rather than overtly promoting a particular political,

Why factuality (75): The article reports on insider information from parliamentary sources regarding discussions between foreign owners of POP TV and the new prime minister, Janez Janša. It references the media group structure (CME, PPF Group) and connects these discussions to potential staffing changes at POP TV. While

Why objectivity (60): The tone leans towards a narrative that suggests urgency and significance around the meetings with Janša, implying a strategic importance not clearly justified by the content. The article frames the situation as a 'battle' for leadership, which may introduce bias. The focus on 'presurprising backgro

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories