The Zadar Archdiocese has taken disciplinary action against Father Josip Radić, who is being prosecuted for failing to report a criminal offense against a 23-year-old woman. The archbishop has banned Radić from participating publicly in religious services and initiated an ex-criminal canonical procedure to determine his status under canon law. This follows the trial of another priest, Josip Glasnović, who is accused of multiple sexual abuses and threats against the same victim. The case emerged after the prosecution revealed that Radić had been informed of Glasnović’s misconduct but allegedly advised the victim to seek spiritual refuge rather than report the abuse. Glasnović, married to the founder of the religious community Omnia Deo, faces 12 charges, while Radić is charged with failure to report the crime. The court session was closed to the public until after the indictment was read.
Bias read (Center): While the issue involves a sensitive matter of clergy misconduct and legal accountability, the article presents the actions of the archbishop and the judicial process in a factual manner without overt ideological slant. It reports on the legal procedures and institutional responses without promoting
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the actions taken by the Zagreb Archdiocese against Don Josip Radić, including the ban from public participation in services and an ecclesiastical criminal proceeding. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the legal proceedings against both Radić and Glasnović. T
Why objectivity (75): The tone remains formal and informative, but there is some emphasis on the moral implications of the actions taken by the archbishop, such as protecting the Church and preventing possible corruption. While not overtly biased, the language carries a degree of judgment.




