Napad na 70-letnega kmeta iz Kleča, ki je zadevno zasegao dva brata – Aleksandra in Primoža Strojana, je v nedeljo, 16. septembra, končno vodil do sodne obsade. Okrožno sodišče v Ljubljani je obsojila obeh obtoženih na po dve leti zapora. Decembrska sodna preseda je bila rezultat dolgega pravnega postopka, ki je vključeval raziskave, dokumentacijo in spremembe v obtožbah. Sodnica Ana Babnik je v svojem obrazložitvi sodbe poudarila, da je napad bil storjen brez povoda in da je bil izveden iz gole objestnosti. Po njej je bilo jasno, da je oškodovanec – 70-letni kmet Anton Čemažar – bil zelo občutljiv na poškodbe, kar je dodatno povečalo težino dejanja.
Dogodek je zgodil postal 8. julija lani, ko je kmet Anton Čemažar na svoji njivi preverjal stanje krompirja po suši. Med tem je opazil, da se mu približuje avtomobil brez registrskih tablic. Trije muškarci so se iz avtomobila iztrudili in ga nato napali. Najprej je en od napadalcov, Aleksander Strojan, zabil kmeta v glavo, kar je pripeljalo kpadcu na tla. Nato je Aleksander še dvakrat udaril v obraz, medtem ko drugi napadalec, Primož Strojan, ga je poškropil s solzivcem. Tretji napadalec, Stanka Železnik, je po kmetu padale še brce v zadnjico in hrbet. Kmet je utrpel zlom dna leve očesne votline in leve ličnice, poškodovala sta mu tudi čeljust. Kljub hudim poškodbam je Čemažar uspel sam odpeljati domov, kjer je bil potolčen, okrvavljen in zaslepljen.
Sodnica je v svojem obrazložitvi sodbe poudarila, da je napad storjen brez povoda, čeprav je bil kmet v nekaterih primerih znotraj svoje lastnine. "Napadla sta ga brez povoda, pa tudi če bi obstajal, za takšno nasilje ni opravičila," je dejala. Sodnica je tudi poudarila, da je oškodovanec bil od vaju šibkejši in starejši, kar je povečalo tveganje za poškodbe. Združeno z izpostavljenostjo kmetu, je sodnica ocenila, da je bilo dejanje agresivno in brezbrižno. Olajševalnih okoliščin, kot so možnost, da bi bilo kdo od obtoženih pod vplivom psihoaktivnih snovi, ni našla. Sodnica je tudi poudarila, da ni bilo dokazov za uporabo solzivca proti kmetu, kar je zanikal tudi Primož Strojan.
Obtoženci so bili znotraj pravnega procesa zelo aktivni. Primož Strojan je vseskozi zanikal, da bi oškodovanca poškropil s solzivcem, kar je potrdil tudi njegov zagovornik, Andrej Žabjek. Odvetnica Lea Krstić, ki je zastopala Aleksandra Strojana, je poudarila, da se je Aleksander sam predal policistom in priznal, da je kmeta večkrat udaril v obraz. Dveletna kazen, ki jo je predlagala tožilka Ana Kirm, je bila za Aleksandra Strojana previsoka, zato je podvomila o oceni psihiatričnega izvedenca Petra Preglja, da je bil obtoženi v času kaznivega dejanja nebistveno zmanjšano prišteven. Aleksander Strojan je namreč trdil, da je bil pod vplivom heroina, sanvala in alkohola.
Sodnica je v svojem obrazložitvi sodbe poudarila, da je bilo dejanje storjeno iz gole objestnosti in da ni bilo nobenih olajševalnih okoliščin. Obtožena sta bila s sodbo nezadovoljna, zato je pričakovati pritožbo. Oškodovanec, Anton Čemažar, je obsojenima segel v roke in ju pozval k pameti. Sodnica je preklicala pogojno obsodbo Aleksandra Strojana, s katero je bil zaradi tatvine obsojen na štiri mesece zapora. V končno kazen pa je vštela tudi v preteklosti izrečeno kazen zaradi kaznivega dejanja poškodovanja tuje stvari. Aleksander Strojan bo v zaporu dve leti in pet mesecev. Sodnica je podaljšala pripor zaradi ponovitvene nevarnosti.
V nadaljevanju bo treba spremljati pritožbo obtoženih, kjer bodo mogli predložiti novi argumenti ali dokaze. Tudi tožilstvo bo moralo predstaviti svoje stališče glede pritožbe, kar lahko vključuje predlog za spremembo kaze. Vendar pa je sodnica že določila, da je bilo dejanje zelo težko in da ni bilo nobenih olajševalnih okoliščin. Zato je verjetno, da bo sodnica odradila pritožbo. Vseeno bo treba spremljati razvoj primera, ker je zadeva zelo pomembna za družinske in pravne vztike v regiji.
5 reports
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 96Objective 8815 days agoA court in Ljubljana has sentenced Aleksander and Primož Strojan to two years in prison for attacking a farmer from Kleč in July of last year. The attack occurred on the farmer's field near Ljubljana, where the brothers allegedly beat him with fists and sprayed him with pepper spray. The victim suffered serious injuries including fractures to his eye socket and cheekbone, as well as jaw damage. The prosecution initially also pursued charges against Stanko Železnik but dropped them after an investigation. The judge stated the attack was unprovoked and unjustified, noting the victim's age and脆弱性
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal trial without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the judge and mentions the defense's stance, providing balanced information.
Why these scores (Factual 96 · Objective 88): This article provides a clear summary of the case, citing Dnevnik and including direct quotes from the judge. The facts align closely with the primary source, though it briefly emphasizes the severity of the crime without significant bias.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8615 days agoAleksander in Primož Strojan sta bila obsodita na po dve leti zapora zaradi julijskega napada na 70-letnega kmeta iz Kleč. Sodnica je poudarila, da je nasilje brez povoda in da ni opravičila. Tožilstvo je prvotno preganjalo tretjega moža, Stanka Železnika, vendar je obtožbo umaknilo po dokaznem postopku.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a criminal case with no explicit political content or framing. It presents facts from court proceedings without overtly favoring any side, using neutral language and quoting judicial statements directly.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 86): The article accurately conveys the legal outcome and includes key details from the trial. It cites Dnevnik and includes the judge's statement, maintaining a mostly neutral tone while still highlighting the gravity of the crime.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8515 days agoA court sentenced two men for severely injuring a 70-year-old farmer in Kleč. According to the online newspaper Dnevnik, Aleksander Strojan allegedly hit the farmer in the head, causing him to fall, then struck him twice in the face. His brother, Primož Strojan, reportedly sprayed the victim with pepper spray before throwing stones at his back and buttocks. The farmer suffered fractures to his left eye socket and cheekbone, as well as jaw injuries. Initially, the prosecution also pursued charges against Stanko Železnik, but dropped them after the investigation. The court dismissed the case. In
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts from multiple sources including the court, the prosecution, defense attorneys, and the online publication Dnevnik. It includes direct quotes from the judge, the defense attorney, and the prosecution, without apparent bias toward either side. The framing remains neutral, as
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports the court ruling, citing Dnevnik as a source. It includes details from the trial such as the charges, the victim's injuries, and statements from the judge and defense. However, it leans slightly toward the prosecution's narrative by emphasizing the lack of justificatio
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8515 days agoTwo brothers, Aleksander and Primož Strojan, were sentenced to two years in prison for brutally beating Anton Čemažar, a 72-year-old farmer, on his land in Ljubljana last July. The third accused, Stanko Železnik, was acquitted due to lack of evidence. The attack left Čemažar with permanent facial injuries.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal trial without overtly favoring any side. It includes details from court proceedings and quotes from the victim, but does not include commentary or biased language. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal outcome rather than taking a立场.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides detailed information about the trial and the incident, aligning closely with the cross-source consensus. It includes specific names, dates, and details of the attack. The tone is generally neutral but uses some emotionally charged terms like 'brutalno pretepla' which slightly af
Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 94Objective 8215 days agoTwo Roma brothers, Primož and Aleksander Strojan, were sentenced to two years in prison by District Court Judge Ana Babnik for their involvement in a violent attack on 72-year-old farmer Anton Čemažar last July in Ljubljana's Kleče. The attack involved beating Čemažar with blows to his head and spraying him with pepper spray. He suffered severe injuries but managed to drive himself home after the incident. A third individual, Boštjan Brajdič, who allegedly brought the perpetrators to the scene, was dropped from the case due to insufficient evidence.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal trial without overtly favoring any side. It describes the events objectively, citing court decisions and details of the crime without apparent ideological framing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 82): The article accurately summarizes the court decision and includes relevant details from the incident. It mentions the victim's name and some specific actions during the attack but presents the information in a somewhat emotionally charged manner when describing the assault.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
