Youth protests: Noida woman booked for allegedly objectionable social media video about PM Modi
A 25-year-old woman from Noida, Ruchika Singh, has been booked by police for allegedly posting a social media video containing objectionable remarks about Prime Minister Narendra Modi during youth protests at Jantar Mantar. The FIR was registered under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to intentional insult, public mischief, and defamation. The complaint was made by Smriti Singh, a Ghaziabad resident, who alleged that the video undermined the dignity of the constitutional office and aimed to spread hatred and disrupt public peace. The police have also sent notices to social media platforms like X, requesting removal of derogatory content targeting constitutional heads and seeking detailed information about the accounts involved. Political figures, including Saurav Das of the Cockroach Janta Party and Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi, have criticized the use of criminal justice against protesters, urging caution in the use of objectionable language and condemning potential misuse of power.
Noida Police have registered a zero FIR against a 25-year-old woman for allegedly using objectionable language against Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the recent CJP protest at Jantar Mantar in Delhi. The complaint was filed by Supreme Court advocate Smriti Singh, who claims to have received multiple videos purportedly showing the accused making abusive remarks against the Prime Minister. The woman, identified as Ruchika Singh, resides in Lotus Zing society in Sector 150, Noida. According to Smriti Singh, she verified the identity of the accused by checking her social media accounts and speaking with some of her acquaintances. She learned that Ruchika works in a salon and owns a house in Noida. Upon presenting the videos to the police, the officers reportedly covered their ears while watching parts of the footage. The police officer stationed at the Expressway police station confirmed that a zero FIR was registered under Sections 352, 353(1), and 356(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). These sections deal with intentional insults intended to provoke unrest, statements that incite public mischief, and defamation respectively. The initial investigation revealed that Ruchika is currently living with her family in Uncha Gaon, Faridabad. She had purchased a flat in the Lotus Society in January of this year, though the property has remained locked for several months. The incident occurred during the ongoing CJP protest at Jantar Mantar, prompting the police to transfer the case to Delhi Police for further investigation. The SHO stated that the transfer was made to ensure a thorough examination of the allegations. Smriti Singh emphasized that she gathered substantial evidence before approaching the authorities. Her efforts included cross-verifying information through social media and personal contacts. This led to the identification of Ruchika and the subsequent filing of the FIR. The police have not yet commented publicly on the specifics of the video content or the exact nature of the remarks attributed to the accused. Delhi Police have taken charge of the case and will conduct a detailed inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the alleged remarks. It is understood that the investigation will involve reviewing the videos, verifying the authenticity of the content, and assessing whether the statements constitute a violation of the law. The legal implications of such actions remain a subject of debate, particularly given the sensitive political context. The case highlights the broader tensions surrounding public protests and the enforcement of laws related to speech and behavior. While the police have acted based on the complaint, the absence of direct confrontation or physical altercation raises questions about the basis for the FIR. As the investigation unfolds, it will be crucial to determine whether the alleged remarks meet the legal threshold for prosecution. The outcome could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
A 25-year-old woman named Ruchika Singh from Noida was booked by local police after being accused of making 'objectionable' remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the CJP (Citizens for Justice and Peace) protest at Jantar Mantar in Delhi. The complaint was filed by Supreme Court advocate Smriti Singh, who provided video evidence and information gathered from the accused’s social media and friends. The police registered a zero FIR under sections related to defamation and public mischief from the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Initial investigations indicated that Ruchika lives with her family in Faridabad and had recently purchased a property in Noida, which has remained locked for several months. The case has now been transferred to Delhi Police for further investigation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the incident factually, citing both the complainant and the police response without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the complainant and police, providing balanced perspectives on the situation. There is no evident editorializing or biased language.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a zero FIR registered by Noida Police against a woman for alleged objectionable remarks against PM Modi during a CJP protest. It cites a complaint from Supreme Court advocate Smriti Singh and includes quotes from both her and a police officer. While there is no primary source
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the incident from the perspective of the complainant and includes emotional language describing the police covering their ears. While not overtly biased, the narrative leans toward the complainant's version of events and lacks balance by not including perspectives from the accus
Scroll.inIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 602 days ago
Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra criticized the BJP government's handling of youth protests over exam irregularities, accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of using excessive force and questioning the authorization of such actions. She highlighted systemic failures in the examination system, citing 152 paper leaks over a decade with no convictions. Vadra also condemned BJP MPs for welcoming former Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan after his resignation and criticized new Education Minister Prahlad Joshi for supporting the release of convicts in the Bilkis Bano case. Joshi responded by demanding verification of her claims, while Union Minister Kiren Rijiju accused her of 'character assassination' within Parliament.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the BJP government and PM Modi as unjustified use of force and systemic failure, aligning with left-wing critiques of authoritarianism and corruption. The emphasis on accountability and the condemnation of the government's actions reflect a left-leaning narrative.
Why factuality (50): The article focuses on the CJP's warnings and the government's response, without providing specific details about the pellet gun use or the injuries. It emphasizes the political implications of the situation rather than the factual aspects of the police actions.
Why objectivity (60): The tone is neutral, presenting the CJP's concerns and the government's assurances without overt bias. It maintains a balanced perspective on the political dynamics at play.
A 25-year-old woman from Noida, Ruchika Singh, has been booked by police for allegedly posting a social media video containing objectionable remarks about Prime Minister Narendra Modi during youth protests at Jantar Mantar. The FIR was registered under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to intentional insult, public mischief, and defamation. The complaint was made by Smriti Singh, a Ghaziabad resident, who alleged that the video undermined the dignity of the constitutional office and aimed to spread hatred and disrupt public peace. The police have also sent notices to social media platforms like X, requesting removal of derogatory content targeting constitutional heads and seeking detailed information about the accounts involved. Political figures, including Saurav Das of the Cockroach Janta Party and Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi, have criticized the use of criminal justice against protesters, urging caution in the use of objectionable language and condemning potential misuse of power.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the incident as a legitimate law enforcement action against perceived hate speech, emphasizing the legal basis for the FIR and the police's request for content removal. It highlights criticism from opposition leaders, but the overall tone supports the state's authority to regulate
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
India
