ON
← Back to feed
'Would wake up at noon, hit gym by 5': Yogi's 'babua' dig at Akhilesh's UP CM tenure
India🏛️ PoliticsConservative19 days ago

'Would wake up at noon, hit gym by 5': Yogi's 'babua' dig at Akhilesh's UP CM tenure

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath criticized former Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav, referring to him as 'Babua,' suggesting that during his tenure, Yadav prioritized personal activities like going to the gym over addressing public needs. Yogi made these remarks while inaugurating multiple development projects in Bulandshahr, highlighting the achievements of the current BJP government compared to the previous Samajwadi Party administration. He accused the former government of lacking vision, neglecting the needs of the youth, poor, women, farmers, and entrepreneurs, and failing to implement welfare schemes such as free ration, housing assistance, and health insurance. Yogi also pointed out that 29 sugar mills were shut down between 2007 and 2017, claiming the current government is working to revive them.

Yogi Adityanath, the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, made pointed remarks against former chief minister Akhilesh Yadav during a public event in Bulandshahr on Saturday. Addressing a gathering where he launched 57 development projects valued over Rs 574 crore, Yogi used a metaphor involving a figure known as "Babua" to critique Akhilesh’s tenure. He described how "Babua" would wake up at noon and be ready by 2 pm, heading to the gym by 5 pm, leaving little time for public engagement or developmental initiatives. This metaphorical jab was part of a broader comparison between the current BJP-led administration and the previous Samajwadi Party government. Yogi highlighted the differences in governance styles, asserting that the BJP government under his leadership has focused on development and welfare, whereas the earlier regime neglected the needs of the populace. He emphasized that the current government has introduced several welfare measures, such as free ration, housing assistance, health insurance, and LPG connections, which could have been initiated earlier but were not under the previous administrations. Yogi also criticized the lack of vision and sensitivity toward the marginalized sections of society during Akhilesh’s time in office. He claimed that there was insufficient attention given to the youth, the poor, women, farmers, and traders. According to him, these groups were overlooked, and the government failed to prioritize their well-being. He further stated that the previous leaders lacked the capability and vision necessary for effective governance. In addition to critiquing the administrative approach, Yogi addressed specific issues affecting the state's economy and social fabric. He mentioned the closure of 29 sugar mills between 2007 and 2017, with 21 of them sold at minimal prices. This, he argued, led to economic distress among farmers and affected the sugar industry. However, he noted that the current government is taking steps to revive these mills, signaling a shift in policy and focus. Yogi also accused the opposition of failing to protect the interests of farmers and undermining law and order. He referred to certain political factions as having betrayed the agricultural community and created an environment of fear for traders and entrepreneurs. These accusations suggest a growing tension between the ruling party and its rivals, particularly as the state prepares for upcoming legislative elections. Political analysts indicate that such rhetoric is becoming increasingly common as political parties gear up for the 2027 Uttar Pradesh assembly elections. The comments by Yogi reflect a strategic effort to differentiate the BJP's governance model from that of its predecessors and to appeal to voters by emphasizing progress and development. The focus on welfare schemes and infrastructure projects appears aimed at reinforcing the narrative of positive change and improved living standards under the current administration. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the implications of such statements will likely influence voter sentiment and campaign strategies. The ongoing discourse around governance, welfare, and economic revival underscores the significance of these developments in shaping the political trajectory of Uttar Pradesh. The state's transition from a perceived "BIMARU" state to one showing signs of recovery highlights the impact of recent policies and the potential for continued transformation.

1 reports

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 6019 days ago
'Would wake up at noon, hit gym by 5': Yogi's 'babua' dig at Akhilesh's UP CM tenure

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath criticized former Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav, referring to him as 'Babua,' suggesting that during his tenure, Yadav prioritized personal activities like going to the gym over addressing public needs. Yogi made these remarks while inaugurating multiple development projects in Bulandshahr, highlighting the achievements of the current BJP government compared to the previous Samajwadi Party administration. He accused the former government of lacking vision, neglecting the needs of the youth, poor, women, farmers, and entrepreneurs, and failing to implement welfare schemes such as free ration, housing assistance, and health insurance. Yogi also pointed out that 29 sugar mills were shut down between 2007 and 2017, claiming the current government is working to revive them.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents Yogi Adityanath's criticisms of Akhilesh Yadav using disparaging nicknames ('Babua') and contrasts the current BJP government's achievements with the previous Samajwadi Party administration in a manner that favors the ruling party. The framing emphasizes the failures of the Samj

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Yogi Adityanath's comments about Akhilesh Yadav's tenure as UP CM, quoting him directly about his routine and lack of focus on governance. It provides context about the event (inauguration of projects) and mentions the political contrast between BJP and SP. However, it

Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'swipe', 'no vision for the state's development', and 'Lord Ram has ensured that he is no longer in a position to do anything in the future'. These phrases suggest bias and favor the BJP narrative over the opposition. The tone is clearly critical

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories