BHP workers in Port Hedland have walked off the job for a second consecutive day, intensifying an ongoing industrial dispute that has disrupted operations at the region’s largest port. The strike, which began on August 8, has escalated following allegations that BHP threatened workers with no pay unless they returned to work. This comes as the company continues to negotiate with the Combined Ports Unions over terms related to wages, conditions, and workload. The partial strike initially targeted specific work areas, but it quickly expanded into a full-scale stoppage after workers reportedly faced pressure to resume duties. According to union representatives, the threat of financial loss was used to discourage participation in the protest. “BHP must understand that the Combined Ports Unions will not be deterred by threats or intimidation,” stated Craig Beveridge, the AWU state secretary. However, BHP denied the claims, asserting that the 47 work activities under the industrial ban left employees without tasks, thereby avoiding responsibility for unpaid hours. In a statement, the company emphasized that workplace laws do not require employers to compensate for time spent on banned activities. Meanwhile, another group of workers, those responsible for supplying high-voltage power to the Newman mine, located approximately 450 kilometers inland, also joined the strike, participating in a 12-hour work stoppage. Despite the disruption, BHP confirmed that ship loading continued during the strike, with vessels departing the port according to regular schedules influenced by tides and port planning. Multiple bulk carriers were observed leaving BHP berths, indicating that some operations remained functional. The Town of Port Hedland, while maintaining that it does not involve itself in labor disputes, expressed concern over the potential impact on local communities and businesses. Chief Executive Dale Stewart noted that the situation could create uncertainty among residents and organizations tied to the resource sector. “This is a matter between BHP, its workforce and their representatives,” he said, adding that the town supports efforts toward resolving the issue amicably. Industrial relations minister Simone McGurk urged both sides to maintain open dialogue, emphasizing the importance of reaching an agreement to ensure stability in the Pilbara region, a key economic hub for Western Australia. She highlighted the broader implications of the dispute, noting that fostering positive relationships beyond the immediate resolution is crucial. “I urge the parties to continue to meet to reach agreement,” she said, underscoring the significance of the area to the national economy. Negotiations between the unions and BHP have been ongoing since October, with 11 formal bargaining sessions conducted so far without success. A previous strike in July, lasting eight hours, reportedly caused minimal disruption. Despite these setbacks, neither side has ruled out further action. The unions remain cautious, while BHP has pledged to present an updated proposal at the next bargaining session with the Fair Work Commission on August 18. As tensions persist, the outcome of these discussions will determine whether the current standoff leads to a resolution or extends into further industrial action.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
Australia
