ON
← Back to feed
Economic data stolen Lawyer: Confidence in Liechtenstein has been shaken
CH🏛️ PoliticsCenter17 hr. ago

Economic data stolen Lawyer: Confidence in Liechtenstein has been shaken

Liechtenstein wurde vergangene Woche einem Cyberangriff zum Opfer, bei dem Daten von 31'000 Unternehmen, Gesellschaften und Stiftungen gestohlen wurden. Der Täter ist bislang nicht identifiziert. Ein Krisenstab tagt bereits seit Samstag. Martina Arioli, Rechtsanwältin für Technologierecht und Datenschutz, betont, dass die gestohlenen Daten sensible Informationen über Aktionäre und Vermögensverhältnisse enthalten. Sie warnen vor Risiken wie Identitätsmissbrauch und Phishing. Arioli erklärt, dass das Vertrauen in die digitale Sicherheit des Fürstentums erschüttert sei, was besonders bedeutsam ist, da Liechtenstein als Finanzmarktplatz bekannt ist. Zudem wird erwähnt, dass die Daten auch für die Terrorismusbekämpfung relevant waren und dass die Schweiz ein ähnliches Verzeichnis einführt.

Liechtenstein has identified a potential entry point used in a recent cyberattack that compromised economic data, according to government officials. The attack targeted the country’s registry of economically entitled persons, known as the VwbP, which was accessed at a high technical level, the government stated on Tuesday. The principality disclosed the cyberattack on Sunday, though the perpetrators remain unidentified. Investigations are ongoing. The initial findings indicate that the registry was attacked independently. According to preliminary results, the breach involved a highly sophisticated assault on a complex security structure. For safety reasons, additional sensitive data have been temporarily removed from online access. According to Fabian Schmid, head of the Office for Information Technology, the entry point was the portal used for recording entries into the VwbP. Based on preliminary findings, the attackers created access to this portal. Over several hours, they made individual queries on 31,000 entries related to companies, foundations, and trusts. Why this did not trigger an alert is under investigation, Schmid noted. The stolen data include names of legal entities and personal information such as names, birth dates, nationality, and country of residence for economically entitled individuals. Addresses, phone numbers, and financial data such as revenues, assets, or dividends were not affected by the data theft, according to official statements. The government confirmed that the attack targeted the registry of economically entitled persons maintained by the Justice Department. Forensic investigations revealed that no other systems were breached. Two systems, the central account register and the central tax system, were taken offline today as precautionary measures. There is no indication that unauthorized access occurred in these systems. All systems are now undergoing comprehensive security checks. According to the government's statement released on Sunday, an unknown perpetrator gained unauthorized digital access to the registry of economically entitled persons during the night of Thursday. Irregularities were noticed at the Justice Department on Thursday, prompting the involvement of the Office for Information Technology. This office took the affected system offline for security reasons. On Friday, the government was informed, and on Saturday, the first confirmed results of the preliminary investigation were submitted to the government. The law establishing the registry came into effect in 2021 to implement requirements set forth by the EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive. Before the abolition of banking secrecy in 2017, Liechtenstein was frequently exploited by tax evaders for their purposes. Martina Arioli, a lawyer specializing in technology and data protection, commented on the impact of the breach. She emphasized that the stolen data provide insights into the financial relationships and investments of individuals, making them sensitive information. The attack has shaken confidence in Liechtenstein's ability to manage digitalization effectively. However, she noted that the financial market in Liechtenstein benefits from trust in the confidentiality of such data. Arioli warned that the stolen data could be misused for identity theft and phishing attacks. Affected individuals must take protective measures, such as scrutinizing emails from unknown senders. It is crucial for the Data Protection Authority and affected individuals to be informed. She added that the crisis team in Liechtenstein can take several actions, including fulfilling legal obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation. They must investigate the incident thoroughly and implement necessary security measures to prevent further damage. Informing the Data Protection Authority and affected individuals is essential. The registry was managed by the government to prevent terrorist financing. Switzerland is also introducing a similar registry this year. Arioli stressed the importance of prioritizing data security. Individuals have no choice but to allow their data to be processed by authorities. Therefore, rigorous security measures must be implemented to prevent such incidents. The entire security architecture must be meticulously reviewed. The government has taken steps to address the breach, including removing sensitive data from online access and conducting thorough security assessments. The focus remains on identifying the perpetrators and preventing future breaches. The situation continues to evolve as investigations progress.

3 reports

SRF News logoSRF NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 7017 hr. ago
Economic data stolen Liechtenstein identifies potential gateway for hacking

Liechtenstein hat bei den Ermittlungen zu einem Cyberangriff ein potenzielles Einfallstor identifiziert, berichtete die Regierung am Dienstag. Das betroffene System ist das «Verzeichnis wirtschaftlich berechtigter Personen» (VwbP), das auf hohem technischem Niveau angegangen wurde. Der Angriff erfolgte über ein Portal zur Erfassung von Einträgen, wobei der Täter mehrere Stunden lang auf 31'000 Einträge zugreifen konnte. Finanzielle Daten wie Umsätze oder Vermögen waren nicht betroffen. Die Identität des Täters bleibt bislang unklar, und die Ermittlungen laufen weiter.

Bias read (Center): Der Artikel präsentiert Fakten über einen Cyberangriff auf ein staatliches System ohne klare politische Bewertung. Die Berichterstattung bleibt sachlich und konzentriert sich auf die technischen Aspekte des Vorfalls, ohne eine klare parteiliche Haltung oder Framing zu zeigen. Es wird keine politisch

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the identified vulnerability and the technical sophistication of the attack. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus and includes specifics about the affected system and the scope of the data accessed. The information is presented clearly and

Why objectivity (70): While the article is generally objective, there is a slight emphasis on the security measures taken by the authorities and the complexity of the attack. This may subtly highlight the seriousness of the situation, though it remains largely neutral in tone.

SRF News logoSRF NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 60yesterday
Economic data stolen Lawyer: Confidence in Liechtenstein has been shaken

Liechtenstein wurde vergangene Woche einem Cyberangriff zum Opfer, bei dem Daten von 31'000 Unternehmen, Gesellschaften und Stiftungen gestohlen wurden. Der Täter ist bislang nicht identifiziert. Ein Krisenstab tagt bereits seit Samstag. Martina Arioli, Rechtsanwältin für Technologierecht und Datenschutz, betont, dass die gestohlenen Daten sensible Informationen über Aktionäre und Vermögensverhältnisse enthalten. Sie warnen vor Risiken wie Identitätsmissbrauch und Phishing. Arioli erklärt, dass das Vertrauen in die digitale Sicherheit des Fürstentums erschüttert sei, was besonders bedeutsam ist, da Liechtenstein als Finanzmarktplatz bekannt ist. Zudem wird erwähnt, dass die Daten auch für die Terrorismusbekämpfung relevant waren und dass die Schweiz ein ähnliches Verzeichnis einführt.

Bias read (Center): Der Artikel berichtet neutral über einen Cyberangriff auf Liechtenstein und dessen Folgen, ohne klare politische Vorurteile oder parteiengesprächliche Bewertungen. Expertenmeinungen werden zitiert, aber keine politischen Parteien oder Interessen werden direkt kritisiert oder favorisiert. Die Bericht

Why factuality (80): This article accurately reports the number of stolen records and the ongoing investigation into the perpetrator. It includes quotes from an expert, Martina Arioli, which adds credibility. The facts align with the cross-source consensus, though it focuses more on the impact rather than the technical

Why objectivity (60): The article has a subjective tone, particularly when discussing the impact on public trust and the potential misuse of data. It emphasizes the sensitivity of the data and the threat to privacy, which may reflect the perspective of the legal professional quoted.

SRF News logoSRF NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 75Objective 65yesterday
31'000 stolen records The perpetrators of the cyberattack in Liechtenstein remain unclear

In Liechtenstein wurden etwa 31'000 Datenkopien von Gesellschaften, Stiftungen und Treuhänderschaften durch einen unbekannten Hackerangriff gestohlen. Die Täterschaft bleibt bislang ungeklärt, obwohl die Ermittlungen intensiv fortgeführt werden. Laut der Regierung handelte es sich um einen gezielten Angriff auf das Verzeichnis wirtschaftlich berechtigter Personen beim Amt für Justiz. Zwei Systeme – das zentrale Kontenregister und das zentrale Steuerfachsystem – wurden als Vorsichtsmaßnahme abgeschaltet, ohne Hinweise auf rechtswidrigen Zugriff. Das Gesetz über das Verzeichnis wurde 2021 eingeführt, um EU-Geldwäscherei-Richtlinien umzusetzen.

Bias read (Center): Die Berichterstattung bleibt neutral und berichtet faktisch über den Stand der Ermittlungen, ohne eine politische Richtung zu verfolgen. Es wird keine emotionale oder parteiliche Bewertung der Situation gegeben, lediglich Fakten und offizielle Stellungnahmen zitiert.

Why factuality (75): The article reports on the cyberattack in Liechtenstein, stating that 31,000 data records were stolen and the perpetrator remains unknown. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the nature of the attack and the systems affected. However, it lacks specific details on the timeline and doe

Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat alarmist, using phrases like 'auf Hochtouren' and emphasizing the uncertainty around the perpetrator. The article presents information from government statements but does not provide a balanced view of potential consequences or external perspectives.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories