ON
← Back to feed
Really extraordinary Pilots want to take off in the wrong direction in Frankfurt
Germany💼 Business

Really extraordinary Pilots want to take off in the wrong direction in Frankfurt

A Turkish Pegasus Airlines Airbus A321 taxiing at Frankfurt Airport entered the runway in the wrong direction before departing for Istanbul. The aircraft was cleared for takeoff on Runway 18 heading south but rolled northward onto the assigned entry point. Air traffic controllers from the Deutsche Flugsicherung (DFS) detected the error immediately and instructed the pilots to abort the takeoff at a low speed of 65 km/h. A DFS spokesperson described the incident as truly exceptional, noting that such errors are rare in Germany and that there was no acute danger because the situation was brought under control promptly. The Federal Office for the Investigation of Civil Aircraft Accidents has been notified and is assessing whether to launch a formal investigation. Fraport, the airport operator, confirmed the occurrence of an incident on Tuesday without providing further background details.

An Airbus A321 operated by Turkey’s Pegasus Airlines entered the wrong direction on a runway at Frankfurt Airport on Tuesday before air traffic controllers aborted the takeoff attempt. The aircraft was preparing for a flight to Istanbul when it rolled onto Runway 18 heading north instead of south. Controllers detected the error immediately and instructed the pilots to abort the departure while the plane was moving at approximately 65 kilometers per hour. A spokesperson for the German air traffic control service, Deutsche Flugsicherung or DFS, confirmed the incident and stated that the situation was brought under control quickly, preventing any acute danger. The aircraft had received clearance for a takeoff in the southern direction on Runway 18. According to aviation industry reporting, the jet used its assigned entry point onto the runway but began taxiing toward the northern end. The DFS spokesperson described the event as truly exceptional, noting that such occurrences are rare in Germany. He emphasized that there was no immediate threat because everything was managed promptly. The controllers saw the mistake right away and guided the pilots off the active runway. Following the aborted start, the aircraft remained on the ground briefly. Reports indicate that seven minutes after the initial error, the Pegasus Airlines jet successfully took off in the correct southern direction without further issues. The airport operator, Fraport, acknowledged that an incident occurred on Tuesday but declined to provide specific details regarding the circumstances. The DFS has formally reported the event to the Federal Office for Accident Investigation in Civil Aviation, known as BFU, which is based in Braunschweig. Officials at the BFU stated that they are currently reviewing the case to determine whether a formal investigation will be launched. The agency did not specify a timeline for this decision. The incident involves several key parties in the management of air traffic safety. Pegasus Airlines operates the low-cost carrier service between Frankfurt and Istanbul. The DFS is responsible for controlling air traffic in German airspace. Fraport manages the infrastructure of Frankfurt Airport, one of the busiest airports in Europe. The BFU serves as the independent authority tasked with investigating civil aviation accidents and serious incidents to improve safety standards. Details regarding the exact sequence of errors leading to the misdirection were not fully disclosed by official authorities. Initial reports from aviation portals suggested the crew followed the designated entry path but proceeded in the opposite direction along the strip. The DFS spokesperson reiterated that the primary factor in avoiding a more severe outcome was the rapid reaction of the control tower staff. They identified the deviation instantly upon visual confirmation or radar tracking. No injuries were reported among passengers or crew members during the aborted takeoff. The aircraft sustained no visible damage according to available information. The flight eventually completed its journey to Istanbul after the corrective takeoff. The incident highlights the critical role of human oversight in automated and procedural aviation environments. While modern aircraft have systems to assist crews, final decisions often rely on pilot input and controller guidance. The review process by the BFU will likely examine communication logs, cockpit recordings, and operational procedures. Such investigations aim to identify systemic weaknesses or individual errors that contributed to the near-miss. The findings could lead to recommendations for training improvements or procedural changes within the airline or at the airport level. Until the investigation concludes, the specific cause of why the aircraft headed north remains officially unconfirmed beyond the basic description of entering the runway in the wrong orientation. Fraport’s statement focused on confirming the occurrence of an incident without elaborating on internal reviews. This approach is common in preliminary stages of accident reporting, allowing regulatory bodies to conduct their inquiries independently. The DFS spokesperson’s comments underscored the rarity of such events in the German aviation sector, suggesting that standard operating procedures generally prevent directional errors on runways. The speed of 65 kilometers per hour at the time of abort indicates the aircraft was still in the early phase of the takeoff roll. At this velocity, stopping distance is manageable, especially with the assistance of reverse thrust and braking systems. The quick turnaround to a successful takeoff within seven minutes suggests minimal disruption to the airport's overall operations. Passengers on board likely experienced a brief delay but continued their travel plans shortly thereafter. This event adds to the record of aviation safety incidents monitored by European authorities. It serves as a case study for how close calls can be resolved through effective coordination between pilots and air traffic control. The ongoing assessment by the BFU will provide clarity on whether additional measures are required to enhance safety protocols at Frankfurt Airport or within Pegasus Airlines' operations. For now, the focus remains on the investigative phase, with public attention directed toward the eventual findings of the federal office.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

n-tv logon-tvIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 90
Air traffic controllers step in: ghost pilot jet takes off in the wrong direction in Frankfurt

An Airbus A321 operated by Turkish carrier Pegasus Airlines mistakenly rolled onto runway 18 at Frankfurt Airport in the wrong direction while preparing for a flight to Istanbul. Air traffic controllers immediately noticed the error and instructed the pilots to abort the takeoff once the aircraft reached a speed of 65 km/h. The incident was reported to the Federal Office for the Investigation of Civil Aviation Accidents, which is currently assessing whether a formal investigation is required. The airport operator Frapport confirmed the occurrence but did not provide further background details. The aircraft subsequently took off safely in the correct southern direction seven minutes after the initial mistake.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a specific aviation safety incident involving regulatory oversight and accident investigation authorities. While it involves state agencies like the Federal Office for the Investigation of Civil Aviation Accidents, the content is strictly factual and procedural regarding a non

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the cross-source consensus regarding the incident details: a Pegasus Airlines A321 taxiing in the wrong direction at Frankfurt, aborted takeoff at 65 km/h, and involvement of DFS and the accident investigation bureau. It cites specific sources (DFS spokesperson, The A

Why objectivity (90): The tone is largely neutral and journalistic. While the headline uses slightly dramatic phrasing ('Geisterfahrer-Jet' / 'Ghost driver jet'), the body text remains factual, relying on direct quotes from officials to convey the severity ('really unusual') rather than injecting editorial opinion. The f

Die Welt logoDie WeltIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 90
Really extraordinary Pilots want to take off in the wrong direction in Frankfurt

A Turkish Pegasus Airlines Airbus A321 taxiing at Frankfurt Airport entered the runway in the wrong direction before departing for Istanbul. The aircraft was cleared for takeoff on Runway 18 heading south but rolled northward onto the assigned entry point. Air traffic controllers from the Deutsche Flugsicherung (DFS) detected the error immediately and instructed the pilots to abort the takeoff at a low speed of 65 km/h. A DFS spokesperson described the incident as truly exceptional, noting that such errors are rare in Germany and that there was no acute danger because the situation was brought under control promptly. The Federal Office for the Investigation of Civil Aircraft Accidents has been notified and is assessing whether to launch a formal investigation. Fraport, the airport operator, confirmed the occurrence of an incident on Tuesday without providing further background details.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a specific aviation safety incident involving a commercial airline. While it involves regulatory oversight by state agencies like the DFS and the accident investigation office, the core subject is operational safety within the private aviation sector rather than a contested政治,

Why factuality (95): This article contains nearly identical factual content to Article 0, confirming the core facts: Pegasus Airlines, Frankfurt Airport, wrong direction, 65 km/h abort, DFS confirmation, and reporting by The Aviation Herald/Hessenschau. The information aligns perfectly with the available consensus. Ther

Why objectivity (90): The presentation is objective and restrained. Like the first article, it relies on official statements to describe the situation as 'extraordinary' but safe. The inclusion of navigation links and promotional text does not affect the neutrality of the news report itself. The language is standard jour

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories