ON
← Back to feed
Will BTS reconsider Grammy boycott as entry deadline looms?
KR🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 days ago

Will BTS reconsider Grammy boycott as entry deadline looms?

As the submission deadline for the 2027 Grammy Awards approaches, there is uncertainty about whether BTS will reconsider its decision to boycott the event. The Recording Academy, which introduced a new 'Best Asian Pop Music Performance' category earlier this year, has announced it will reevaluate the category after discussions with representatives from various music communities, including K-pop, J-pop, C-pop, and Indian music. However, with the submission period set to close soon, experts believe it is unlikely that any major changes will be made that would prompt BTS to withdraw its boycott. BTS had previously stated that they wanted their music to be recognized beyond regional or linguistic boundaries, and their agency has not indicated any shift in stance. The Recording Academy aims to ensure the category honors Asian pop music appropriately while considering future improvements.

Europe’s music community has voiced strong support for the decision of South Korean boy band BTS to boycott the 2027 Grammy Awards, with some suggesting the move reflects broader concerns over Western recognition of non-English music. The debate intensified after the Recording Academy announced plans to reintroduce a category for “best Asian pop music performance,” prompting questions about whether the decision was influenced by fears of BTS winning in the general field. The Grammy submission period for the 2027 ceremony is set to close on Friday, leaving little room for last-minute changes. BTS had previously decided not to enter the awards, citing a desire to prioritize artistic integrity over commercial recognition. Their stance gained traction among international fans and critics who argued that the Grammys should recognize global music without linguistic barriers. The group’s decision was made public on July 29, during which they emphasized their belief that music should be judged on its intrinsic value rather than its origin. The Recording Academy, however, has since reversed course, stating it will reassess the introduction of the new category following consultations with representatives from various Asian music industries, including K-pop, J-pop, C-pop, and Indian music. These discussions reportedly took place over two weeks and included participation from Hybe, the parent company of BTS. Despite these efforts, industry insiders suggest that any meaningful shift in policy is unlikely given the approaching deadline. Music critic Lim Hee-yun noted that many artists from other Asian regions may have already submitted work under the proposed category, making it impractical to alter the rules or cancel the category at this stage. “Changing the judging criteria or scrapping the category altogether just days before the entry deadline doesn’t make sense,” Lim said. An unnamed industry insider echoed this sentiment, expressing doubt that the Recording Academy could implement substantial revisions in such a short timeframe. Hybe, which manages BTS, has remained silent on whether the academy’s reconsideration might influence the group’s decision. A spokesperson for the company declined to comment on the situation, maintaining a neutral stance. Meanwhile, the Recording Academy has convened its full board and Awards & Nominations Committee to further discuss how best to honor the new category moving forward. The committee aims to ensure that the category respects the cultural context of the music while still aligning with the Grammys’ traditional standards. Recording Academy CEO Harvey Mason Jr. initially defended the new category as an effort to acknowledge the growing influence of Asian pop music globally. However, he also acknowledged the emotional impact of BTS’ decision, stating he was “saddened” by their choice but respected their reasoning. The academy’s current approach seeks to balance inclusivity with the preservation of the Grammys’ established framework, though the outcome remains uncertain. As the submission deadline approaches, the situation continues to evolve. While the Recording Academy’s willingness to reassess its policies signals a potential shift, the likelihood of a dramatic reversal remains low. For now, the focus remains on the final days leading up to the deadline, with all eyes on whether the Grammys will ultimately embrace a more inclusive model or maintain its existing structure.

2 reports

The Korea Herald logoThe Korea HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 806 days ago
Will BTS reconsider Grammy boycott as entry deadline looms?

As the submission deadline for the 2027 Grammy Awards approaches, there is uncertainty about whether BTS will reconsider its decision to boycott the event. The Recording Academy, which introduced a new 'Best Asian Pop Music Performance' category earlier this year, has announced it will reevaluate the category after discussions with representatives from various music communities, including K-pop, J-pop, C-pop, and Indian music. However, with the submission period set to close soon, experts believe it is unlikely that any major changes will be made that would prompt BTS to withdraw its boycott. BTS had previously stated that they wanted their music to be recognized beyond regional or linguistic boundaries, and their agency has not indicated any shift in stance. The Recording Academy aims to ensure the category honors Asian pop music appropriately while considering future improvements.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, discussing both the potential reconsideration of the Grammy category and the likelihood of BTS reversing its boycott. It includes perspectives from multiple stakeholders, such as critics, insiders, and the Recording Academy, without showing clear favor

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the situation surrounding BTS' potential reconsideration of their Grammy boycott, citing the Recording Academy's recent decision to review the Asian pop category and the approaching submission deadline. It includes quotes from industry insiders and music critics, pr

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the situation neutrally, reporting on different viewpoints including skepticism from industry insiders and the stance of the Recording Academy. It avoids taking an overtly emotional or biased position, though the title slightly frames the issue through the lens of uncertainty ra

The Hankyoreh logoThe HankyorehIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 653 days ago
‘Are they afraid BTS will win?’: Europe voices support for BTS’ Grammys boycott

The article discusses European reactions to BTS' decision to boycott the Grammy Awards. It highlights concerns and questions raised by some observers regarding the potential influence of BTS on the event, suggesting that their absence might be due to fears of them winning. The piece notes that European supporters have expressed solidarity with BTS' choice, indicating broader international attention to the group's actions and the implications for the music industry.

Bias read (Center): The article presents European perspectives on BTS' boycott of the Grammys without overtly favoring any side. It mentions concerns and support but does not exhibit clear bias toward either the artists or the awards organization. The framing remains balanced, focusing on the international reaction and

Why factuality (70): The article provides some factual background on the Grammy boycott and mentions European support, but lacks specific details or sources to substantiate claims about European sentiment. The headline suggests a narrative about fear of BTS winning, which is not clearly supported by the content. This li

Why objectivity (65): The article has a more subjective tone, suggesting a narrative about 'fear' of BTS winning, which may imply a bias toward the group's position. The phrasing 'voices support for BTS’ Grammys boycott' also implies a value judgment about the boycott itself, rather than presenting it as a neutral policy

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories